Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › TX-38 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, TX-38
Has not served in Congress
25 priorities from melissaforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
- Save Social Security
- Improve foreign relations
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · melissaforcongress.com
Heading as listed on melissaforcongress.com ↗ (opens melissaforcongress.com at this heading)
- Properly fund public education
- Make tuition more affordable
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · melissaforcongress.com
Heading as listed on melissaforcongress.com ↗ (opens melissaforcongress.com at this heading)
- Defend democracy
- Make voting easier for everyone
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · melissaforcongress.com
Heading as listed on melissaforcongress.com ↗ (opens melissaforcongress.com at this heading)
- Embrace renewable energy innovation
- Proper flood mitigation
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · melissaforcongress.com
Heading as listed on melissaforcongress.com ↗ (opens melissaforcongress.com at this heading)
- Protect marginalized communities
- Invest in affordable housing
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · melissaforcongress.com
Heading as listed on melissaforcongress.com ↗ (opens melissaforcongress.com at this heading)
- Responsible gun ownership
- Prevent more mass shootings
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · melissaforcongress.com
Heading as listed on melissaforcongress.com ↗ (opens melissaforcongress.com at this heading)
- Give women control of their own bodies
- Universal healthcare (Medicare for All)
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · melissaforcongress.com
Heading as listed on melissaforcongress.com ↗ (opens melissaforcongress.com at this heading)
- More effective border management
- Address root causes of immigration
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · melissaforcongress.com
Heading as listed on melissaforcongress.com ↗ (opens melissaforcongress.com at this heading)
Inflation has been a major concern for everyone over the past few years. Supply chain disruptions, labor shortages, and corporate greed are all factors that have caused abnormally high inflation in almost all industries.
While the rest of the world still struggles with high inflation, the US has managed to bring it down to a more desirable level. I am hoping to continue smart policy that is proactive and not reactive.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · melissaforcongress.com/platform
With thousands of miles of coastal and international boundaries, Texas is a major center of international trade. Bad foreign policy can hurt our relationships with our trading partners, as well as hurt Americans financially.
Donald Trump’s trade war with China cost Americans $80 billion in new taxes. Governor Abbott cost Texas billions in lost revenue because of his border stunts. These xenophobic policies don’t help anyone. Good trade policy requires treating your trading partners with respect.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · melissaforcongress.com/platform
Of all 50 states, Texas ranks 49th in high school graduation rate with 84.4%. This is not a good look for Texas. With the recent takeover of HISD, Governor Abbott’s relentless push for vouchers, and the recent major cut in property taxes used for funding schools, it seems as though Texas Republicans want public education to fail.
Improper funding of public education is a major factor in the school to prison pipeline. Education is a tool that when used improperly, perpetuates systemic oppression against targeted groups. Instead of banning books and classes that teach about culture, we should be focusing on the future while learning from the past.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · melissaforcongress.com/platform
Students who wish to acquire advanced degrees should not be punished with a lifetime of debt. Going to college should be an option for all who wish to learn, and not a privilege for only the wealthy.
As other developed nations such as Germany and Norway provide tuition-free education to their residents, many brilliant American minds are priced out of the education they deserve. We need to make quality education more affordable and accessible so everyone can prosper.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · melissaforcongress.com/platform
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00836940
83¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($103K of $124.7K). Cash on hand went from $22.3K on Mar 31, 2025 to $44.4K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $0 | $388 | $22,311 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $8,870 | $1,218 | $29,964 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $11,096 | $8,505 | $32,555 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $16,397 | $14,748 | $34,205 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 11, 2026 | $5,569 | $4,151 | $35,623 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $5,965 | $4,285 | $37,303 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $19,031 | $12,395 | $43,939 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $50,141 | $34,006 | $60,074 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $7,642 | $23,274 | $44,442 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
11 endorsers listed on Melissa McDonough’s own campaign site: 10 organizations, 1 newspaper.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 27,073 votes (52%) · 1 of 3 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 97 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $52.7K.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
The largest of the committees is listed. In all, 1 committee contribution was filed this cycle, totaling $500. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $124,711
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
98% of the money placed by state came from inside Texas: $51.5K of $52.7K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 94 contributions · 98% | $51,472 |
| 1 contribution · 1.9% | $1,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.5% | $238 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 3 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 19 contributions · 54% of ranked | $28,036 |
| Written instead of an employer · 37 contributions · 21% of ranked | $11,039 |
| 1 contribution · 6.7% of ranked | $3,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 6 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $2,238 |
| Written instead of an employer · 3 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $1,250 |
| 11 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $1,100 |
| 1 contribution · 1.9% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $750 |
A further $500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($20,650) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 19 contributions · 53% of ranked | $28,036 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 37 contributions · 21% of ranked | $11,039 |
| 1 contribution · 6.6% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 11 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $1,100 |
| 1 contribution · 1.9% of ranked | $1,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 2 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $1,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 1.9% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $750 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($20,650) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Total itemized disbursements $58,188
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 159 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 20% of all spending | $21,000 |
| 4 payments · 5% of all spending | $5,168 |
| 7 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $4,405 |
| 48 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $4,254 |
| 4 payments · 3% of all spending | $3,071 |
| 2 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $2,200 |
| 3 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $1,801 |
| 16 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $1,712 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.