Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › MO-08 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, MO-08
Has not served in Congress
4 priorities from reichardforrep.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
The working class is falling behind, and MO-08—Missouri's poorest and most rural district—is feeling the pressure hardest. Families here can't afford more costs piled on top of farming challenges, healthcare accessibility or outdated infrastructure.
- Back pro-labor bills like the PRO Act to protect lower- and middle-class families by strengthening worker rights against employers, banning union-busting tactics, and ensuring fair bargaining for better pay and safer conditions.
- Address trade, tariffs, and cuts from DOGE and the 'Big, Beautiful Bill': Recent shake-ups have backfired in our rural district. Tariffs and soured trade deals added ~$2,400/yr to average family costs (up to $4,000+ for farming families hit by export losses and higher inputs). Add impacts from DOGE workforce slashes and the 'Big Beautiful Bill' provisions, and families face another ~$1,500/year in higher utilities, health, and food costs. We need fair trade that protects American workers, small businesses and farmers—not policies that hurt them.
Don't let labels like "progressive" divide us. Progressive issues are working-class issues: stronger unions, lower family costs, and politicians who put people first.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · reichardforrep.com/issues
Heading as listed on reichardforrep.com/issues ↗ (opens reichardforrep.com/issues at this heading)
Our veterans served for us—and now their benefits are under attack. In Missouri's 8th District, where too many rural veterans wait too long for care, we can't let that stand. As a disabled Iraq War veteran, I know the sacrifice firsthand. Pending legislation and actions deserve full support to deliver what was promised:
- The Major Richard Star Act — Ensuring combat-injured veterans receive both their earned military retirement and VA disability benefits, without offsets that force impossible choices after great sacrifice.
- The Full Cost of War Act — Requiring Congress to authorize VA funding for veterans' care before any declaration of war or use of military force—because we must account for the human and financial toll upfront.
- Restoring cut VA positions — Reversing reductions in an already overworked, understaffed VA system so veterans get the timely, quality care they deserve—not longer wait times or backlogs.
*As a product of forever wars, I support diplomacy first and foremost.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · reichardforrep.com/issues/stand-up-for-our-veterans
Heading as listed on reichardforrep.com/issues ↗ (opens reichardforrep.com/issues at this heading)
Traveling across Missouri's 8th District the two issues that came up the most were Healthcare and Education. Dozens of Missouri's rural hospitals are at extreme risk of closing. One third of Missouri's public schools have moved to 4-day school weeks. Both are severely underfunded. The worst part -- there are dozens of bills stalled in Congress that would fix these issues including:
- Medicare-For-All and several stepping stone bills to get us there without shocking the system.
- Breaking up medical monopolies where a single company owns everything from the insurance to medication and even physicians leaving zero room for negotiation.
- Funding rural healthcare including hospitals and clinics.
- Ending private education vouchers systems that have been taking resources away from public education.
- Creating fair wages and incentives to retain our educators.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · reichardforrep.com/issues/healthcare-education
Documented abuses of our freedoms are growing at a rapid pace, while power consolidates unchecked. In Missouri's 8th District, where rural families value hard work, independence, and constitutional rights, we must fight back.
- Restore and reinforce checks and balances among our three co-equal branches of government. This is not a land for authoritarians or kings—power must answer to the people.
- Hold those in power accountable for trampling rights. No one is above the law—whether in Washington or local agencies.
- Push to de-fund and abolish ICE. Immigration reform may be needed, but the brutal tactics performed by ICE are inexcusable. We deserve an enforcement system that respects rights and follows due process.
- Join coalitions like Take BAC Congress - National candidates from across 40 states pledged to end Citizens United, pushing an enforceable code of ethics for the Supreme Court, and checking career politicians by setting Congressional Term limits with a moratorium on lobbying plus banning stock trading.
Our government is meant to be by the people, for the people. Getting dark money controlled by the millionaires and billionaires, foreign interests groups and corporations will put us back on that path!
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · reichardforrep.com/issues/bringing-real-accountability
FEC filings, Dec 22, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00933739
76¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($21.3K of $28K). Cash on hand went from $1.3K on Mar 31, 2026 to $6.7K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $2,253 | $991 | $1,261 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $3,029 | $2,652 | $1,638 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $393 | $89 | $1,942 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $19,539 | $8,918 | $12,563 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $2,745 | $8,656 | $6,652 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
10 endorsers listed on Christopher Reichard’s own campaign site: 1 party, 2 unions, 7 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 15,334 votes (54%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 23 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $6.6K.
The largest of the committees is listed. In all, 1 committee contribution was filed this cycle, totaling $150. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $27,958
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
99% of the money placed by state came from inside Missouri: $6.5K of $6.6K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 contributions · 99% | $6,518 |
| 1 contribution · 0.8% | $50 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 2 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 13 contributions · 64% of ranked | $4,202 |
| Written instead of an employer · 7 contributions · 17% of ranked | $1,131 |
| 1 contribution · 16% of ranked | $1,030 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked | $105 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked | $100 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($12,471) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 13 contributions · 64% of ranked | $4,202 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 7 contributions · 17% of ranked | $1,131 |
| 1 contribution · 16% of ranked | $1,030 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked | $105 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked | $100 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($12,471) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Total itemized disbursements $18,994
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 69 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
2 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $629 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 32% of all spending | $6,795 |
| 44 payments · 14% of all spending | $3,067 |
| 1 payment · 14% of all spending | $3,018 |
| 1 payment · 5.1% of all spending | $1,088 |
| 1 payment · 3.6% of all spending | $763 |
| 2 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $746 |
| 1 payment · 3.3% of all spending | $700 |
| 1 payment · 2.9% of all spending | $618 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.