Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Keep the 49TH Climate Action Fund
Climate change activism hybrid PAC (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00806893 · files monthly
“The Jane Fonda Climate PAC has one goal: elect climate champions at the state and local level.”
Jane Fonda Climate PAC, on its own site, janepac.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
3 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Since our founding, we’ve fought to unseat politicians in the pocket of Big Oil, and replace them with climate champions willing to fight like hell for the planet we call home.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · janepac.com
Heading as listed on janepac.com ↗ (opens janepac.com at this heading)
JanePAC's objective is to end the stranglehold the fossil fuel industry has on our lives and our planet by electing climate champions at the state and local level.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · janepac.com/about
Heading as listed on janepac.com/about ↗ (opens janepac.com/about at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 32 | $161.5K · 89% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 1 | $5K · 2.8% |
| Other PACs and committees | 2 | $15K · 8.3% |
| All recipients | 35 | $181.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 11 | $42.5K |
| Texas | 3 | $30K |
| Florida | 4 | $19.5K |
| Arizona | 1 | $10K |
| Pennsylvania | 2 | $10K |
| Wisconsin | 2 | $9.5K |
| Utah | 1 | $5K |
| Washington | 1 | $5K |
The largest 8 of 16 states.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $2.8M from 16 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $8,004,751
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3,478 contributions · 42% | $1,197,107 |
| 519 contributions · 16% | $444,662 |
Total reported disbursements $5,447,673
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$5.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $454.5K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Climate change activism hybrid PAC Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Jane Fonda Climate PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $20K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $36.9K |
$36.9K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · 4 payments | $20K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to BEHN VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $9.5K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $9.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BATTLEGROUND BLUE PAC · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to RUSTBELT ROSEBUDS · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CASAR VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to PRAMILA'S PROGRESSIVE POWER PAC · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE TO THE FUTURE · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FIGHT BACK MIDWEST · 1 payment | $5K |
$181.5K across 33 recipient committees, or 3.3% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $266,721 |
| 222 contributions · 8.2% | $230,780 |
| 149 contributions · 4.9% | $138,451 |
| 341 contributions · 2.6% | $73,996 |
| 351 contributions · 2% | $55,811 |
| 509 contributions · 2% | $55,746 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 6,476 contributions · 51% of ranked | $1,395,215 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,182 contributions · 23% of ranked | $625,542 |
| 1 contribution · 3.6% of ranked | $100,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $75,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 110 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $32,800 |
| 1 contribution · 1.1% of ranked | $30,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $25,000 |
A further $18,364 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,555,349) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 6,034 contributions · 45% of ranked | $1,246,078 |
| 11 contributions · 8.1% of ranked | $227,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 422 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $142,502 |
| 22 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $117,099 |
| 3 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $75,000 |
| 225 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $66,182 |
| 9 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $63,750 |
| 87 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $62,443 |
A further $18,364 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,555,349) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,732,951
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 824 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
73 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $603,139 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 41 payments · 10% of all spending | $571,827 |
| 34 payments · 6.2% of all spending | $335,110 |
| 15 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $136,371 |
| 254 payments · 2% of all spending | $109,167 |
| 14 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $58,015 |
| 21 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $57,880 |
| 3 payments · 1% of all spending | $55,035 |
| 25 payments · 0.6% of all spending | $34,486 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.