FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00925784 · files quarterly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$309.9K raised, $101K spent, $208.9K cash on hand (through Sep 30, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
57% filed as other receipts · 29% from donors giving $200 or less · largest donor William Connell, $10K. See who funds it
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $309,850 reported receipts
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$177,37257%
A name search for “POLITICAL INTEGRITY” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Mackenzie BrayOne contribution on Dec 5, 2025 · ARCHITECT · SELF-EMPLOYED · PARADISE VLY, AZ$1,000
Ford JohnsonOne contribution on Feb 21, 2026 · NOT EMPLOYED · N/A · OAKLAND, CA$1,000
Daniel Lobo-Lewis2 contributions, latest Feb 26, 2026 · DALLAS, TX$814
Nicholas AbidOne contribution on Dec 5, 2025 · PROTOCOL SPECIALIST · 21ST THEATER SUSTAINMENT COMMA · APO, AE$500
Kimberly BocianOne contribution on Jun 5, 2026 · RETIRED · N/A · MILTON, GA$500
The 13 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$88,49029%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$33,97311%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$10,0003.2%
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$16<0.1%
Total reported receipts $309,850
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $45,493 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $471
$471+
$1.9K+
$4.2K+
$7.5K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Illinois11 contributions · 26%
$11,770
Montana2 contributions · 23%
$10,250
California19 contributions · 17%
$7,860
New York9 contributions · 5.3%
$2,395
Texas10 contributions · 5.2%
$2,354
Massachusetts8 contributions · 4.3%
$1,950
Arizona3 contributions · 3.3%
$1,500
Indiana6 contributions · 1.9%
$875
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Lake Forest College2 contributions · 37% of ranked
$10,000
Families Advocating For Chemic1 contribution · 18% of ranked
$5,000
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 7 contributions · 9.2% of ranked
$2,510
American Physical Society7 contributions · 7.7% of ranked
$2,100
Church Of Ascension9 contributions · 6.5% of ranked
$1,770
Farsight7 contributions · 6.4% of ranked
$1,750
21ST Theater Sustainment Comma1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked
$500
24X7 Systems1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked
$500
A further $23,261 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($88,490) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
What the payments were for $18,639 itemized
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$11,38761%
Filed as
SALARY$11,157
PAYROLL SERVICES$230
Paid to
Lobo-Lewis, Daniel$5,753
Agosta, Nicolo$5,405
Gusto$230
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$3,59119%
Filed as
PAYROLL TAXES$3,547
BANK FEE$44
Paid to
Gusto$3,547
Amalgamated Bank$44
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$2,00011%
Filed as
IT CONUSLTING$2,000
Paid to
Oberoi Consulting LLC$2,000
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$9935.3%
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$4122.2%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES$412
Paid to
Stripe$412
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$2551.4%
Filed as
CAMPAIGN FINANCE CONSULTING$255
Paid to
Cohen, Alexander$255
Total itemized disbursements $18,639
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 29 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
7 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $11,805 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Gusto12 payments · 15% of all spending
$15,328
Oberoi Consulting LLC1 payment · 2% of all spending
$2,000
Sandler Reiff Lamb Rosenstein & Birkenstock, P.C.1 payment · 0.6% of all spending
$600
Stripe7 payments · 0.4% of all spending
$412
Lobo-Lewis, Daniel1 payment · 0.3% of all spending
$255
Amalgamated Bank2 payments · <0.1% of all spending
$44
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Spending over time
$101K spent from Jul 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $45.3K, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
$101K
Jul 2025Sep 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$45,336
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$33,243
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$16,405
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$5,986
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 55 contributions · 43% of ranked
$21,407
Board Of Trustees2 contributions · 20% of ranked
$10,000
President/co-founder1 contribution · 10% of ranked
$5,000
Senior Program Manager7 contributions · 4.3% of ranked
$2,100
Musician9 contributions · 3.6% of ranked
$1,770
Strategic Financial Consultant7 contributions · 3.6% of ranked
$1,750
Engineer7 contributions · 2.8% of ranked
$1,400
Architect1 contribution · 2% of ranked
$1,000
A further $1,254 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($88,490) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.