Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NC-03 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, NC-03
Has not served in Congress
6 priorities from raymondsmithfornc.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
The cost of living has gotten out of control while politicians in DC focus on lining the pockets of their billionaire donors. Eastern North Carolina families know about hard work and should be able to afford groceries, housing, and healthcare without sacrificing the basics. In Congress, Raymond will focus on lowering the cost of necessities and raising the standard of living for all North Carolinians. By focusing on affordability, job creation, and infrastructure we can build a better future for all our neighbors.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · raymondsmithfornc.com/platform
Heading as listed on raymondsmithfornc.com ↗ (opens raymondsmithfornc.com at this heading)
Right now, it seems like everything in Congress is controlled by billionaires, lobbyists, and special interest groups. Members of Congress are sitting in their office trading stocks instead of delivering for constituents, and places like Eastern North Carolina are suffering because of it. It’s time that we push major campaign finance reform, bring an end to Citizens United, and ban stock trading from members of Congress. We must fight corruption from both parties in all forms.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · raymondsmithfornc.com/platform
In Congress, Raymond will work to build a healthcare system that brings down costs, expands access, and makes quality care affordable for more people. As a State Representative, he worked across the aisle to reform the healthcare system to focus on patients over profits. Eastern North Carolina deserves a member of Congress who will expand healthcare access in rural areas while keeping care affordable.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · raymondsmithfornc.com/platform
For too long Eastern North Carolina’s infrastructure has been an afterthought to politicians in D.C. Raymond will fight for our fair share of project funding and investment. We deserve access to modern infrastructure that can move our economy forward, such as broadband internet access, as well as major investments in floodwater resilience and prevention.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · raymondsmithfornc.com/platform
As a combat veteran, Raymond knows first-hand the struggles of returning to civilian life after serving our country. In Congress, he will work across the aisle to ensure America’s veterans and soldiers get the benefits and respect they deserve. By improving the VA, expanding childcare access for the families of service members, and addressing the base housing crisis, we can ensure that we can protect those who risked their lives to protect our country.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · raymondsmithfornc.com/platform
Quality public education is the best investment we can make in the next generation, and in Congress, Raymond will fight to protect the fundamental right to a sound, basic education. His experience as an educator and a member of the Wayne County Board of Education showed him the importance of local control of schools, but the federal government still plays a critical role in general funding, special education, and protecting civil rights.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · raymondsmithfornc.com/platform
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00930784
88¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($322K of $366.6K). Cash on hand went from $19.7K on Feb 11, 2026 to $44.3K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 11, 2026 | $61,007 | $34,912 | $19,730 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $54,660 | $33,549 | $41,091 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $107,452 | $69,007 | $73,711 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $120,731 | $124,797 | $81,165 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $22,731 | $59,714 | $44,282 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
19 endorsers listed on Raymond Smith Jr.’s own campaign site: 14 officials, 5 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
State Senator · NC Senate District 16
Alderwoman · Town of Fremont
State Representative · NC House District 11
State Representative · NC House District 32
State Representative · NC House District 61
State Representative · NC House District 31
Former State Representative · NC House District 38
State Representative · NC House District 38
Advanced · 23,552 votes (57%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 269 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $106.9K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 25 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $73.1K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $366,581
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
77% of the money placed by state came from inside North Carolina: $81.1K of $105.9K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 216 contributions · 77% | $81,131 |
| 4 contributions · 5.4% | $5,750 |
| 11 contributions · 3.5% | $3,669 |
| 1 contribution · 3.3% | $3,500 |
| 6 contributions · 2.8% | $2,950 |
| 3 contributions · 2.4% | $2,567 |
| 3 contributions · 1.5% | $1,550 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% | $1,000 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 18 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 152 contributions · 46% of ranked | $45,173 |
| Written instead of an employer · 14 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $6,400 |
| 2 contributions · 6.1% of ranked | $6,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.6% of ranked | $3,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 6 contributions · 3% of ranked | $2,950 |
| 2 contributions · 2% of ranked | $2,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1% of ranked | $1,000 |
A further $8,500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($121,001) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Total itemized disbursements $195,676
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 140 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
3 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $2,107 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 8.8% of all spending | $28,375 |
| 9 payments · 7.3% of all spending | $23,585 |
| 8 payments · 5.9% of all spending | $19,121 |
| 3 payments · 5.7% of all spending | $18,421 |
| 11 payments · 4.9% of all spending | $15,875 |
| 1 payment · 4% of all spending | $12,873 |
| 3 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $11,375 |
| 12 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $7,376 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 150 contributions · 43% of ranked | $44,454 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 4 contributions · 7% of ranked | $7,250 |
| 12 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $5,500 |
| 8 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $4,750 |
| 1 contribution · 3.4% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 3.4% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 7 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $2,550 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 6 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $2,369 |
A further $4,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($121,001) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.