Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (nonqualified)Evanston, IllinoisActive
Connected organization: Progressive Turnout Project
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00894295 · files quarterly
“Dem Trunout 2026 is dedicated to turbocharging the vote in the 2026 elections so Democrats have the best chance to win.”
DEM Turnout 2026, on its own site, demturnout.io
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
6 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Turbocharging the vote so Democrats have the best chance to win in 2026.
As the GOTV arm of Progressive Turnout Project, we’re committed to updating the Democratic playbook and testing new ways to reach more 2026 voters.
We utilize innovative voter contact approaches that allow us to connect with inconsistent Democratic voters at their doors, through personal networks, via handwritten postcards, and other data-driven and cost-effective strategies.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · demturnout.io
Heading as listed on demturnout.io ↗ (opens demturnout.io at this heading)
Dem Turnout 2026 is focused on building Democratic power at every level of government, from flipping Congress to protecting and expanding our gains in state capitals.
We’re investing in the races that will create lasting change for working families nationwide.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · demturnout.io
Heading as listed on demturnout.io ↗ (opens demturnout.io at this heading)
We need to flip just 3 seats to end Republican obstruction and pass legislation that actually helps working families.
A Democratic House majority means advancing policies like affordable healthcare, climate action, reproductive freedom, and economic opportunity while blocking extremist Republican attacks on democracy and civil rights.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · demturnout.io
Heading as listed on demturnout.io ↗ (opens demturnout.io at this heading)
Democrats need to flip 4 Senate seats to regain control and ensure we can advance President Biden’s agenda and confirm progressive judges.
With key pickup opportunities across the map, we’re positioned to build a Senate majority that will fight for reproductive rights, climate action, and economic opportunity for all Americans.
Democratic Senate control means blocking extremist nominees and passing legislation that helps working families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · demturnout.io
Heading as listed on demturnout.io ↗ (opens demturnout.io at this heading)
We’re defending critical Democratic governors in Arizona, Michigan, and Wisconsin while targeting flippable seats in Georgia, Nevada, Iowa, New Hampshire, and Ohio.
These races will determine who controls redistricting, protects voting rights, and safeguards reproductive freedom in key swing states.
With 36 gubernatorial races on the ballot, we have unprecedented opportunities to expand Democratic power where it matters most for everyday Americans.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · demturnout.io
Heading as listed on demturnout.io ↗ (opens demturnout.io at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to STOP THESE OPPRESSIVE PEOPLE: TYRANTS RACISTS UNQUALIFIEDS MISOGYNISTS PROPAGANDISTS (STOP TRUMP) · 1 payment | $200K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to BLUE TO THE FUTURE 2024 · 1 payment | $553 |
$200.6K from 2 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to STOP THESE OPPRESSIVE PEOPLE: TYRANTS RACISTS UNQUALIFIEDS MISOGYNISTS PROPAGANDISTS (STOP TRUMP) · 5 payments | $1.9M |
$1.9M across 1 recipient committee, or 40% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 58,451 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.5M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $4,832,159
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 11,421 contributions · 22% | $319,492 |
| 4,882 contributions · 7.5% |
Total reported disbursements $4,713,263
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$4.7M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $2.5M, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
DEM Turnout 2026 is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Its FEC record names Progressive Turnout Project as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
DEM Turnout 2026 is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| $109,388 |
| 3,486 contributions · 6.5% | $94,460 |
| 3,064 contributions · 5.4% | $79,242 |
| 2,556 contributions · 4.4% | $63,819 |
| 1,968 contributions · 3.9% | $57,194 |
| 1,982 contributions · 3.5% | $51,066 |
| 2,192 contributions · 2.9% | $42,987 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 45,677 contributions · 86% of ranked | $1,075,270 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,822 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $49,019 |
| Written instead of an employer · 324 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $11,773 |
| 49 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $5,213 |
| 1 contribution · 0.4% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.4% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 127 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $3,357 |
A further $172,386 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,465,004) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 46,151 contributions · 84% of ranked | $1,083,102 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 955 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $28,171 |
| 170 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $10,626 |
| 63 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $5,738 |
| 1 contribution · 0.4% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 291 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $4,573 |
| 38 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $4,309 |
| 150 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $3,945 |
A further $148,478 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,465,004) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $4,392,717
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 282 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
15 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $153,777 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 49 payments · 41% of all spending | $1,928,093 |
| 5 payments · 40% of all spending | $1,900,000 |
| 183 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $184,498 |
| 18 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $161,298 |
| 7 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $82,633 |
| 2 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $54,200 |
| 1 payment · 0.7% of all spending | $33,475 |
| 5 payments · 0.6% of all spending | $28,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.