Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACCorporationIrving, TexasActive
Connected organization: Vistra Corp.
Political fund of Vistra Corp.
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00226548 · files monthly
1 priority from the site of Vistra Corp., the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Vistra Energy does not provide charitable support for:
- Individuals.
- Organizations that have bylaws and/or practices that are not reflective of the core values of Vistra Energy.
- Groups that do not reflect diversity and mutual respect, or groups that discriminate.
- Political, labor, or fraternal organizations.
- Religious groups for religious purposes.
- Political or partisan organizations or candidates. (Contributions to which are made through our qualified Political Action Committees.)
- Organizations established to influence legislation or specific elections.
- Individual teams or single sporting events.
- Animal welfare groups.
- In most cases, Vistra Energy employees and community affairs proactively decide where community investments will be made. Unsolicited requests for contributions will be screened for eligibility by Vistra Energy community affairs and can be sent to community.affairs@vistracorp.com.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · vistracorp.com/about/community-giving/corporate-giving-policy
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 46 | $202,500 | $0 | $202,500 | 71% |
| Democratic | 17 | $49,500 | $0 | $49,500 | 17% |
| Other or unresolved | 13 | $35,000 | $0 | $35,000 | 12% |
| Shown support | 76 | $287,000 | $0 | $287,000 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 17 | $49.5K · 14% |
| Republican candidates | 44 | $196.5K · 55% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 16 | $46K · 13% |
| Other PACs and committees | 10 | $64K · 18% |
| All recipients | 87 | $356K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 16 | $77.5K |
| Ohio | 10 | $40K |
| Pennsylvania | 8 | $34.5K |
| Illinois | 4 | $22.5K |
| California | 5 | $17K |
| Oklahoma | 4 | $13K |
| Kentucky | 1 | $10K |
| New Jersey | 2 | $8.5K |
The largest 8 of 29 states.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 6,054 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $953.9K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,294,005
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4,785 contributions · 79% | $756,123 |
| 432 contributions · 4.3% | $41,410 |
| 240 contributions · 3.2% | $30,144 |
| 59 contributions · 2.1% | $19,592 |
| 22 contributions · 1.9% | $18,320 |
| 74 contributions · 1.3% |
Total reported disbursements $1,333,294
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $355,000
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 204 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending |
$1.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $296K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, Vistra Corporate Services Company F/K/A Vistra Energy pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $56.4K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “VISTRA CORPORATE SERVICES COMPANY F/K/A VISTRA ENERGY”, found by searching “VISTRA”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 27, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Vistra Employee PAC of Vistra Corp. is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names Vistra Corp. as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Vistra Employee PAC of Vistra Corp. is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bars drawn to $10K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND DEMOCRACY NOW PAC · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to HISPANIC LEADERSHIP TRUST PARTNERSHIP · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM JOYCE FOR PENNSYLVANIA · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to JAKE ELLZEY VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BALDERSON VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to PFLUGER VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to LANGWORTHY LEADERSHIP & ACCOUNTABILITY FUND · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MORAN VICTORY FUND · 9 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BETH VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM FITZ · 3 payments | $8.5K |
$356K across 95 recipient committees, or 27% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $12,137 |
| 20 contributions · 1.2% | $11,416 |
| 141 contributions · 1.1% | $10,602 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,965 contributions · 35% of ranked | $332,389 |
| 1,352 contributions · 20% of ranked | $189,914 |
| 1,383 contributions · 17% of ranked | $157,710 |
| 400 contributions · 8.9% of ranked | $84,984 |
| 11 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 261 contributions · 3% of ranked | $28,878 |
| 205 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $27,610 |
| 230 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $27,598 |
A further $1,495 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($251,569) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $40,000 |
| 292 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $31,972 |
| 60 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $24,960 |
| 66 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $24,302 |
| 4 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 66 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $12,896 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $1,495 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($251,569) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 3 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 4 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 3 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 4 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.