Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
Party committee (qualified)Raleigh, North CarolinaActive
Connected organization: 11TH Congressional District Republican Party
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00038505 · files monthly
“THANK YOU for helping the NCGOP keep North Carolina "red" this election. What issues motivated you to vote this cycle?”
North Carolina Republican Party, on its own site, action.nc.gop
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
2 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
...the strength of our nation lies with the individual and that each person’s dignity, freedom, ability and responsibility must be honored.
We Believe…in equal rights, equal justice and equal opportunity for all, regardless of race, creed, sex, age or disability.
We Believe…free enterprise and encouraging individual initiative have brought this nation opportunity, economic growth and prosperity.
We Believe…government must practice fiscal responsibility and allow individuals to keep more of their own money they earn.
We Believe…the proper role of government is to provide for the people only those critical functions that cannot be performed by individuals or private organizations, and that the best government is that which governs least.
We Believe…the most effective, responsible and responsive government is government closest to the people.
We Believe…Americans must retain the principles that have made us strong while developing new and innovative ideas to meet the challenges of changing times.
We Believe…Americans value and should preserve our national strength and pride while working to extend peace, freedom and human rights throughout the world.
We Believe…the Republican Party is the best vehicle for translating these ideals into positive and successful principles of government.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nc.gop/about
Heading as listed on nc.gop/about ↗ (opens nc.gop/about at this heading)
Election integrity forms the foundation of every true democracy.
It guarantees that election results truly reflect the will of the people.
When doubts arise about the fairness of our elections, public trust in the entire system suffers, and the legitimacy of those elected is called into question.
We must protect the ballot from any form of tampering, fraud, or manipulation.
North Carolinians should feel complete trust in our elections.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nc.gop/election_integrity
Heading as listed on nc.gop/election_integrity ↗ (opens nc.gop/election_integrity at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 14 payments | $776.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 6 payments | $349.6K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NC STRONG BUCKHOUT, HARRIGAN, KNOTT, MCDOWELL, MOORE · 2 payments | $305K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NC STRONG BUCKHOUT, HARRIGAN, KNOTT, MCDOWELL, MOORE · 2 payments | $225.1K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 6 payments | $170K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to PIT CREW FUND · 1 payment | $85K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 7 payments | $36.9K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $25.7K |
$2M from 15 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $300K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 4 payments | $117.3K |
| 4 payments | $84K |
| 2 payments | $51.1K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 1 payment | $25.7K |
From the 5 largest of 6 recipient committees: $578.2K, or 12% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 3,999 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.3M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 4 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $5.8K from 4 sources in all.
Total reported receipts $5,293,662
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,752 contributions · 96% | $1,269,340 |
| 338 contributions · 1.5% | $20,192 |
| 245 contributions · 0.5% | $6,576 |
Total reported disbursements $4,845,766
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$4.8M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $659.9K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
1998 cycleReport released Jan 31, 2001
1982 cycleReport released Mar 28, 1983
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
North Carolina Republican Party is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Its FEC record names 11TH Congressional District Republican Party as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
North Carolina Republican Party is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments |
| $11.4K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $8.4K |
| Party committee (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5.2K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $2.2K |
| 104 contributions · 0.4% |
| $5,226 |
| 35 contributions · 0.3% | $3,332 |
| 48 contributions · 0.2% | $2,978 |
| 44 contributions · 0.2% | $2,715 |
| 24 contributions · 0.1% | $1,752 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,083 contributions · 30% of ranked | $354,053 |
| 1 contribution · 17% of ranked | $203,802 |
| Written instead of an employer · 328 contributions · 16% of ranked | $183,283 |
| 1 contribution · 4.2% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.2% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 5 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $15,618 |
| 4 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $12,463 |
| 18 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $9,374 |
A further $35,999 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($725,191) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,776 contributions · 20% of ranked | $248,444 |
| 34 contributions · 19% of ranked | $227,628 |
| 38 contributions · 9.3% of ranked | $112,877 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 50 contributions · 6.9% of ranked | $83,555 |
| 86 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $43,674 |
| 52 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $37,122 |
| 40 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $21,529 |
| 4 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $14,899 |
A further $28,413 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($725,191) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $2,819,471
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 4,119 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
75 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $23,152 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 6.2% of all spending | $300,000 |
| 283 payments · 5.9% of all spending | $284,553 |
| 23 payments · 4% of all spending | $193,401 |
| 4 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $117,321 |
| 24 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $111,805 |
| 13 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $107,063 |
| 383 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $103,083 |
| 87 payments · 2% of all spending | $98,575 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.