Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00480830 · files quarterly
“CSEA is your advocate on the job, championing the issues that matter most to classified employees. Whether we're representing you at the bargaining table or giving you a voice at the State Capitol, CSEA makes a positive difference for all of our members.”
California School Employees Association, the organization this committee is the political fund of, csea.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
5 priorities from the site of California School Employees Association, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Three ballot propositions could slash funding for public schools, expose voters’ personal information, and threaten public safety.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · csea.com
Heading as listed on csea.com ↗ (opens csea.com at this heading) · “We Make a Difference” on csea.com ↗ (opens csea.com at this heading)
CSEA is standing up for students and our members by opposing multiple attacks against public education and working families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · csea.com/issues-and-advocacy
The current administration is continuing its effort to gut federal education programs and funding, including dismantling the U.S. Department of Education, rolling back civil rights protections, cutting off support programs for disabled students, ending programs for homeless children, and more.
As a result, schools are now facing unnecessary budget shortfalls and an overall lack of resources to educate their students.
Our students and schools deserve better.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · csea.com/issues-and-advocacy/defend-education
As workers, we earn our pension.
It’s not a gift, and it certainly isn’t a benefit we can afford to lose.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · csea.com/issues-and-advocacy
Like many in the education community, CSEA is concerned with the unregulated growth and lack of accountability of publicly-funded, privately-managed charter schools.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · csea.com/issues-and-advocacy
Charter Schools: Unregulated growth and lack of accountability
California students deserve to receive a quality public education.
That’s why classified employees, teachers and parents are deeply concerned with the unregulated growth and lack of accountability of the state’s 1,300 publicly funded, privately managed charter schools.
CSEA does not oppose charter schools; however, they should comply with the same laws as traditional schools.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · csea.com/issues-and-advocacy/charter-schools
There is no definitive determination that charter schools are more, or less, successful than traditional public schools, but one thing is certain – it leaves a lasting impact on our communities.
While public schools serve the local community by accepting all local students who enroll, charter schools are selective and only serve a small segment of students.
They also tend to be more racially segregated than traditional public schools and often fail to serve students with special needs.
This is disruptive to students and harmful to public schools.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · csea.com/issues-and-advocacy/charter-schools
Heading as listed on csea.com/issues-and-advocacy/charter-schools ↗ (opens csea.com/issues-and-advocacy/charter-schools at this heading) · “Charter Schools” on csea.com/issues-and-advocacy ↗ (opens csea.com/issues-and-advocacy at this heading)
The CSEA Retiree Unit represents retired classified employees and serves many vital functions.
It works to protect pension benefits and advocates for retirees’ rights.
It keeps CSEA members connected to their union and in touch with other retired members.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · csea.com/about-csea/retiree-unit
Heading as listed on csea.com/about-csea/retiree-unit ↗ (opens csea.com/about-csea/retiree-unit at this heading) · “CSEA Retiree Unit” on csea.com/issues-and-advocacy ↗ (opens csea.com/issues-and-advocacy at this heading)
For CSEA, political action has always been important.
But in an era of unpredictable school funding, skyrocketing healthcare costs and constant threats to employee rights and benefits, political action matters now more than ever before.
Like it or not, politics and public education are inseparable.
We elect school board members, legislators and governors.
We vote on ballot initiatives and bond measures.
And all of these decisions impact our lives every day—from how much funding public education gets, to what labor laws we work under, to what kind of pension we get when we retire.
CSEA's member activists and professional governmental relations staff are working hard to secure education funding, protect your job and improve public education, but they need your help.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · csea.com/issues-and-advocacy/political-action
Heading as listed on csea.com/issues-and-advocacy/political-action ↗ (opens csea.com/issues-and-advocacy/political-action at this heading) · “Legislative Issues” on csea.com/issues-and-advocacy ↗ (opens csea.com/issues-and-advocacy at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 12 | $63.5K · 35% |
| Democratic party committees | 2 | $13K · 7.2% |
| Other PACs and committees | 2 | $105K · 58% |
| All recipients | 16 | $181.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 12 | $63.5K |
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $2,489,650
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Total reported disbursements $3,336,506
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
$3.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $900K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Pace of California School Employees Association - Local, State, Federal Candidates is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names California School Employees Association as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Pace of California School Employees Association - Local, State, Federal Candidates is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bars drawn to $55K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $55K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $50K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE WAVE CALIFORNIA VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to 314 ACTION IMPACT SLATE · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MIKE MCGUIRE VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 1 payment | $8K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $5.5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to RUIZ VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CALIFORNIA HOUSE MAJORITY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to EFFIE AND MAI'S FUNDRAISING COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
$181.5K across 16 recipient committees, or 5.4% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Total itemized disbursements $293,521
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 39 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 1.7% of all spending | $57,191 |
| 1 payment · 1.6% of all spending | $55,000 |
| 17 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $54,831 |
| 1 payment · 1.5% of all spending | $50,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $8,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.