FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00072025 · files monthly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$1.6M raised, $1.4M spent, $349.1K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
61% from donors giving over $200 · 39% from donors giving $200 or less · largest donor Natasha Patterson, $8.8K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$911K given to candidates and committees, the largest to DCCC ($30K) · 72% of its support to Democrats, 22% to Republicans. See where it goes
Lobbying
National Rural Letter Carriers' Association lobbied on 2 issues. See lobbying
Audits and penalties
1 administrative fine, published by the FEC
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$736K to 154 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $736,000
Democratic 72%
Republican 22%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Democratic
102
$530,500
$0
$530,500
72%
Republican
41
$159,000
$0
$159,000
22%
Other or unresolved
9
$36,500
$0
$36,500
5%
Independent
2
$10,000
$0
$10,000
1.4%
Shown support
154
$736,000
$0
$736,000
100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$911,000 in 294 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
102
$530.5K · 58%
Republican candidates
41
$159K · 17%
Other or unresolved candidates
11
$46.5K · 5.1%
Other party committees
3
$75K · 8.2%
Other PACs and committees
19
$100K · 11%
All recipients
176
$911K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
California
19
$86.5K
New York
11
$60K
Pennsylvania
13
$48.5K
Ohio
7
$44K
Texas
8
$42K
Virginia
6
$38.5K
Michigan
7
$33.5K
Massachusetts
4
$31K
The largest 8 of 42 states.
Recipients 176
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nick Langworthy3 receipts, latest Jun 23, 2026Langworthy for Congress · H2NY23228$10K
Greg Landsman3 receipts, latest Feb 17, 2026Landsman for Congress · H2OH01194$10K
Michael R. Turner3 receipts, latest Jul 29, 2026Citizens for Turner · H2OH03067$10K
Jeffrey Alan Merkley2 receipts, latest May 28, 2026Jeff Merkley for Oregon · S8OR00207$10K
Mark Robert Warner2 receipts, latest Jun 23, 2026Friends of Mark Warner · S6VA00093$10K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 14,168 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $890.9K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$612,40039%
Other receiptsInterest, dividends and other income the committee files on a line of its own.$310<0.1%
Where it came from
Washington County Rural Letter Carrier Association1 receipt, latest Mar 12, 2025 · Fairview, Pennsylvania$300
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $1,568,310
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $890,909 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $5.7K
$5.7K+
$23K+
$51.6K+
$91.8K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Florida1,955 contributions · 16%
$143,465
Texas1,015 contributions · 7%
$62,673
Ohio622 contributions · 5.6%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $1,397,633 reported
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$873,00062%
Paid to
DCCC2 payments · latest Mar 30, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$30,000
DSCC2 payments · latest Mar 30, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION$30,000
NRCC3 payments · latest Jun 4, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION$15,000
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$434,53731%
Paid to
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$88,9326.4%
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$1,164<0.1%
Total reported disbursements $1,397,633
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $1,237,588 itemized
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$925,00075%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$911,000
CONTRIBUTION TO 501(C)(7)$14,000
Paid to
DCCC$30,000
DSCC$30,000
NRCC$15,000
National Democratic Club$14,000
Friends of Sherrod Brown$10,000
Equality PAC$10,000
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$151,25212%
Filed as
Spending over time
$1.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $207.7K, June 2025.
$1.4M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
1630 DUKE STREET2ND FLOORALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314-3465
Audits and penalties
1 administrative fine
Audits and penalties
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Fines assessed
1
Penalties assessed
$900
Administrative fines
Late 12G report, 2008$900 assessed
Determined Jul 9, 2009 · Paid In Full · Challenged: RTB Finding and Fine Upheld
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
LobbyingWhat does its sponsor lobby on?
What National Rural Letter Carriers' Association lobbies on 2026 reports
Besides giving through its PAC, National Rural Letter Carriers' Association pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$20K
Quarterly reports read
5
Bills it named
6
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Postalin 4 report entries · 6 bills named
In its own words
Support for the Federal Retirement Fairness Act H.R. 1522 Support H.R. 3011, USPS Shipping Equity Act Support H.Res. 70/S.Res 147 (USPS Anti Privatization Resolution) Support for H.R. 1065/S. 463, Protect Our Letter Carriers Act of 2025 Support for robust rural delivery Support for an increase in USPS borrowing authority, investment flexibility for USPS retirement funds, and a fairer allocation of USPS Civil Service Retirement (CSRS) obligations.
Opposition to USPS' Rule on Ballot Mail for Federal Elections
Support H.R. 3011, USPS Shipping Equity Act Support H.Res. 70/S.Res 147 (USPS Anti Privatization Resolution) Support for H.R. 1065/S. 463, Protect Our Letter Carriers Act of 2025 Support for robust rural delivery Support for an increase in USPS borrowing authority, investment flexibility for USPS retirement funds, and a fairer allocation of USPS Civil Service Retirement (CSRS) obligations.
Support H.R. 3011, USPS Shipping Equity Act Support H.Res. 70/S.Res 147 (USPS Anti Privatization Resolution) Support for H.R. 1065/S. 463, Protect Our Letter Carriers Act of 2025 Support for rural delivery generally, and congressional assistance to stabilize the USPS.
