Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00879908 · files monthly
“Diabetic Wound Awareness PAC advocates for access to skin substitutes, proven therapies that help heal chronic wounds and restore quality of life. By promoting these treatments at fair prices, we aim to reduce amputations, improve outcomes for patients, and save billions in healthcare costs for patients, providers, and taxpayers.”
Diabetic Wound Awareness PAC, on its own site, dwapac.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
4 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Guided by the principle of Saving Dollars, Saving Lives, we represent patients and their families, medical providers, researchers, scientists, and industry to promote equity, pricing fairness, and expanded access to proven wound-healing products.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dwapac.com
Heading as listed on dwapac.com ↗ (opens dwapac.com at this heading)
THE REALITY ↗ (opens dwapac.com/access at this heading)
In a matter of weeks, US wound care availability has plummeted by more than 90% directly caused by CMS’s Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) rule and policy changes effectively eliminating Medicare coverage for nearly all wound care products.
Providers report performing more amputations in the first five weeks of 2026 than in all of 2025; and Congressional testimony this week confirmed “patients will not receive” products.
Clinic closures, service cutbacks and unavailability of clinically proven wound care treatments are leaving several millions patients unable to access state-of-the-art wound care.
Approximately 3.1 million Medicare beneficiaries are impacted nationwide.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dwapac.com/access
Heading as listed on dwapac.com ↗ (opens dwapac.com at this heading)
Innovative skin substitutes, also called Cellular and Acellular Matrix Products (CAMPs), are transforming wound care.
Backed by clinical evidence, these therapies close wounds faster, prevent complications, and save lives.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dwapac.com
CMS must expedite a coverage policy that ensures adequate reimbursement and market access for safe, clinically effective skin substitute products.
Contributions from federal contractors and foreign nationals are prohibited.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dwapac.com/access
What sets CAMPs apart is how they work.
For patients, this difference is life-changing.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dwapac.com/the-remedy
Heading as listed on dwapac.com ↗ (opens dwapac.com at this heading)
Chronic wounds rank among the most expensive health conditions treated in the US.
By reducing hospital stays, readmissions, and complications, skin substitutes generate savings for patients, providers, and the entire healthcare system.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dwapac.com
Chronic wounds represent a major financial strain on the U.S. healthcare system.
These costs often reflect ongoing management rather than healing.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dwapac.com/the-savings
Heading as listed on dwapac.com ↗ (opens dwapac.com at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Total reported receipts $1,350,000
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total reported disbursements $1,246,175
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $1,245,497
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 38 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 50% of all spending | $619,810 |
| 6 payments · 49% of all spending | $612,000 |
| 6 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $8,268 |
| 19 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $3,636 |
| 2 payments · 0.1% of all spending | $1,733 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $50 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
$1.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $291.2K, October 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Diabetic Wound Awareness PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Diabetic Wound Awareness PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.