Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CT-05 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, CT-05
Has not served in Congress
6 priorities from chrissheaforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Connecticut needs a representative who understands the challenges facing our state and the Northeast. From high energy costs and overregulation to protecting local industries, small businesses, and working families. Chris Shea will fight for policies that strengthen Connecticut’s economy, defend our communities, and ensure our region’s priorities are not ignored in Washington.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · chrissheaforcongress.com/issues
Protecting families starts with safe communities, secure borders, and a culture that puts the future of our country first. Chris Shea will fight to stop illegal immigration, crack down on the flow of drugs and crime into our communities, and stand against radical woke ideologies that threaten our children’s future, undermine parental rights, and weaken the family values that keep Connecticut great.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · chrissheaforcongress.com/issues
Connecticut families are being squeezed from every direction by high electricity bills, heavy taxes, and rising housing costs. Chris believes the cost of living in our state has become unsustainable for working families, young professionals, and seniors on fixed incomes. He will fight for policies that lower energy costs, reduce the tax burden, and promote practical housing solutions that help more people afford to live and work in Connecticut. That means supporting a stronger economy, reducing unnecessary barriers that drive up costs, and making it easier for families to build a stable future here at home.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · chrissheaforcongress.com/issues
Illegal immigration threatens the safety and security of Connecticut families. Chris will always fight to secure the border, enforce our immigration laws, and stop the flow of fentanyl and other deadly drugs into our neighborhoods. As a firefighter and first responder, he has seen firsthand the devastation fentanyl has caused in communities and the toll it has taken on families. He will fight to fund border patrol, support law enforcement, and put the safety of American families first.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · chrissheaforcongress.com/issues
Chris spent 33 years serving this country as a Navy SEAL, dedicating his life to protecting the United States and defending our interests around the world. He believes peace is secured through strength, not weakness, and that America must always maintain the military power, readiness, and resolve needed to deter our enemies. Chris believes America should stand with our ally Israel and support its right to self-defense. In Congress, he will advocate for American Military strength, support our troops and veterans, and ensure our nation remains strong, respected, and prepared to meet any threat.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · chrissheaforcongress.com/issues
Connecticut’s veterans have earned more than a “thanks for your service”, they deserve real support and timely access to the care and services they need. He started a non-profit to transition veterans into first responder roles and understands first-hand how important it is to make a career pathway for separating & retired veterans. Chris will fight to improve access to the VA, cut through bureaucratic delays, and make it easier for veterans to get quality healthcare, job opportunities, and the benefits they have earned through their service. He is committed to standing up for veterans and military families, reducing barriers for those building a life in Connecticut, and making sure the men and women who served our country are never forgotten.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · chrissheaforcongress.com/issues
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00935692
88¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 6 reports ($412.2K of $466K). Cash on hand went from $139.1K on Mar 31, 2026 to $53.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $163,323 | $24,220 | $139,103 |
| PRE-CONVENTION 2026 through Apr 25, 2026 | $33,884 | $54,561 | $118,427 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $104,379 | $55,346 | $167,460 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 22, 2026 | $10,089 | $31,933 | $145,617 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $119,294 | $192,150 | $72,761 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $34,994 | $53,986 | $53,768 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 10,414 votes (81%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 222 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $203.4K.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 2 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 3 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $45.8K.
The 10 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 11 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $25.8K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $465,963
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
58% of the money placed by state came from inside Connecticut: $117.3K of $203.4K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 150 contributions · 58% | $117,303 |
| 23 contributions · 16% | $33,320 |
| 2 contributions · 5.3% | $10,750 |
| 7 contributions · 4.3% | $8,789 |
| 1 contribution · 3.4% | $7,000 |
| 12 contributions · 2.7% | $5,446 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% | $5,000 |
| 4 contributions · 2.1% | $4,208 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 17 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 88 contributions · 41% of ranked | $82,086 |
| 4 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $10,600 |
| 1 contribution · 5.2% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 1 contribution · 5.2% of ranked | $10,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 19 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $8,660 |
| 1 contribution · 3.5% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.5% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $1,300 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($98,389) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $638 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $217,857
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 480 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
4 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $24,967 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 53 payments · 9.9% of all spending | $40,678 |
| 2 payments · 6.1% of all spending | $25,089 |
| 2 payments · 4.2% of all spending | $17,502 |
| 2 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $11,415 |
| 7 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $11,097 |
| 65 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $10,135 |
| 5 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 6 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $9,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 88 contributions · 41% of ranked | $82,086 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 12 contributions · 5.6% of ranked | $11,250 |
| 4 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $10,600 |
| 1 contribution · 5.2% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 1 contribution · 5.2% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 1 contribution · 3.5% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.5% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $3,750 |
A further $1,300 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($98,389) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.