Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACCorporationOmaha, NebraskaActive
Connected organization: HDR, Inc.
Political fund of HDR, Inc.
HDR, Inc. is an American design and engineering company based in Omaha, Nebraska. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00103903 · files monthly
“As an employee-owned firm, we strive toward an inclusive, sustainable future and to elevate our communities, industry and professions through human-inspired technical and creative solutions.”
HDR, Inc., the organization this committee is the political fund of, hdrinc.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 54 | $215,000 | $0 | $215,000 | 55% |
| Democratic | 25 | $108,000 | $0 | $108,000 | 27% |
| Other or unresolved | 19 | $71,250 | $0 | $71,250 | 18% |
| Shown support | 98 | $394,250 | $0 | $394,250 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 25 | $108K · 14% |
| Republican candidates | 54 | $215K · 27% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 20 | $81.3K · 10% |
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $5.5K · 0.7% |
| Other party committees | 3 | $135K · 17% |
| Other PACs and committees | 47 | $252.6K · 32% |
| All recipients | 150 | $797.4K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 14 | $64.5K |
| Nebraska | 7 | $54.5K |
| Texas | 5 | $18.5K |
| Illinois | 7 | $18.5K |
| New York | 4 | $18K |
| South Dakota | 3 | $17.5K |
| Kansas | 3 | $16.5K |
| Florida |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 13,887 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,605,141
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,818 contributions · 15% | $153,099 |
| 1,941 contributions · 15% | $148,139 |
| 1,152 contributions · 7.7% |
Total reported disbursements $1,565,820
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $150.9K, February 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
HDR, Inc. is an American design and engineering company based in Omaha, Nebraska. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
HDR, Inc. Employee Owners PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| 4 |
| $15.5K |
The largest 8 of 35 states.
Bars drawn to $60K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
$5K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $60K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $60K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $20K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $20K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $20K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 1 payment | $15K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BRITT · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to FISCHER · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PADILLA · 2 payments | $10K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FREE STATE PAC · 2 payments | $10K |
From the 157 largest of 158 recipient committees: $797.4K, or 51% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $78,413 |
| 979 contributions · 7.3% | $74,671 |
| 590 contributions · 4.4% | $45,010 |
| 631 contributions · 4% | $41,215 |
| 510 contributions · 3.5% | $35,225 |
| 483 contributions · 3.4% | $34,760 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9,996 contributions · 71% of ranked | $719,739 |
| 1,019 contributions · 8% of ranked | $81,502 |
| 1,110 contributions · 8% of ranked | $81,474 |
| 569 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $38,942 |
| 443 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $32,352 |
| 167 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $25,273 |
| 179 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $14,465 |
| 164 contributions · 1% of ranked | $10,035 |
A further $2,184 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($525,968) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 151 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $19,835 |
| 320 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $17,534 |
| 230 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $15,347 |
| 174 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $12,165 |
| 125 contributions · 2% of ranked | $11,130 |
| 87 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $10,220 |
| 21 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $8,034 |
| 74 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $6,640 |
A further $2,184 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($525,968) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $777,610
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 285 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 3.8% of all spending | $60,000 |
| 2 payments · 3.8% of all spending | $60,000 |
| 1 payment · 1.3% of all spending | $20,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $20,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $20,000 |
| 1 payment · 1% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.6% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.6% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.