Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00764860 · files monthly
“Ryan James Girdusky founded the 1776 Project PAC in 2021 to help elect conservatives to local and state school boards across the country. Before founding 1776 Project he worked as a political consultant, writer, and journalist”
The 1776 Project PAC, on its own site, 1776projectpac.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
9 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
We support reform-minded conservatives who oppose political indoctrination and believe in parental rights, safe and secure schools, fiscal transparency, improving educational standards, promoting transparency, and reversing pandemic-related learning loss.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · 1776projectpac.com
Heading as listed on 1776projectpac.com ↗ (opens 1776projectpac.com at this heading)
COVID-19 school closures took 50 million children out of classrooms across the country.
An analysis by The New York Times found that it set students back in math and reading proficiency by two decades while widening the achievement gap that divides poor and wealthy children.
We are committed to closing that gap and undoing the damage.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · 1776projectpac.com/priorities
Mothers and fathers are entitled to know what their children are learning in the classroom.
How their tax dollars are spent should not be a secret.
Information regarding learning activities and curriculum should be clear and readily available to parents and students alike.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · 1776projectpac.com/priorities
We believe, as Thomas Jefferson wrote, “that all men are created equal.”
Ideologies like critical race theory and DEI reject that fundamental belief of the American experiment.
These doctrines emphasize all the ways we are different instead of what we share in common.
They also subordinate the liberal arts to indoctrination.
We are committed to abolishing these ideologies from the classroom.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · 1776projectpac.com/priorities
We believe children are not society’s collective property.
Parents are their child’s first teacher and main priority and they should have a say in their children’s education.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · 1776projectpac.com/priorities
We believe that the best civic foundation for every child is a classical education in the liberal arts and sciences.
No other kind of curriculum can engage students in the principles of truth, justice, virtue, and beauty.
These essential ingredients have fallen by the wayside on the road to crafting curriculum around “diversity, equity, and inclusion” and critical race theory.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · 1776projectpac.com/priorities
Nearly every state enacted student data privacy laws between 2014 and 2020.
Still, schools have access to a vast amount of data that belongs to children, including images, videos, creative content, and more.
How that data is gathered, maintained, and utilized raises questions about online threats and privacy.
We also believe the process should also be transparent.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · 1776projectpac.com/priorities
Gender ideology has gained steam in recent years.
We believe that it poses a risk to young girls in a variety of different ways.
Biological sex is real and must be taken into account in schools.
Girls need their own space where they feel protected and supported.
This includes female locker rooms, bathrooms, and sports.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · 1776projectpac.com/priorities
The 1776 Project PAC is committed to reigniting the spark and spirit of that revolution by reforming school boards across America.
Since progressive led efforts to lockdown schools during the COVID epidemic: test scores have declined, parents and students are increasingly worried about violence both in and out of the classroom, while politicians and activists push their own ideology.
Students are taught to judge themselves and their peers by categories of race and gender rather than their character, intelligence, and individuality.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · 1776projectpac.com/ptype_sections/our-mission
The American mind is threatened to be shut.
That is why we have created this organization.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · 1776projectpac.com/about
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Republican candidates | 1 | $7K · 100% |
| All recipients | 1 | $7K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Alabama | 1 | $7K |
Bars drawn to $7K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · Connected to TAKE BACK THE HOUSE 2022 · 1 payment | $2.5K |
$2.5K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
The 13 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $8,716,156
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 16,505 contributions · 16% | $626,743 |
| 14,991 contributions · 13% |
Total reported disbursements $8,438,812
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$8.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.9M, Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
The 1776 Project PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
The 1776 Project PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| $7K |
$7K across 1 recipient committee, or <0.1% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $504,944 |
| 13,749 contributions · 12% | $454,009 |
| 4,866 contributions · 4.2% | $164,989 |
| 3,187 contributions · 2.8% | $108,956 |
| 3,199 contributions · 2.7% | $107,723 |
| 3,698 contributions · 2.7% | $107,716 |
| 4,230 contributions · 2.7% | $106,335 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 103,438 contributions · 82% of ranked | $2,918,600 |
| Written instead of an employer · 6,270 contributions · 7.6% of ranked | $271,910 |
| 28 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $14,174 |
| 11 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $10,778 |
| 24 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $10,705 |
| 10 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 93 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $9,819 |
| 18 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $7,400 |
A further $147,686 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($25,382) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 103,240 contributions · 80% of ranked | $2,912,373 |
| 694 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $40,442 |
| 21 contributions · 1% of ranked | $37,296 |
| 479 contributions · 1% of ranked | $34,970 |
| 475 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $26,847 |
| 855 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $22,719 |
| 251 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $21,334 |
| 19 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $19,100 |
A further $143,837 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($25,382) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $33,435
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 51 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $22,000 |
| 2 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $7,000 |
| 17 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $4,001 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $250 |
| 3 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $129 |
| 3 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $31 |
| 3 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $25 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.