Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00897223 · files monthly
2 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Republicans have hijacked the federal judiciary, turning it into a weapon for right-wing extremism, corporate power, and minority rule.
At all levels of the federal judiciary, from District Courts all the way to the Supreme Court, Republican-appointed judges have dismantled voting rights, overturned protections for workers and women, and shielded corruption at the highest levels of government.
Through grassroots activism, strategic pressure, and mass mobilization, Stop Republican Judges is building the movement to take back our courts—because our future depends on it.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · stoprepublicanjudges.org
Heading as listed on stoprepublicanjudges.org ↗ (opens stoprepublicanjudges.org at this heading) · “We must take back our courts.” on stoprepublicanjudges.org ↗ (opens stoprepublicanjudges.org at this heading)
The courts have been packed with right-wing extremists.
We must restore balance by adding more judges at all levels.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · stoprepublicanjudges.org
Heading as listed on stoprepublicanjudges.org ↗ (opens stoprepublicanjudges.org at this heading)
Congress must investigate, censure, and impeach judges who violate ethical and legal standards.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · stoprepublicanjudges.org
Heading as listed on stoprepublicanjudges.org ↗ (opens stoprepublicanjudges.org at this heading)
No judge should wield unchecked power for life.
We support term limits for all federal judges, including Supreme Court justices.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · stoprepublicanjudges.org
Heading as listed on stoprepublicanjudges.org ↗ (opens stoprepublicanjudges.org at this heading)
We must fight back against decisions that roll back civil rights, weaken democracy, and protect corporate power.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · stoprepublicanjudges.org
Heading as listed on stoprepublicanjudges.org ↗ (opens stoprepublicanjudges.org at this heading)
Federal judges and Supreme Court justices must follow strict ethics rules—no more secret gifts, conflicts of interest, or financial corruption.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · stoprepublicanjudges.org
Heading as listed on stoprepublicanjudges.org ↗ (opens stoprepublicanjudges.org at this heading)
Heading as listed on stoprepublicanjudges.org ↗ (opens stoprepublicanjudges.org at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $35K |
$35K across 1 recipient committee, or 2.8% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
The 12 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $1,304,382
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,421 contributions · 22% | $45,018 |
| 771 contributions · 6.7% | $13,882 |
Total reported disbursements $1,248,112
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$1.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $426.6K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Stop Republican Judges is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Stop Republican Judges is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| $13,686 |
| 785 contributions · 6.4% | $13,192 |
| 482 contributions · 4.5% | $9,308 |
| 372 contributions · 3.8% | $7,790 |
| 650 contributions · 3.4% | $7,000 |
| 258 contributions · 3.3% | $6,737 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 11,164 contributions · 87% of ranked | $178,514 |
| Written instead of an employer · 402 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $9,249 |
| 11 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $1,100 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 12 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $840 |
| 38 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $743 |
| 13 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $730 |
| 25 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $729 |
A further $1,898 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($505,195) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 10,798 contributions · 84% of ranked | $170,645 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 319 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $6,958 |
| 100 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $2,147 |
| 33 contributions · 1% of ranked | $1,945 |
| 84 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $1,895 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $912 |
| 9 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $860 |
A further $1,848 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($505,195) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $572,125
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 127 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 35 payments · 28% of all spending | $346,118 |
| 1 payment · 6.4% of all spending | $80,000 |
| 5 payments · 5.4% of all spending | $66,960 |
| 2 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $35,000 |
| 78 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $23,434 |
| 6 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $20,613 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.