Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACMembership organizationWashington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Republican Jewish Coalition
501(c)(4) political lobbying group in the United States (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00345132 · files quarterly
“We seek to foster and enhance ties between the American Jewish community and Republican decision-makers. We work to engage Republican leadership in government and the Republican Party with the concerns and public policy priorities of the Jewish community. The RJC also articulates and advocates for Republican ideas and policies within the Jewish community. We are committed to helping Republicans win the electoral successes that lead to the policy accomplishments that benefit the Jewish community and the nation as a whole. We work to make the RJC the uniquely effective and respected Jewish Republican voice in Washington and across the country.
The Republican Jewish Coalition was founded in 1985 and is the unique bridge between the Jewish community and Republican decision-makers.”
Republican Jewish Coalition PAC, on its own site, rjchq.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
9 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Our grassroots outreach, public advocacy, and lobbying efforts on Capitol Hill cover many issues, including but not limited to: Israel, Iran, antisemitism, and domestic policies like school choice.
We also speak out when nominees for important government positions have a history of actions or statements that raise concerns for our community.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · rjchq.org
Heading as listed on rjchq.org ↗ (opens rjchq.org at this heading)
The Republican Jewish Coalition is a big-tent organization that is actively involved in the top national policy debates of the day.
Our grassroots outreach, public advocacy, and lobbying efforts on Capitol Hill cover many issues, including but not limited to: domestic policies like school choice, antisemitism, Israel, and Iran.
We also speak out when nominees for important government positions have a history of actions or statements that raise concerns for our community.
S. 558/HR1007 Antisemitism Awareness Act
Strengthen government response to antisemitic violence
Support school choice
- S. 1318/HR2701 Fallen Servicemembers Religious Heritage Restoration Act, to identify deceased members of the Armed Forces who were Jewish and buried in a U.S. military cemetery located outside of the United States under Latin Crosses, and replace those with Jewish grave markers
- S.1884/HR 4235 Holocaust Expropriated Art Recovery Act of 2025, to expand and improve access to US courts for American Holocaust survivors and their heirs whose artwork was stolen by the Nazis during the Second World War
Strengthen/Oppose lifting of or circumvention of Iran sanctions
Support strict enforcement of the Taylor Force Act
Continue current ban on UNRWA funding
Support the implementation and expansion of the Abraham Accords
Oppose re-opening PLO office in Washington DC
Support permanent recognition of Israel’s sovereignty over Golan Heights
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · rjchq.org/policy_action
Heading as listed on rjchq.org/policy_action ↗ (opens rjchq.org/policy_action at this heading)
The United States represents freedom, democracy, equality before the law, and national strength on a level that no other country can match.
America's world leadership is essential.
We support policies that keep America great, strong, and free.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · rjchq.org/statement_of_principles
The foremost job of our elected government is to protect American citizens.
We unwaveringly support a strong and robust national defense that puts the security of the American people first.
We support the equal and just application of the law to protect the safety of all Americans, regardless of background.
A nation without enforceable borders is no nation at all.
The RJC welcomes immigration within the rule of law.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · rjchq.org/statement_of_principles
America’s allies must trust us, and our enemies must fear us.
The United States is not the world’s policeman—nor should we be.
Diplomacy should be pursued when possible.
But when America’s national security is at stake, the RJC supports overwhelming and decisive military action.
First comes strength, then comes peace.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · rjchq.org/statement_of_principles
We strongly support the vigorous, competitive, free enterprise economic system - characterized by low taxes, low regulation, entrepreneurship, and robust job creation – that has proven over time to make America the most powerful, richest, and freest nation in the world.
We must give new enterprises and new technologies the opportunity to succeed, to keep America at the leading edge of economic growth and competitive success.
We believe that individuals are better qualified to decide what to do with their money than the government.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · rjchq.org/statement_of_principles
Our founding fathers designed a brilliant system of government that carefully balances federal, state and individual powers, rights and responsibilities, and the division of power between the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government.
This balance has become distorted through unrestrained government growth as well as corruption and fraud.
We advocate limited government at the federal and state levels and support efforts to reduce the federal deficit and restore economic sanity.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · rjchq.org/statement_of_principles
We fully embrace a pro-Israel foreign policy and an unbreakable bond between the United States and the Jewish State.
Nearly all of the military assistance provided for in the US Israel Security Assistance Memorandum of Understanding has been spent in the U.S., providing jobs for thousands of Americans.
