Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00042622 · files monthly
4 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Republicans are fighting to build a freer, stronger, and more prosperous Commonwealth for all!
You can easily opt-out at any time.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · massgop.com
Heading as listed on massgop.com ↗ (opens massgop.com at this heading)
The MassGOP is strengthening and expanding its Election Integrity program ahead of the 2026 midterms and the 2028 presidential election.
Through legal action, grassroots engagement, and operational discipline, we are working to protect the integrity of Massachusetts elections and ensure every legal vote is counted, counted once, and counted fairly.
Mission Statement & Goals ↗ (opens massgop.com/election-integrity at this heading)
The Committee works to protect the legitimacy of Massachusetts elections by supporting sound processes, transparency, and public confidence.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · massgop.com/election-integrity
Heading as listed on massgop.com ↗ (opens massgop.com at this heading)
Support secure, practical photo-ID standards that protect access to the ballot while strengthening confidence in elections.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · massgop.com/election-integrity
Promote transparent, regularly maintained voter-registration records and effective local review.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · massgop.com/election-integrity
Advance accountable ballot handling, secure observation, and clear processes from application through count.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · massgop.com/election-integrity
The Election Integrity and Registration Committee protects the legitimacy of elections in the Commonwealth by following sound processes and guidance aimed at reducing the risk of voter fraud.
Voter information should be transparent and available for public scrutiny and analysis.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · massgop.com/election-integrity
The Committee supports accurate local voter records, including regular review of registration data and efforts to address duplicate or outdated records.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · massgop.com/election-integrity
The Committee supports transparent and accountable ballot handling, local committee coordination, poll-worker and observer training, and working knowledge of election laws and standards.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · massgop.com/election-integrity
Heading as listed on massgop.com ↗ (opens massgop.com at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 6 payments | $166K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 4 payments | $53.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $28.9K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ZENECA INC. · 2 payments | $10K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $7.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PFIZER INC. · 1 payment | $1K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $400 |
$267.3K from 7 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 8 payments | $189.4K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 1 payment | $28.9K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to SMUCKER VICTORY COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $4.7K |
$223K across 3 recipient committees, or 19% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 122 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $409K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 4 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $1,172,159
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 112 contributions · 94% | $383,534 |
| 2 contributions · 4.9% | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.7% | $3,000 |
| 3 contributions · 0.4% | $1,500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.1% | $500 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% | $250 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total reported disbursements $1,159,174
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $88.4K, March 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
1994 cycleReport released Dec 4, 1996
Late M6 report, 2003$2.5K assessed
Case 1069 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Massachusetts Republican Party is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Its FEC record names NRSC Victory as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Massachusetts Republican Party is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 18 contributions · 11% of ranked | $45,411 |
| Written instead of an employer · 22 contributions · 11% of ranked | $44,873 |
| 2 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 3 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.4% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $250 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($11,998) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 11 contributions · 21% of ranked | $84,520 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 22 contributions · 11% of ranked | $44,873 |
| 6 contributions · 10% of ranked | $41,250 |
| 3 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $22,500 |
| 3 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 3 contributions · 5% of ranked | $20,500 |
| 2 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 3 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $20,000 |
A further $250 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($11,998) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $280,895
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 254 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 8 payments · 16% of all spending | $189,397 |
| 1 payment · 2.5% of all spending | $28,888 |
| 138 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $9,763 |
| 1 payment · 0.6% of all spending | $7,437 |
| 2 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $6,050 |
| 1 payment · 0.4% of all spending | $4,725 |
| 2 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $3,608 |
| 4 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $2,813 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.