Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00849000 · files quarterly
“Accountability Action PAC is fighting to safeguard the core values of the Republican Party—honesty, integrity, and a deep respect for the Constitution. We believe in the power of every voter to shape the future of our nation, and we’re dedicated to turning out conservative voices in the most decisive House and Senate races.
In a time of division and gridlock, we stand firm in our commitment to limited government, personal responsibility, and strong national defense. Through targeted Get Out The Vote (GOTV) efforts, we engage citizens across swing states, focusing on empowering voters to elect leaders who embody the best of Republican ideals.”
Accountability Action, on its own site, accountability.vote
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 188 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $49.9K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $1,515,244
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 15 contributions · 12% | $5,885 |
| 10 contributions · 7.1% | $3,550 |
| 16 contributions · 6.9% | $3,426 |
| 15 contributions · 6.6% | $3,311 |
Total reported disbursements $1,494,339
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $1,282,393
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 214 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 38 payments · 64% of all spending | $956,072 |
| 21 payments · 11% of all spending | $166,074 |
| 42 payments · 8.2% of all spending | $122,674 |
| 2 payments · 2% of all spending | $30,550 |
| 110 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $4,548 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $2,475 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
$1.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $650.2K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, Court Accountability Action pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Each firm reports what this client paid it.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “COURT ACCOUNTABILITY ACTION (GLOBAL IMPACT SOCIAL WELFARE FUND)”, found by searching “ACCOUNTABILITY ACTION”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 26, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Accountability Action is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Super PAC (independent expenditure-only). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Accountability Action is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| 10 contributions · 6.3% | $3,150 |
| 16 contributions · 5.4% | $2,715 |
| 10 contributions · 5.2% | $2,595 |
| 8 contributions · 4.1% | $2,045 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 94 contributions · 94% of ranked | $25,291 |
| 2 contributions · 2% of ranked | $535 |
| Written instead of an employer · 2 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $250 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $250 |
A further $23,085 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,449,492) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 94 contributions · 92% of ranked | $25,291 |
| 2 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $800 |
| 2 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $535 |
| 2 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $250 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $250 |
A further $22,285 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,449,492) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.