Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-17 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, CA-17
Has not served in Congress
38 priorities from tandonforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
My Affordability Agenda: lower costs, expand opportunity, protect innovation, and help every family build a secure future in California and across America. (Click for details.)
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tandonforcongress.com
Heading as listed on tandonforcongress.com ↗ (opens tandonforcongress.com at this heading)
Policy: Reduce everyday household expenses on essentials like groceries, utilities, transportation, insurance, and basic services.
Solution: Enact targeted middle-class relief, strengthen market competition, crack down on hidden junk fees, and support federal actions that lower core living costs without expanding bureaucracy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tandonforcongress.com
Heading as listed on tandonforcongress.com ↗ (opens tandonforcongress.com at this heading)
Policy: Increase housing affordability for renters, first-time buyers, and workforce families in high-cost regions like California.
Solution: Expand federal incentives for new housing supply, reward faster local permitting, support first-time homebuyer savings tools, and grow workforce housing near jobs and transit.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tandonforcongress.com
Heading as listed on tandonforcongress.com ↗ (opens tandonforcongress.com at this heading)
Policy: Make college and career pathways more affordable and aligned with real job outcomes — and increase teacher pay in California to attract great talent.
Solution: Support tuition-pressure reforms, expand career and technical education, strengthen community-college transfer pipelines, and tie training programs to high-growth sectors.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tandonforcongress.com
Heading as listed on tandonforcongress.com ↗ (opens tandonforcongress.com at this heading)
Policy: Reduce the medical cost burden on families and seniors.
Solution: Lower out-of-pocket costs, increase healthcare price transparency, reduce prescription drug costs, and expand access to preventive and primary care.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tandonforcongress.com
Heading as listed on tandonforcongress.com ↗ (opens tandonforcongress.com at this heading)
Policy: Prevent excessive tax and fee burdens that weaken family budgets and discourage innovation.
Solution: Oppose layered tax increases and commuter-punishing fee schemes, simplify compliance, and promote tax fairness for workers, retirees, and small businesses.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tandonforcongress.com
Heading as listed on tandonforcongress.com ↗ (opens tandonforcongress.com at this heading)
Policy: Deliver reliable, affordable energy and transportation to reduce monthly household costs.
Solution: Advance an all-of-the-above energy strategy, modernize the grid, improve fuel and power reliability, and invest in transportation efficiency to lower commute expenses.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tandonforcongress.com
Heading as listed on tandonforcongress.com ↗ (opens tandonforcongress.com at this heading)
Policy: Reduce care-related financial pressure on working families and caregivers.
Solution: Expand affordable childcare access, strengthen elder-care support systems, and provide flexible federal support that helps families stay in the workforce.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tandonforcongress.com
Heading as listed on tandonforcongress.com ↗ (opens tandonforcongress.com at this heading)
Policy: Improve affordability through higher wages, stronger local employment, and small-business growth.
Solution: Cut unnecessary regulatory barriers, support domestic investment, expand pro-growth small-business policies, and encourage employee ownership models that build wealth.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tandonforcongress.com
Heading as listed on tandonforcongress.com ↗ (opens tandonforcongress.com at this heading)
Policy: Ensure U.S. leadership in AI, biotech, robotics, quantum, and advanced manufacturing.
Solution: Pass startup-friendly federal policy, strengthen IP protections, support R&D commercialization, and invest in innovation infrastructure that keeps talent and capital in America.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tandonforcongress.com
Heading as listed on tandonforcongress.com ↗ (opens tandonforcongress.com at this heading)
Policy: Promote long-term affordability through responsible federal budgeting and pro-growth economics.
Solution: Reduce wasteful spending, prioritize high-impact investments, support growth-oriented fiscal reforms, and implement accountability measures that lower inflationary pressure over time.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tandonforcongress.com
Heading as listed on tandonforcongress.com ↗ (opens tandonforcongress.com at this heading)
Policy: Oppose a California billionaire wealth tax that risks driving investment, founders, and job creators out of the state.
Solution: Focus on spending discipline instead of new wealth taxes—cut waste, streamline agencies, eliminate duplicative programs, and make state government lean and accountable. Promote growth policies that keep capital, innovation, and high-paying jobs in California.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tandonforcongress.com
Heading as listed on tandonforcongress.com ↗ (opens tandonforcongress.com at this heading)
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00721878
91¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($51.8K of $57K). Cash on hand went from $0 on Mar 31, 2025 to $5.2K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $100 | $0 | $100 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $0 | $45 | $55 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $9,158 | $7,075 | $2,139 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $24,475 | $19,525 | $7,088 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $3,920 | $10,118 | $891 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $14,807 | $14,996 | $702 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $4,551 | $26 | $5,227 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
8 endorsers listed on Ritesh Tandon’s own campaign site: 2 parties, 5 organizations, 1 person.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Santa Clara County Republican Party
President of the Executive Board, Northern California Vietnamese American Community
Not yet called · 100% reporting · Full results ↗
Lost · 145,014 votes (47%) · 2 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 64 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $52K.
Total reported receipts $57,011
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
75% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $39.2K of $52K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 57 contributions · 75% | $39,205 |
| 3 contributions · 14% | $7,500 |
| 1 contribution · 6.7% | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1.9% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1% | $500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% | $250 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 6 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 18 contributions · 30% of ranked | $14,753 |
| 2 contributions · 10% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 7.5% of ranked | $3,700 |
| 1 contribution · 7% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 7% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 2 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $3,250 |
| 1 contribution · 5% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $1,250 |
A further $2,300 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,731) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $200 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $50,767
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 47 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $14,500 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9 payments · 52% of all spending | $26,869 |
| 2 payments · 35% of all spending | $18,324 |
| 2 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $1,891 |
| 1 payment · 3.2% of all spending | $1,650 |
| 27 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $1,383 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $400 |
| 1 payment · 0.5% of all spending | $250 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 20 contributions · 32% of ranked | $16,253 |
| 10 contributions · 21% of ranked | $10,502 |
| 1 contribution · 7.2% of ranked | $3,700 |
| 1 contribution · 6.8% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 6.8% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 4.9% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 2 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $1,750 |
| 1 contribution · 2% of ranked | $1,000 |
A further $800 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,731) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.