Support H.R. 3011, USPS Shipping Equity Act Support H.Res. 70/S.Res 147 (USPS Anti Privatization Resolution) Support for H.R. 1065/S. 463, Protect Our Letter Carriers Act of 2025 Opposition to USPSs Final Rule on Ballot Mail for Federal Elections
Support for the Federal Retirement Fairness Act H.R. 1522 Support H.R. 3011, USPS Shipping Equity Act Support H.Res. 70/S.Res 147 (USPS Anti Privatization Resolution) Support for H.R. 1065/S. 463, Protect Our Letter Carriers Act of 2025 Support for robust rural delivery Support for an increase in USPS borrowing authority, investment flexibility for USPS retirement funds, and a fairer allocation of USPS Civil Service Retirement (CSRS) obligations.
Opposition to USPS' Rule on Ballot Mail for Federal Elections
● Support for the Federal Retirement Fairness Act H.R. 1522
Young Government Affairs LLCLobbying firm · 2 reports$20K
I Street AdvocatesLobbying firm · 3 reportsNot reported
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “NATIONAL RURAL LETTER CARRIERS' ASSOCIATION”, found by searching “NATIONAL RURAL LETTER CARRIERS ASSOCIATION”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 27, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
NATIONAL RURAL LETTER CARRIERS' ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
Filings covered
Through Oct 14, 2026
Data source
FEC bulk filing data
National Rural Letter Carriers' Association PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names National Rural Letter Carriers' Association as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
National Rural Letter Carriers' Association PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
$911K across 178 recipient committees, or 65% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
$49,817
Georgia1,197 contributions · 5%
$44,905
Missouri629 contributions · 4.6%
$40,922
Illinois630 contributions · 4.2%
$37,634
Wisconsin346 contributions · 3.7%
$33,221
Pennsylvania593 contributions · 3.6%
$31,801
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Usps12,658 contributions · 89% of ranked
$790,203
Nrlca1,480 contributions · 11% of ranked
$94,078
HomemakerWritten instead of an employer · 5 contributions · 0.6% of ranked
$5,083
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 2 contributions · <0.1% of ranked
$40
A further $1,505 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($612,400) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Letter Carrier12,261 contributions · 86% of ranked
$767,449
Ft-steward750 contributions · 5.8% of ranked
$51,207
Area Steward497 contributions · 2.7% of ranked
$23,779
Rural Carrier252 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$15,753
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 127 contributions · 1.2% of ranked
$10,435
Pt-steward207 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$9,788
HomemakerWritten instead of an occupation · 5 contributions · 0.6% of ranked
$5,083
RO2 contributions · 0.5% of ranked
$4,100
A further $1,505 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($612,400) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$100,0168.1%
Filed as
INKIND: MISC. GIFTS$71,680
INKIND: GIFT BASKET$6,377
PAC SUPPLIES - INVOICE # 4738-1$4,648
INKIND: GIFT BASKETS$4,265
INKIND: GIFT CARDS$4,195
INKIND: GIFT CARD$2,799
PAC SUPPLIES. - INVOICE #5061-1$1,925
PAC SUPPLIES - INVOICE # 88609011$1,748
INKIND: MISC GIFTS$432
INKIND: MISC. GIFT$430
INKIND: ELVIS MEMORABILIA$250
INKIND: SILENT AUCTION GIFTS$223
Paid to
Mosaic$8,320
Smith, Carolyn$5,061
Mott, Melissa a$4,617
Johnson, Mardee$3,285
Bagwell, Leslie$2,947
Patterson, Natasha$2,257
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$42,3003.4%
Filed as
DONOR GIFTS - INVOICE #4881-1$25,000
EVENT SPONSOR$17,000
INKIND: EVENT TICKETS$300
Paid to
Mosaic$25,000
Capitol Hill Club$17,000
Schwarck, Vicki L$300
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$15,1421.2%
Filed as
BANK SERVICE FEE$9,158
MERCHANT FEE$3,076
ANALYSIS FEE$1,884
MERCHANT FEES$1,025
Paid to
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.$15,142
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$1,7360.1%
Filed as
INKIND: SIGNS$435
INKIND: MAIL BOX$375
INKIND: MAILBOX$250
INKIND: MAILBOX BANK$240
INKIND: FRAMED PRINTS$166
INKIND: SIGN$125
INKIND: ART PRINT$125
INKIND: METAL SIGN$20
Paid to
Shumard, Pamela$275
Reed, Connie D$250
Holloway, Victoria$240
Choate, Regina a$180
Libell, Mary B.$166
Ayers, Dawn E$160
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$1,3330.1%
Filed as
INKIND: TV$1,013
INKIND: VIDEO GAME$320
Paid to
Hunter, Robert L$671
Sharpe, Thomas D$662
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$754<0.1%
Filed as
INKIND: TRAVEL PACKAGE$497
INKIND: HOTEL$157
INKIND: PARKING PASS$100
Paid to
Steele, Lisa$497
Ayers, Dawn E$157
Glancy, Jackie$100
Refunds and redesignationsContributions returned to donors or reassigned to another election.$55<0.1%
Filed as
RETURNED REFUND$55
Paid to
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.$55
Total itemized disbursements $1,237,588
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,356 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.