Where it spendsWhich races and candidates is its money for or against?
For or against 1 candidate$8,319
In regular reports
$8.3K
1 candidate, through Dec 31, 2025
Newer notices
$0
No notices
Rafael Edward Ted Cruz▼ Against · Senate, TX7 records, latest Jan 29, 2025 · FEC filing$8.3K
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Against candidates $8,319
Other or unresolved 100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $1,285,467 reported receipts
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$1,104,19786%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$180,08214%
Largest donors
B. Bond Starker12 contributions, latest Nov 29, 2025 · FORESTER · STARKER FORESTS · CORVALLIS, OR$3,250
Gary Wilson2 contributions, latest Feb 16, 2025 · CHICO, CA$3,000
Elizabeth Smith168 contributions, latest Nov 23, 2025 · RETIRED · ELIZABETH SMITH · PLANO, TX$2,855
George KralovecOne contribution on Feb 11, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · ANNANDALE, VA$2,500
Barbara Defelice2 contributions, latest Apr 16, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · THETFORD CENTER, VT$2,000
Elizabeth Driehaus8 contributions, latest Nov 25, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · BROOKLINE, MA$2,000
Carol Herndon2 contributions, latest Feb 12, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · BETHESDA, MD$2,000
Keenan Kelsey2 contributions, latest May 22, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · LARKSPUR, CA
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $1,307,867 reported
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$1,284,94098%
A name search for “NRRC” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
$2,000
Albert Kaneb7 contributions, latest Sep 18, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · WESTON, MA$1,750
Janet Goodhue93 contributions, latest Aug 20, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · NONE · TUCSON, AZ$1,635
Al Kamen12 contributions, latest Aug 25, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · NEW YORK, NY$1,250
Donald Miller9 contributions, latest Sep 22, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · OAK RIDGE, TN$1,100
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,035 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $154.1K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$1,189<0.1%
Total reported receipts $1,285,467
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Dec 31, 2025.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $154,070 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $1.1K
$1.1K+
$4.5K+
$10.2K+
$18.1K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California336 contributions · 18%
$28,293
Massachusetts99 contributions · 7.7%
$11,794
New York110 contributions · 6.5%
$9,972
Oregon53 contributions · 5%
$7,740
Pennsylvania83 contributions · 4.9%
$7,571
Texas215 contributions · 4.9%
$7,486
Florida78 contributions · 4.7%
$7,190
Colorado110 contributions · 4.6%
$7,062
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an employer · 1,283 contributions · 69% of ranked
$99,786
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 141 contributions · 6.5% of ranked
$9,404
Starker Forests12 contributions · 2.3% of ranked
$3,250
Elizabeth Smith161 contributions · 1.9% of ranked
$2,708
Insaco INC2 contributions · 0.7% of ranked
$1,050
Grandview Health1 contribution · 0.7% of ranked
$1,000
Trident Group INC1 contribution · 0.7% of ranked
$1,000
RetiredWritten instead of an employer · 16 contributions · 0.6% of ranked
$900
A further $10,317 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,104,197) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Quickbooks13 payments · latest Dec 8, 2025 · SOFTWARE$1,393
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$14,6081.1%
Independent expendituresSpending to support or oppose a candidate, made without coordinating with them.$8,3190.6%
Spent for or against
Rafael Edward Ted CruzOppose · 7 records · latest Jan 29, 2025$8,319
Total reported disbursements $1,307,867
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Dec 31, 2025.
What the payments were for $1,284,785 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $8,319 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$739,30658%
Filed as
SMS MESSAGING$706,832
EMAIL SERVICES$23,770
SOFTWARE$8,704
Paid to
Paction Data$449,198
Paction Data, Inc.$216,382
Scale to Win$41,252
Message Digital LLC$23,770
NGP VAN$7,311
Quickbooks$1,393
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$294,56623%
Filed as
GENERAL POLITICAL CONSULTING$287,443
COMPLIANCE CONSULTING$4,844
CONSULTING/LEGAL SERVICES$2,041
LEGAL CONSULTING$238
Paid to
NP Consulting$167,695
NP Consulting, Inc$119,748
Complyblue LLC$4,844
Sandler Reiff$2,279
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$142,53011%
Filed as
DIGITAL ADS & CONSULTING$105,030
SOCIAL MEDIA CONSULTING$37,500
Paid to
NP Consulting, Inc$105,030
E23 Digital LLC$37,500
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$57,8324.5%
Filed as
DIGITAL SERVICES$57,832
Paid to
Message Digital LLC$57,832
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$41,1163.2%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION PROCESSING$41,116
Paid to
ActBlue$41,116
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$9,2510.7%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEE$9,251
Paid to
ActBlue$9,251
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$184<0.1%
Filed as
BANKING FEE$184
Paid to
Eagle Bank$184
Total itemized disbursements $1,284,785
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Dec 31, 2025.
All 130 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
6 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $366,473 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
American Express6 payments · 28% of all spending
$366,473
NP Consulting, Inc5 payments · 17% of all spending
$224,778
Paction Data, Inc.2 payments · 14% of all spending
$188,607
NP Consulting4 payments · 13% of all spending
$167,695
Paction Data1 payment · 12% of all spending
$151,752
Message Digital LLC12 payments · 6.2% of all spending
$81,602
ActBlue60 payments · 3.9% of all spending
$50,367
E23 Digital LLC12 payments · 2.9% of all spending
$37,500
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Spending over time
$1.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Dec 2025. Most in one report: $759.8K, Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
$1.3M
Jan 2025Dec 2025
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$548,029
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$759,838
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 1,417 contributions · 69% of ranked
$102,239
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 194 contributions · 3% of ranked
$4,500
Forester12 contributions · 2.2% of ranked
$3,250
Attorney24 contributions · 1.8% of ranked
$2,720
Physician15 contributions · 1.5% of ranked
$2,200
Consultant71 contributions · 1.1% of ranked
$1,657
RN8 contributions · 1% of ranked
$1,550
Engineer6 contributions · 0.9% of ranked
$1,325
A further $6,022 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,104,197) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.