Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (nonqualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Democratic Strategy Institute
Related: NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC TRAINING COMMITTEE PAC, INC. nonprofit Company Number EXTUID_4179092 Native Company Number N00005572182 Status Revoked https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_dc/EXTUID_4179092 (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00603084 · files monthly
“We’re here to build the future of the Democratic Party. At the heart of our mission is our proven belief that with lower barriers to entry, we can reach an untapped cohort of new leaders ready to fight for change.
We’re dedicated to doing just that with resources, courses, live trainings, and guided programs that are both comprehensive and free to use. We’re not just envisioning a better future – we’re cementing one brick by brick. The leaders who will carry our party forward in 2026 and beyond are being trained right now, with us, for free.”
National Democratic Training Committee, on its own site, traindems.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
1 priority from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
To build the next generation of Democratic leadership and long term Democratic power in every community.
Our Approach ↗ (opens traindems.org/impact at this heading)
Trainings through our Online Academy and Virtual Live Training programs reach every Democrat, in every ZIP code across the country.
Our programs, trainings, and ever-evolving resources provide Democrats with the tools they need to win in 2026, 2028, and beyond.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · traindems.org/impact
Heading as listed on traindems.org/impact ↗ (opens traindems.org/impact at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Other party committees | 2 | $1.7K · 85% |
| Other PACs and committees | 1 | $303 · 15% |
| All recipients | 3 | $2K |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $1.4K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 26 payments | $5.2M |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 19 payments | $2.8M |
$7.9M from 2 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 6 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 40,876 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.2M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 11 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $422.9K from 11 sources in all.
Total reported receipts $17,528,673
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 8,383 contributions · 24% | $278,136 |
| 3,206 contributions · 6.8% | $78,894 |
Total reported disbursements $17,697,274
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$17.7M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.2M, March 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Related: NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC TRAINING COMMITTEE PAC, INC. nonprofit Company Number EXTUID_4179092 Native Company Number N00005572182 Status Revoked https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_dc/EXTUID_4179092 Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
National Democratic Training Committee is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $1.4K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DNC STATE PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $324 |
| 2 payments | $303 |
$2K across 3 recipient committees, or <0.1% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 2,353 contributions · 6% |
| $70,090 |
| 1,550 contributions · 4.6% | $53,954 |
| 2,714 contributions · 4.4% | $50,803 |
| 1,455 contributions · 4.1% | $47,704 |
| 2,019 contributions · 4% | $46,373 |
| 1,392 contributions · 3.4% | $39,118 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 32,495 contributions · 81% of ranked | $871,638 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,980 contributions · 6.1% of ranked | $66,432 |
| Written instead of an employer · 534 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $19,634 |
| 40 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $4,000 |
| 6 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $2,592 |
| 25 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $1,981 |
| 20 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $1,950 |
| 18 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $1,764 |
A further $52,430 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Information requested, N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($6,452,004) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 32,601 contributions · 79% of ranked | $874,999 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 954 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $27,441 |
| 292 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $10,456 |
| 243 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $10,188 |
| 204 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $8,483 |
| 134 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $7,546 |
| 125 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $6,721 |
| 300 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $6,580 |
A further $35,687 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (Information requested, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($6,452,004) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $17,277,346
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 3,430 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
21 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $486,211 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 67 payments · 25% of all spending | $4,352,549 |
| 38 payments · 21% of all spending | $3,781,359 |
| 227 payments · 11% of all spending | $2,017,361 |
| 42 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $818,219 |
| 22 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $498,801 |
| 22 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $435,495 |
| 151 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $302,666 |
| 43 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $287,197 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.