Our close cooperation on development and production of weapons, strategy and tactics, testing and training, and intelligence sharing provide substantial benefit to the U.S. Israel’s transfer into CENTCOM in 2021 demonstrates a significant strategic shift following the Abraham Accords peace agreements, aligning the Jewish state with our regional partners and greatly enhancing operational cooperation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · rjchq.org/statement_of_principles
At a time when antisemitism is on the rise around the world and across the United States, it is imperative that our community call out, condemn, and stand firm against anyone - government officials irrespective of their political affiliation, the media, organizations, or academic institutions - that incites or tolerates hatred and violence against Jews or promotes double standards, demonization or delegitimization of the State of Israel.
The RJC has and will continue to respond forcefully to antisemitic and anti-Israel rhetoric and deeds, whether from the Left or from the Right.
The RJC is especially vigilant against the "woke right", as we cannot allow the cancer that has spread in the Democratic Party to grow inside our own; our party and our country should never tolerate anti-Jewish bigotry.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · rjchq.org/statement_of_principles
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Republican candidates | 82 | $456.3K · 76% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 7 | $16.4K · 2.7% |
| Other party committees | 1 | $1K · 0.2% |
| Other PACs and committees | 17 | $128.2K · 21% |
| All recipients | 107 | $601.9K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Kentucky | 3 | $59.4K |
| Florida | 16 | $57.5K |
| Texas | 8 | $42.1K |
| North Carolina | 2 | $35K |
| Michigan | 5 | $34.5K |
| Iowa | 4 | $32K |
| Ohio | 4 | $32K |
| Maine | 2 | $19.4K |
The largest 8 of 33 states.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,235 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.6M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $2,749,872
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 515 contributions · 31% | $802,690 |
| 312 contributions · 19% | $484,450 |
| 346 contributions · 16% | $411,860 |
| 99 contributions · 7.1% | $182,574 |
Total reported disbursements $2,726,883
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
$2.7M spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $884.8K, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Late 12G report, 2006$1.4K assessed
Case 1632 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
Besides giving through its PAC, Republican Jewish Coalition pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $155K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “REPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITION”, found by searching “REPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITION”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 27, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
501(c)(4) political lobbying group in the United States Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Republican Jewish Coalition PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $54.4K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $2.8K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $1K |
$3.8K from 2 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · Connected to GALLREIN VICTORY FUND · 35 payments | $54.4K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 22 payments | $38K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to WHATLEY VICTORY COMMITTEE · 10 payments | $30K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM FINE · 9 payments | $23.2K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 18 payments | $18.4K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ASHLEY HINSON VICTORY COMMITTEE · 3 payments | $17K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to COLLINS VICTORY COMMITTEE · 9 payments | $14.4K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 7 payments | $13.6K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MAX MILLER VICTORY · 5 payments | $12K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to TEAM ROGERS · 5 payments | $11.1K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to GOLDMAN VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $11K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to KUSTOFF VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $11K |
$601.9K across 107 recipient committees, or 22% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 32 contributions · 4.2% |
| $109,300 |
| 35 contributions · 3.4% | $87,373 |
| 58 contributions · 3.1% | $78,560 |
| 47 contributions · 2.8% | $71,490 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,210 contributions · 41% of ranked | $1,039,693 |
| Written instead of an employer · 241 contributions · 9% of ranked | $231,722 |
| 15 contributions · 8.3% of ranked | $213,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 12 contributions · 3% of ranked | $78,000 |
| 10 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $64,300 |
| 15 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $63,400 |
| 16 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $53,146 |
| 7 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $46,000 |
Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($17,934) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,208 contributions · 40% of ranked | $1,039,193 |
| 157 contributions · 9.4% of ranked | $241,450 |
| 15 contributions · 8.3% of ranked | $213,000 |
| 26 contributions · 5% of ranked | $129,196 |
| 51 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $81,977 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 19 contributions · 3% of ranked | $78,411 |
| 41 contributions · 3% of ranked | $76,590 |
| 44 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $74,650 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($17,934) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $628,499
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 334 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 35 payments · 2% of all spending | $54,398 |
| 22 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $38,010 |
| 10 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $30,021 |
| 9 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $23,175 |
| 18 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $18,421 |
| 3 payments · 0.6% of all spending | $17,000 |
| 9 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $14,372 |
| 7 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $13,631 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.