Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › AZ-04 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, AZ-04
Has not served in Congress
6 priorities from z4az.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
The American dream has always been about a better tomorrow, about children doing better than their parents. But today, Americans are spending more to buy less.
Washington’s reckless spending has driven up costs and red tape is choking opportunity. It’s time to start America’s growth engine again. That means reining in wasteful spending, letting Americans keep more of their hard-earned money, and cutting needless regulations so small businesses can thrive.
We must bring manufacturing home, curb foreign investors pricing out families, and create conditions where the next generation can afford a home. A strong economy starts with freedom — freedom to work, build, and keep more of what you earn.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · z4az.com
Heading as listed on z4az.com ↗ (opens z4az.com at this heading)
As a small business owner of over 20 years, I know the importance of balancing a budget. Arizona families and businesses do it every day – why can’t Congress?
I support a Balanced Budget Amendment to the United States Constitution. And in Congress, I’ll fight to get our spending under control. For too long, both parties have spent without regard for whether we can afford it. This is a non-partisan issue – if we don’t deal with our spiraling federal debt, there will be major economic and national security implications.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · z4az.com
Heading as listed on z4az.com ↗ (opens z4az.com at this heading)
As the son of immigrants, I understand the value and promise of America. And protecting the American Dream also means protecting our borders.
It’s a simple principle that people should knock on your door before they come in. But under Joe Biden, we saw a complete and utter disrespect for the law and sovereignty of our nation.
Unlike Greg Stanton, I will support more resources for our border agents, as they have the tools and support to properly secure our border. As your representative in Congress, I would take my responsibility representing our border state seriously and prioritize the security and safety of our nation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · z4az.com
Heading as listed on z4az.com ↗ (opens z4az.com at this heading)
Every child deserves access to a world-class, high-quality education, no matter their income or background. Unfortunately, too many families are stuck in failing schools, and entrenched special interests have only made things worse for these kids and their parents.
That’s why I support educational freedom in education, and funding students — not systems.
In Congress, I would be a supporter of policies that empower parents and bring more dollars to the state to fund the best choices for Arizona families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · z4az.com
Heading as listed on z4az.com ↗ (opens z4az.com at this heading)
We’re spending over $300 billion a year on drug treatment and $200 billion on obesity care, and we deserve better outcomes.
As a physician, having practiced primary care in the trenches in our community for over 26 years, I know what works and what’s broken in our healthcare system. I will put the health and freedoms of Americans first, and I’ll stand up to the special interests that are focused only on the bottom line.
America is unhealthy, and we saw a boom in obesity, drug use, and mental health problems after the pandemic.I was one of the few prominent voices from within the primary care medical community across Arizona and America who spoke up against the weaponization of government and the medical establishment during the COVID pandemic. The pandemic was exploited for ‘disease trading’ and taking away the individual rights of every American and their family to make their own healthcare and business decisions. I’m so glad to see a renewed and positive focus on health under President Trump’s leadership, and I believe Americans deserve a continued focus on making America healthy again.
We need to stop subsidizing our ailments and start solving them.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · z4az.com
Heading as listed on z4az.com ↗ (opens z4az.com at this heading)
We must strengthen America’s standing on the world stage. That starts with a prepared military that has up-to-date equipment and a ready fighting force. As a Navy veteran, I understand how foundational this is to our national security.
I will dedicate my work in Congress to restore our military readiness to the levels commensurate with the national security and defense our citizens need and deserve. The current percent of GDP related to our defense forces is far below where we should be in order to maintain the level of strength necessary to continue to be feared across the planet.
Long term, just as our enemies are advancing the ideas of Marxism, socialism and Islamism across the planet against our ideas, it serves our interests, our security, our values and the human rights of others who share them for America to be present globally in the war of ideas for liberty and freedom. Where those ideas are absent, that vacuum is filled by malign actors like China, Iran, or Qatar to name a few.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · z4az.com
Heading as listed on z4az.com ↗ (opens z4az.com at this heading)
FEC filings, Jul 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00914598
88¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 6 reports ($654.7K of $744.3K). Cash on hand went from $175.2K on Sep 30, 2025 to $89.6K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $195,239 | $20,019 | $175,220 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $171,957 | $57,537 | $289,641 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $82,913 | $73,299 | $299,255 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 1, 2026 | $114,531 | $72,135 | $341,651 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $168,271 | $393,801 | $116,121 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $11,392 | $37,958 | $89,556 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
8 endorsers listed on Zuhdi Jasser’s own campaign site: 3 officials, 1 organization, 4 people.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Former Senator
“I am proud to endorse Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, who I have known for over 20 years…After a lifetime of proven service in our communities he is now running to take on and take out Congressman Greg Stanton…If you believe in supporting our best and brightest our nation has to offer, Zuhdi not only deserves your support, I believe he has earned it.”
Former Phoenix city councilman
“Dr. Jasser has been a staple in this community for over 25 years who had the courage to stand up to the medical establishment against their slide into coercive pandemic mandates as he kept his clinic open during COVID-19…Dr. Jasser is the unwavering conservative we need to defeat liberal Congressman Stanton.”
“As a fellow veteran and past Republican nominee for Congress, I’m proud to endorse Dr. Zuhdi Jasser for Arizona’s 4th Congressional District. Zuhdi’s service as a U.S. Navy veteran, his work as a physician, and his unwavering commitment to faith, family, and freedom make him exactly the kind of leader Arizonans need. I have every confidence he will hold Greg Stanton accountable, win next November, and deliver the strong, principled representation our district deserves.”
Author and Radio Host
“Never in my memory have we had a more qualified person running for congress.”
No count published yet · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 418 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $541K.
The 4 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 6 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $15K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $744,304
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
85% of the money placed by state came from inside Arizona: $462K of $541K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 329 contributions · 85% | $461,983 |
| 15 contributions · 4.6% | $24,682 |
| 14 contributions · 2.3% | $12,371 |
| 11 contributions · 2.1% | $11,341 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% | $6,708 |
| 8 contributions · 0.6% | $3,364 |
| 6 contributions · 0.5% | $2,710 |
| 2 contributions · 0.5% | $2,561 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 24 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 191 contributions · 41% of ranked | $199,403 |
| Written instead of an employer · 45 contributions · 17% of ranked | $85,604 |
| 3 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $9,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $50,700 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($52,735) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $12,254 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $253,259
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 151 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $2,190 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 11 payments · 8.7% of all spending | $57,201 |
| 4 payments · 6.7% of all spending | $43,627 |
| 8 payments · 6.4% of all spending | $41,657 |
| 11 payments · 5% of all spending | $33,000 |
| 3 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $16,000 |
| 46 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $11,862 |
| 3 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $11,709 |
| 3 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $7,938 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 209 contributions · 42% of ranked | $225,353 |
| 46 contributions · 8.1% of ranked | $43,244 |
| 7 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $22,602 |
| 7 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $22,250 |
| 6 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $18,541 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 5 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $18,500 |
| 9 contributions · 3% of ranked | $16,051 |
| 11 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $13,250 |
A further $6,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($52,735) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.