Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
Party committee (qualified)Portland, OregonActive
Connected organization: Asdc Partnership Program
The Democratic Party of Oregon is the Oregon affiliate of the Democratic Party. The State Central Committee, made up of two delegates elected from each of Oregon's 36 counties and one additional delegate for every 15,000 registered Democrats, is the main authoritative body of the party. The party has 17 special group caucuses which also each have representation on the State Central Committee. After Oregon was admitted as a state in 1859, Oregon elected twice as many Democrats as Republicans between 1859 and 1879 in statewide elections. It is currently the dominant party in the state, holding all but one of Oregon's six United States House of Representatives seats, both United States Senate seats, both houses of the Oregon Legislative Assembly, and the office of governor. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00188367 · files monthly
“The Democratic Party of Oregon promotes the election of Democratic candidates at every level across the state of Oregon with technical and volunteer support. We provide opportunities for all Oregon Democrats to participate fully in our political process. The Democratic Party of Oregon supports local county Parties to make sure that every community can work to get Democratic Candidates elected.”
Democratic Party of Oregon, on its own site, dpo.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
11 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Oregon Democrats believe that rights and responsibilities go hand in hand.
It’s up to all of us to work for a present and future society that treats every individual with dignity and respect, provides for the health and education of future generations, grows Oregon’s businesses and local economies, safeguards our civil liberties and democratic rights, and protects the natural environment in which we all live.
For press inquiries, please contact us at [email protected].
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dpo.org/party/about-the-party
The Democratic Party of Oregon commits itself to the principles and positions contained in this platform in order to secure a more just and prosperous future for all Oregonians.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dpo.org/party/platform-priority-legislative-action-items
2025 Democratic Party of Oregon Priority Legislative Action Items Create, adopt, or implement Legislation to, or for:
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dpo.org/party/platform-priority-legislative-action-items
Resolution 2022-01: Regarding Ending Unjust Financial Burdens to Those Living in Poverty Resulting from Legal Fines and Charges
Resolution 2022-08: Regarding The Democratic Party Of Oregon’s Recognition And Ratification Of The Official July 26, 2022, Reorganization Meeting Of The Dpo Elections Integrity Caucus And The Results Of Its Official Officers Election
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dpo.org/party/resolutions/2022-resolutions
Resolution 2021-10: Concerning Representative Kurt Schrader’s Lack of Support for the Platform of both the State and National Democratic Parties Regarding Medicare Negotiating Prescription Drug Prices
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dpo.org/party/resolutions/2021-resolutions
Resolution 2019-003: Regarding the modernization of forest practices in Oregon
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dpo.org/party/resolutions/2019-resolutions
Heading as listed on dpo.org/party/resolutions ↗ (opens dpo.org/party/resolutions at this heading)
2024-06: Regarding Recognizing the Intersectionality of Juneteenth and Pride and Honoring the Contributions of Women & Femmes of Color In Social Justice Movements
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dpo.org/party/resolutions/2024-2
Heading as listed on dpo.org/party/resolutions ↗ (opens dpo.org/party/resolutions at this heading)
The Bureau of Indian Affairs be removed as caretakers of the cemetery and supervision of Chemawa Indian School and adjacent property and be replaced by a coalition of Tribes who have called the Chemawa property as their tribal homelands since Time Immemorial.
Resolution submitted by Kevin Simmons; Native American Caucus; William Miller; Native American Caucus; John Spence; Native American Caucus; Randy Knop;Union County; and Valdez Bravo, Native American Caucus
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dpo.org/party/resolutions/2025-2/2025-04-honoring-the-lost-children-of-chemawa-indian-school
WHEREAS, the Democratic Party of Oregon (DPO) and its platform specifically seek to advance peace, justice, and freedom for the benefit and welfare of those both in Oregon and around the world; and
WHEREAS, every country has a right to defend itself; thus, Israel has a right to hold Hamas accountable for the terrorist attack on civilians in Israel on October 7, 2023; and
WHEREAS, targeting civilians, no matter their faith, culture, or ethnicity, is a violation of international humanitarian law, and civilian casualties are tragic and intolerable; and
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dpo.org/party/resolutions/2024-2/a-resolution-of-the-democratic-party-of-oregon-resolution-no-2024-02-regarding-a-call-for-peace-in-israel-and-palestine
WHEREAS, At age 27, Ms. Hamer married Perry “Pap” Hamer.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dpo.org/party/resolutions/2024-2/resolution-no-2024-04-in-celebration-of-black-history-month-2024-honoring-ms-fannie-lou-hamer
WHEREAS, House Concurrent Resolution 60 (H. Con.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dpo.org/party/resolutions/2022-resolutions/resolution-2022-07
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $2.9K · 100% |
| All recipients | 1 | $2.9K |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $2.9K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 28 payments | $204K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 11 payments | $160.9K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $125K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 3,686 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $854.5K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $4,295,987
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3,639 contributions · 92% | $788,550 |
| 4 contributions · 2.1% | $18,000 |
| 31 contributions · 1.7% | $14,550 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% | $10,420 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% | $10,000 |
| 5 contributions · 0.7% | $6,280 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% | $5,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.1% |
Total reported disbursements $4,110,159
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$4.1M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $505.3K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
The Democratic Party of Oregon is the Oregon affiliate of the Democratic Party. The State Central Committee, made up of two delegates elected from each of Oregon's 36 counties and one additional delegate for every 15,000 registered Democrats, is the main authoritative body of the party. The party has 17 special group caucuses which also each have representation on the State Central Committee. After Oregon was admitted as a state in 1859, Oregon elected twice as many Democrats as Republicans between 1859 and 1879 in statewide elections. It is currently the dominant party in the state, holding all but one of Oregon's six United States House of Representatives seats, both United States Senate seats, both houses of the Oregon Legislative Assembly, and the office of governor. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Democratic Party of Oregon is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $93K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $68K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to PROGRESS FOR OREGON · 1 payment | $60K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $40K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 5 payments | $20K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $15K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to WYDEN FOR OREGON · 1 payment | $15K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $13.6K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to SEEC VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $12.5K |
$889K from 26 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments | $139.2K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to NV PARTY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $70K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 3 payments | $19.1K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $2.9K |
$231.2K across 4 recipient committees, or 5.6% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $219.7K from 93 sources in all.
| $1,162 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,718 contributions · 45% of ranked | $363,513 |
| Written instead of an employer · 504 contributions · 15% of ranked | $116,431 |
| Written instead of an employer · 177 contributions · 9.3% of ranked | $74,228 |
| 2 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $21,032 |
| 5 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $16,540 |
| 2 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $12,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $42,130 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($593,421) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,855 contributions · 47% of ranked | $390,736 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 441 contributions · 11% of ranked | $94,775 |
| 11 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $30,360 |
| 2 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $21,032 |
| 11 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $17,545 |
| 30 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $15,895 |
| 13 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $11,628 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $10,040 |
A further $13,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($593,421) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $639,343
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 451 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
37 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $26,527 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $139,182 |
| 1 payment · 1.7% of all spending | $70,000 |
| 21 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $60,909 |
| 67 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $59,550 |
| 24 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $57,235 |
| 37 payments · 1% of all spending | $40,861 |
| 10 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $29,016 |
| 1 payment · 0.6% of all spending | $25,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.