Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › Iowa U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
DemocraticU.S. SenateIowa
Has not served in Congress
No campaign site or public profiles are attached to this record yet.
Zach Wahls’ words are not shown
Campaign committee · 2025–2026 · latest available filing · Official FEC bulk data
99¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 7 reports ($3.9M of $3.9M). Cash on hand went from $626.3K on Jun 30, 2025 to $29.4K on Sep 30, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $656,638 | $30,288 | $626,350 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $646,658 | $687,963 | $585,045 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $742,294 | $593,858 | $733,481 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $1,122,081 | $800,157 | $1,055,406 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $503,535 | $857,954 | $700,986 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $221,937 | $684,157 | $238,766 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $32,509 | $241,856 | $29,419 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No receipts reported
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
33% of the money placed by state came from inside Iowa: $939.3K of $2.8M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4,222 contributions · 33% | $939,296 |
| 932 contributions · 24% | $676,089 |
| 385 contributions · 8.8% | $249,160 |
| 276 contributions · 5.6% | $160,578 |
| 196 contributions · 4.7% | $134,559 |
| 256 contributions · 3.8% | $109,230 |
| 153 contributions · 2.1% | $60,993 |
| 165 contributions · 1.9% | $53,659 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 44 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 4,370 contributions · 39% of ranked | $842,586 |
| Written instead of an employer · 569 contributions · 13% of ranked | $288,281 |
| Written instead of an employer · 174 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $99,830 |
| 134 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $55,592 |
| 10 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $31,400 |
| 7 contributions · 1% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 11 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $15,500 |
| 5 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $15,000 |
A further $323,846 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments | $614,789 |
| 15 payments | $596,330 |
| 58 payments | $164,659 |
| 11 payments | $141,331 |
| 8 payments | $133,802 |
| 61 payments | $129,606 |
| 28 payments | $123,118 |
| 10 payments | $121,100 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Not read yet
Lost · 71,895 votes (37%) · 2 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Election November 3, 2026 · 24 polls of this matchup
Josh Turek and Ashley Hinson are even · average gap, 5 latest nonpartisan polls
Each dot is a poll. The line is the median of the 5 latest nonpartisan polls. How polls are read
Pairings that are not the race on the ballot: candidates who lost a primary or withdrew, or a party's unnamed nominee. They are not charted.
Primary June 2, 2026 · 1 poll
Josh Turek won by 25.2 points. No poll naming both Josh Turek and Zach Wahls ended in the 21 days before the vote.
| Poll | Josh Turek | Zach Wahls | Lead | vs. result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Result | 62.5% | 37.3% | Josh Turek +25.2 |
June 2, 2026 · Result (unofficial)
Poll data from The New York Times, licensed CC BY 4.0 · Updated October 28, 2026 · 16 polls paid for by a party or campaign are left out
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 4,380 contributions · 34% of ranked | $826,719 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 344 contributions · 7% of ranked | $173,403 |
| 265 contributions · 6.1% of ranked | $149,764 |
| 132 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $69,830 |
| 28 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $53,325 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 85 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $50,843 |
| 178 contributions · 2% of ranked | $50,532 |
| 85 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $42,361 |
A further $236,850 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total itemized disbursements $3,475,780
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid.
All 993 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.