Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-24 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, CA-24
Has not served in Congress
3 priorities from bobsmithforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Reliable. Affordable. Clean. Secure.
A balanced grid with reliable baseload power, coastline protection, and secure water storage and drought resilience. See what is planned off Morro Bay
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com
- Reliable baseload power alongside clean generation.
- Protect the coastline and our fisheries.
- Invest in storage, recycling, and drought resilience.
- Support Central Coast agriculture with dependable water.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bobsmithforcongress.com ↗ (opens bobsmithforcongress.com at this heading)
Compassion with order.
Secure the border, remove violent offenders, provide legal clarity for long term residents, and modernize agricultural and seasonal visas.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com
- Secure the border and stop the flow of fentanyl.
- Remove violent offenders without apology.
- Legal clarity for long term residents who work and pay taxes here.
- Modernize agricultural and seasonal visa programs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bobsmithforcongress.com ↗ (opens bobsmithforcongress.com at this heading)
Peace through strength.
Stop fentanyl at the source, lead in AI and cyber defense, and strengthen Vandenberg SFB and Naval Base Ventura County.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com
- Peace through strength and a mission ready force.
- Lead in artificial intelligence, space, and cyber defense.
- Strengthen Vandenberg Space Force Base and Naval Base Ventura County.
- Keep faith with veterans through accountable VA care.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bobsmithforcongress.com ↗ (opens bobsmithforcongress.com at this heading)
The American Dream, attainable again.
Cut wasteful spending, lower the cost of housing, energy, and food, and expand homeownership for working families.
- Audit and cut wasteful federal spending that fuels inflation.
- Expand housing supply and first time homeownership.
- Lower energy and grocery costs for working families.
- Protect Social Security and Medicare for the people who paid in.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/issues
Real careers and real opportunity.
Reading, math, and STEM excellence, vocational pathways, and research partnerships with UCSB and Cal Poly.
- Fundamentals first: reading, math, and STEM.
- Fund vocational and trade pathways, not just four year degrees.
- Partner with UCSB and Cal Poly on applied research.
- Transparency and parental involvement in local schools.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on bobsmithforcongress.com ↗ (opens bobsmithforcongress.com at this heading)
Housing and energy costs are the top pressure on Central Coast families, whatever their party registration.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/common-ground
Storage, recycling, and drought planning are engineering questions, not ideological ones.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/common-ground
Reading and math proficiency, and real pathways into trades and technical careers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/common-ground
Enforcement against violent crime and fentanyl trafficking, handled with competence and without cruelty.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/common-ground
Claims answered, appointments kept, promises honored. This is administration, not politics.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/common-ground
Clean water, protected beaches, working farms, and wildfire resilience for the next generation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/common-ground
A dedicated veterans caseworker in the district office and quarterly claims clinics in all three counties.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/veterans-for-bob
Real access to care close to home, peer support that works, and accountability for wait times.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/veterans-for-bob
Full implementation of exposure related benefits, and pressure on VA to stop making veterans prove the obvious.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/veterans-for-bob
Credential transfer, apprenticeships, and hiring partnerships with Central Coast employers and the bases.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/veterans-for-bob
Protect and expand veteran housing vouchers and address homelessness among veterans on the coast.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/veterans-for-bob
Defend the missions and jobs at Vandenberg Space Force Base and Naval Base Ventura County.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobsmithforcongress.com/veterans-for-bob
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00898882
84¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($289.5K of $346.7K). Cash on hand went from $11K on Mar 31, 2025 to $57.2K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $11,309 | $296 | $11,013 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $18,090 | $15,849 | $13,254 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $23,344 | $13,897 | $22,702 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $32,920 | $19,167 | $36,455 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $78,750 | $59,105 | $56,100 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $17,959 | $23,762 | $50,297 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $20,892 | $24,061 | $47,128 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $125,287 | $91,229 | $81,186 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $18,191 | $42,169 | $57,208 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 75,085 votes (36%) · 2 of 4 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 196 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $140.7K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 4 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $9K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $346,742
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
84% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $117.9K of $140.7K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 176 contributions · 84% | $117,936 |
| 4 contributions · 5% | $7,000 |
| 3 contributions · 3.6% | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% | $3,500 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% | $1,500 |
| 2 contributions · 0.7% | $1,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.7% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.7% | $1,000 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 13 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 112 contributions · 56% of ranked | $77,460 |
| Written instead of an employer · 14 contributions · 8.6% of ranked | $12,050 |
| 2 contributions · 5% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 12 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $2,491 |
A further $1,250 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($42,346) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $2,500 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $193,979
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 190 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
14 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $57,742 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 11 payments · 20% of all spending | $57,155 |
| 7 payments · 9.4% of all spending | $27,080 |
| 3 payments · 4.4% of all spending | $12,800 |
| 3 payments · 4.2% of all spending | $12,128 |
| 2 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $11,845 |
| 1 payment · 4% of all spending | $11,545 |
| 3 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $10,300 |
| 2 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $6,400 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 112 contributions · 56% of ranked | $77,460 |
| 5 contributions · 5.6% of ranked | $7,750 |
| 2 contributions · 5% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 3 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 11 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $2,387 |
| 3 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $2,250 |
A further $1,250 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($42,346) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.