Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › Alabama U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
RepublicanU.S. SenateAlabama
Has not served in Congress
7 priorities from murphyforalabama.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Rebuild our military, invest in shipbuilding, and ensure America leads from a position of strength.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · murphyforalabama.com
Heading as listed on murphyforalabama.com ↗ (opens murphyforalabama.com at this heading)
Secure our borders, hold China accountable, and demand that NATO allies carry their fair share.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · murphyforalabama.com
Heading as listed on murphyforalabama.com ↗ (opens murphyforalabama.com at this heading)
End the weaponized IRS and replace our broken tax code with a simple, transparent Fair Tax.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · murphyforalabama.com
Heading as listed on murphyforalabama.com ↗ (opens murphyforalabama.com at this heading)
Audit every federal agency, cut wasteful programs, and demand a balanced budget for Washington.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · murphyforalabama.com
Heading as listed on murphyforalabama.com ↗ (opens murphyforalabama.com at this heading)
Invest in clean, safe nuclear power while supporting energy independence and protecting Alabama’s natural resources.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · murphyforalabama.com
Heading as listed on murphyforalabama.com ↗ (opens murphyforalabama.com at this heading)
Stand up for life, family, faith, and the Constitution—always putting Alabama values first in Washington.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · murphyforalabama.com
Heading as listed on murphyforalabama.com ↗ (opens murphyforalabama.com at this heading)
FEC filings, Oct 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00921817
88¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 6 reports ($1.3M of $1.5M). Cash on hand went from $530.1K on Dec 31, 2025 to $171.3K on Sep 30, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $736,828 | $206,766 | $530,062 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $221,815 | $380,011 | $371,866 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 29, 2026 | $84,115 | $321,336 | $134,645 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $184,973 | $138,154 | $181,464 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 22, 2026 | $53,590 | $129,639 | $105,416 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $186,561 | $120,696 | $171,281 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Not yet called · 98% reporting · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Primary May 19, 2026 · runoff June 16, 2026 · 15 polls
Jared Hudson leads Barry Moore by 5 points · average gap, 4 latest nonpartisan polls · 1 far-off poll left out
Each dot is a poll. The line is the median of the 5 latest nonpartisan polls. How polls are read
Barry Moore won by 11.6 points. The 3 final polls had a median of Jared Hudson +4.7, understating Barry Moore's margin by 16.3 points.
| Poll | Barry Moore | Jared Hudson | Lead | vs. result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategy Managementended Jun 7 · led with the loser | 37.5% | 42.1% | Jared Hudson +4.7 | −16.3 |
| co/efficientended Jun 4 | 46% | 37% | Barry Moore +9 | −2.6 |
| The Alabama Pollended May 28 · led with the loser | 39.2% | 48.7% | Jared Hudson +9.5 | −21.1 |
| Median of the final polls | Jared Hudson +4.7 | −16.3 | ||
| Result | 55.8% | 44.2% | Barry Moore +11.6 |
June 16, 2026 · Result (unofficial, 99% reporting) · Each pollster's last poll ending in the 21 days before the vote and after the first round, read for the two leading finishers; the median leaves out polls a side paid for
Poll data from The New York Times, licensed CC BY 4.0 · Updated October 28, 2026 · 7 polls paid for by a party or campaign are left out
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 6,108 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $278K.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 4 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $148.7K.
The 2 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 3 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $12K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $1,467,883
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
30% of the money placed by state came from inside Alabama: $84.5K of $278K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 132 contributions · 30% | $84,526 |
| 1,467 contributions · 19% | $53,576 |
| 687 contributions · 9.5% | $26,454 |
| 447 contributions · 6.4% | $17,924 |
| 432 contributions · 5.2% | $14,324 |
| 171 contributions · 3% | $8,210 |
| 196 contributions · 2.4% | $6,644 |
| 160 contributions · 2.3% | $6,389 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 47 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 5,609 contributions · 79% of ranked | $165,649 |
| Written instead of an employer · 72 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $7,168 |
| 1 contribution · 1.7% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.7% of ranked | $3,499 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked | $3,080 |
| 2 contributions · 1% of ranked | $2,082 |
| 5 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $1,091 |
A further $68,978 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($624,876) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $41,000 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $784,406
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 1,434 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
6 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $48,608 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 173 payments · 9.2% of all spending | $119,433 |
| 44 payments · 8.9% of all spending | $115,739 |
| 88 payments · 6.7% of all spending | $87,070 |
| 139 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $55,840 |
| 109 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $50,816 |
| 5 payments · 3.1% of all spending | $40,500 |
| 200 payments · 2.9% of all spending | $37,354 |
| 8 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $32,568 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Not counted in the lead. This poll has Moore +9, 13.7 points from the median of the race's latest nonpartisan polls (Hudson +4.7); a poll more than 8 points from it is left out.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 5,603 contributions · 79% of ranked | $165,487 |
| 1 contribution · 1.7% of ranked | $3,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.7% of ranked | $3,499 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked | $3,080 |
| 3 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $2,342 |
| 5 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $1,830 |
| 67 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $1,475 |
A further $68,978 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($624,876) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.