Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACMembership organizationWashington, District of ColumbiaActive
Lobbying PAC (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00150367 · files monthly
“We support the foundation of high-growth companies and ensure the U.S. remains the most competitive environment in the world for entrepreneurs.”
National Venture Capital Association Venturepac, on its own site, nvca.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
9 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
NVCA advocates for policies that create U.S. economic growth and fuel entrepreneurship.
As the voice of the venture capital community, NVCA empowers its members by advocating for policies that encourage innovation and delivering resources and programs to help VCs succeed.
We are committed to advancing policies that foster entrepreneurial activity and investment across the country.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nvca.org/public-policy
NVCA advocates for tax policy that encourages new company formation by focusing on where the tax code impacts entrepreneurship.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nvca.org/public-policy
Heading as listed on nvca.org/public-policy ↗ (opens nvca.org/public-policy at this heading)
NVCA encourages policies that help immigrant entrepreneurs build and grow businesses in the U.S.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nvca.org/public-policy
Heading as listed on nvca.org/public-policy ↗ (opens nvca.org/public-policy at this heading)
NVCA champions a policy agenda that expands opportunities for capital formation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nvca.org/public-policy
Heading as listed on nvca.org/public-policy ↗ (opens nvca.org/public-policy at this heading)
NVCA believes it is critical to protect passive foreign investment into U.S. venture funds.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nvca.org/public-policy
Heading as listed on nvca.org/public-policy ↗ (opens nvca.org/public-policy at this heading)
NVCA supports patent reform legislation that protects emerging companies’ innovative ideas.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nvca.org/public-policy
Heading as listed on nvca.org/public-policy ↗ (opens nvca.org/public-policy at this heading)
NVCA’s endorses basic federal research investment as the underlying foundation for the innovation economy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nvca.org/public-policy
Heading as listed on nvca.org/public-policy ↗ (opens nvca.org/public-policy at this heading)
NVCA fosters policy priorities that enhance the U.S. technology and Internet sectors.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nvca.org/public-policy
Heading as listed on nvca.org/public-policy ↗ (opens nvca.org/public-policy at this heading)
NVCA advocates for polices that support energy technology and the advancement of energy-focused startups.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nvca.org/public-policy
Heading as listed on nvca.org/public-policy ↗ (opens nvca.org/public-policy at this heading)
NVCA believes medical innovation should become a national priority for patients and our healthcare system.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nvca.org/public-policy
Heading as listed on nvca.org/public-policy ↗ (opens nvca.org/public-policy at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 42 | $137,500 | $0 | $137,500 | 46% |
| Democratic | 32 | $121,500 | $0 | $121,500 | 41% |
| Other or unresolved | 15 | $39,500 | $0 | $39,500 | 13% |
| Shown support | 89 | $298,500 | $0 | $298,500 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 32 | $121.5K · 20% |
| Republican candidates | 41 | $132.5K · 22% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 17 | $49.5K · 8.1% |
| Democratic party committees | 2 | $60K · 9.8% |
| Republican party committees | 1 | $30K · 4.9% |
| Other PACs and committees | 45 | $220.5K · 36% |
| All recipients | 138 | $614K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 13 | $36.5K |
| Kansas | 4 | $20K |
| New York | 6 | $20K |
| Massachusetts | 2 | $17.5K |
| North Carolina | 4 | $15.5K |
| Texas | 4 | $14.5K |
| Illinois | 3 | $14K |
Each as the committee named it on this line.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 222 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $708K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,721,237
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 118 contributions · 61% | $430,949 |
| 17 contributions · 7.5% | $53,000 |
| 13 contributions · 5.6% | $40,000 |
| 7 contributions · 3.5% | $25,000 |
| 9 contributions · 3.3% | $23,500 |
| 8 contributions · 2.8% |
Total reported disbursements $1,058,581
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.1M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $137K, February 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Late 12G report, 2002$6K assessed
Case 837 at the FEC ↗Late M8 report, 2001$750 assessed
Case 526 at the FEC ↗Late M9 report, 2000$500 assessed
Case 95 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Lobbying PAC Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
National Venture Capital Association Venturepac is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| Colorado | 3 | $13.5K |
|---|
The largest 8 of 42 states.
Bars drawn to $30K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 3 payments | $30K |
| 1 payment | $15K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND DEMOCRACY NOW PAC · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| Senate campaign committee · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEAL VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TAKE BACK THE HOUSE 2022 · 7 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to ADRIAN SMITH VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $8.5K |
$614K across 139 recipient committees, or 58% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $5K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $20,000 |
| 10 contributions · 1.8% | $12,600 |
| 4 contributions · 1.7% | $12,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 14 contributions · 8.9% of ranked | $62,000 |
| 30 contributions · 8.6% of ranked | $60,100 |
| 13 contributions · 6.7% of ranked | $47,000 |
| 11 contributions · 6.3% of ranked | $44,000 |
| 9 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $29,500 |
| 6 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $26,200 |
| 6 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $25,500 |
| 5 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $25,000 |
A further $10,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,250) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 56 contributions · 31% of ranked | $214,833 |
| 27 contributions · 12% of ranked | $84,783 |
| 35 contributions · 12% of ranked | $82,500 |
| 24 contributions · 11% of ranked | $74,500 |
| 21 contributions · 9.5% of ranked | $66,333 |
| 12 contributions · 7.1% of ranked | $49,500 |
| 3 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $10,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,250) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $628,622
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 349 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 3 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 1 payment · 1.4% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 139 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $14,622 |
| 2 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.