Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
Party committee (qualified)Jefferson City, MissouriActive
Connected organization: Democratic Grassroots Victory Fund
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00135558 · files monthly
“The Missouri Democratic Party holds the distinction of being the oldest political party in the United States established west of the Mississippi River. For the last century, we've led the fight for working families. Today, we're organizing in communities across Missouri to protect and build on our progress.”
Missouri Democratic State Committee, on its own site, missouridemocrats.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
17 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Attacks reproductive rights by reversing what Missourians just voted for in 2024.
A "yes" vote would add intense regulations, limit exceptions, and give politicians additional power to regulate reproductive healthcare decisions in the Missouri Constitution.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouridemocrats.org/2026-general-election
Expands and preserves the initiative and referendum process into a fundamental right for Missouri citizens and adds protections to keep politicians from putting issues back on the ballot that citizens have already voted into law.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouridemocrats.org/2026-general-election
Creates a permanent public endowment fund managed by the state without clear tools for voter oversight or guardrails, further concentrating financial power in the hand of state politicians.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouridemocrats.org/2026-general-election
If this passed, Amendment 8 would elevate the already-elected sheriff of every county to a position akin to chief law enforcement officer and make it extremely difficult for voters to remove a bad sheriff.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouridemocrats.org/2026-general-election
A "NO" vote on Proposition A would prevent the gerrymandered HB1 map from taking effect, weakening local control and representation in pursuit of purely partisan outcomes.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouridemocrats.org/2026-general-election
Democrats believe that everyone deserves the chance to succeed when they work hard and play by the rules.
We believe that vital tools like quality education, access to healthcare, civil rights and a responsible budget are the key ingredients to good governance and greater opportunity for all.
Missouri Democrats are fired up and ready to bring change to Washington D.C., Jefferson City, and their own communities.
"Our state needs a strong Democratic Party in every corner.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouridemocrats.org/party
"America was not built on fear.
America was built on courage, on imagination, and an unbeatable determination to do the job at hand."
The Missouri Democratic Party champions progress, opportunity, and fairness for every Missourian, whether they live in a rural community, on a family farm, or in the heart of a city.
Our platform is about bridging divides, not deepening them, because in every corner of the state, families want the same things—safe communities, strong schools, good jobs, and a government that has their back.
That’s the promise we’re fighting for together.
Platform unanimously adopted on Saturday, April 18th, 2026.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouridemocrats.org/party-documents
The Missouri Democratic Party supports an economy that benefits all Missourians by focusing on strengthening working families through investments, fair wages, and strong worker protections.
We champion progressive taxation that will fully fund essential programs that reduce income inequality, expand opportunity, provide quality education for all children, and give families the tools they need to thrive.
By promoting equitable access to jobs, affordable housing, and quality healthcare, we foster long-term prosperity rooted in fairness and dignity.
Prosperity also means helping Missourians build something of their own.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouridemocrats.org/party-documents
The Missouri Democratic Party believes that a strong, skilled workforce depends on strong labor unions that protect and empower workers by strengthening organized labor and ensuring union values are reflected in both policy and practice.
We proudly support the use of union labor for all jobs created through state or local tax incentives, including public development projects, to ensure that working Missourians benefit first.
We believe every campaign and party initiative should reflect these values by prioritizing union labor for mailings, materials, vehicles, and other paid work.
This isn’t about politics—it’s about solidarity in action.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouridemocrats.org/party-documents
The United States spends more on healthcare than any other nation, yet too many Missourians still can't get the care they need.
Our system prioritizes profits over patients, driving up costs while rural hospitals close and urban clinics are overwhelmed.
Missouri Democrats believe that affordable and accessible healthcare is a fundamental human right, not a privilege, and that no family should go bankrupt from medical bills or life-saving pharmaceuticals.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouridemocrats.org/party-documents
We interpret the Declaration of Independence in its literal form, that all people are created equal with the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
We believe in the First Amendment, which guarantees our freedom of speech, religion, and the right to protest.
We oppose all efforts to limit, intimidate, and infringe upon these rights.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouridemocrats.org/party-documents
Our children are our future, and equitable access to quality education is the key to opportunity.
Whether growing up on a family farm, in a rural community, or in an urban neighborhood, all deserve a fair shot.
Missouri ranks among the worst states in education due to years of Republican budget cuts.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · missouridemocrats.org/party-documents
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 1 | $3.5K · 100% |
| All recipients | 1 | $3.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Missouri | 1 | $3.5K |
Bars drawn to $3.5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 41 payments | $372.1K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 11 payments | $166.8K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $26.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,470 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $250.3K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 6 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $1,989,907
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,415 contributions · 93% | $231,731 |
| 8 contributions · 2.1% | $5,340 |
| 4 contributions · 1.1% | $2,862 |
| 2 contributions · 0.9% | $2,200 |
| 10 contributions · 0.9% | $2,150 |
| 2 contributions · 0.6% | $1,450 |
| 1 contribution · 0.4% | $1,000 |
Total reported disbursements $1,871,602
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.9M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $168.3K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2004 cycleReport released Feb 3, 2009
2002 cycleReport released Sep 21, 2005
2000 cycleReport released Nov 17, 2003
1998 cycleReport released Aug 31, 2001
1996 cycleReport released Apr 14, 2000
Late Q2 report, 2000$6.8K assessed
Case 48 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Missouri Democratic State Committee is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Its FEC record names Democratic Grassroots Victory Fund as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Missouri Democratic State Committee is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| $20K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $16.6K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $8K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to DUCKWORTH · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $2.5K |
$635.2K from 13 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 3 payments | $60K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · Connected to DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE · 8 payments | $28.5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $21.5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $3.5K |
$113.5K across 4 recipient committees, or 6.1% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $190.8K from 72 sources in all.
| 3 contributions · 0.4% | $1,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,010 contributions · 54% of ranked | $133,784 |
| Written instead of an employer · 78 contributions · 15% of ranked | $38,090 |
| 2 contributions · 4% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $6,500 |
| 21 contributions · 2% of ranked | $5,017 |
| 1 contribution · 1% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1% of ranked | $2,400 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $2,250 |
A further $2,106 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($212,057) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 902 contributions · 40% of ranked | $99,271 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 120 contributions · 15% of ranked | $36,494 |
| 61 contributions · 9.4% of ranked | $23,300 |
| 2 contributions · 4% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 21 contributions · 2% of ranked | $5,017 |
| 1 contribution · 2% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $4,450 |
A further $2,006 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($212,057) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $554,869
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 376 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
16 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $32,964 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 payments · 9.5% of all spending | $177,827 |
| 27 payments · 6.7% of all spending | $124,740 |
| 3 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $60,000 |
| 16 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $34,469 |
| 11 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $32,353 |
| 10 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $28,556 |
| 8 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $28,500 |
| 2 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $21,500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.