Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Forward Party - Restricted
The Forward Party (shortened Forward or FWD) is a centrist political party in the United States. The party was founded by former Democratic 2020 presidential and 2021 New York City mayoral candidate Andrew Yang and former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman. It describes its goals as the reduction of partisan polarization and the implementing of electoral reforms. The party looked to achieve ballot access in all 50 states by 2025 and looks to achieve federal recognition by 2028. Forward was officially formed as a political action committee (PAC) on October 5, 2021. The PAC intended to seek recognition from the Federal Election Commission as a political party to achieve its stated goal of providing an alternative to the two major U.S. political parties. It also stated that, for the time being, candidates affiliated with the organization will remain members of the two major American political parties and third parties, as well as independent candidates. On July 27, 2022, the Forward Party announced that it had merged with the Serve America Movement and the Renew America Movement to further its effort to form a new third party named Forward. Ideologically, Forward is populist and reformist, and a representative of centrism in the United States. It considers itself to be the center within the American political spectrum, although the party has also been described as big tent or syncretic due to its unwillingness on holding any firm stances or positions, and its rejection of the left–right political spectrum. The party's American-style populism, particularly in its early platform, focused toward independent voters and those dissatisfied with the American two-party system, and advocated a universal basic income within humanistic capitalism. It continues to support electoral and democratic reform (favoring in particular: nonpartisan primaries), independent redistricting commissions, and ranked-choice voting. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00789966 · files quarterly
“We believe everyday Americans should be able to decide what’s best for them and their communities.
That’s why we’re building a party that puts the power back in the hands of the American voter by:”
Forward Party, on its own site, forwardparty.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
8 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Paying lip-service to a set of values is easy.
Forward Party candidates not only espouse the Forward Party’s values but embody them in the way they live their lives, run for office, and govern once elected.
Below are statements reflecting your pledge to uphold Forward values and act in a way that demonstrates them.
DEMOCRACY ONLY WORKS WHEN PEOPLE RESPECT THE ESTABLISHED RULES AND THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM IS SET UP TO ELEVATE THE VOICE OF THE VOTER
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · forwardparty.com/pledge
Heading as listed on forwardparty.com/pledge ↗ (opens forwardparty.com/pledge at this heading)
I pledge to ground all of my work in the Constitution and rule of law, accept the results of elections barring contrary evidence verified in a court of law or by a Constitutional officer responsible for election oversight, and ensure all people are equally subject to and protected by the law.
This means respecting the confines of my office, partnering with other offices appropriately, following judicial decisions and answering valid subpoenas, supporting due process, and amending laws and constitutions only via defined, accepted mechanisms.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · forwardparty.com/pledge
Heading as listed on forwardparty.com/pledge ↗ (opens forwardparty.com/pledge at this heading)
I pledge to support innovations that strengthen democracy and elevate the voice and will of the voters and make elections secure and easy to vote in for all eligible voters, all while striving to represent all of my constituents.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · forwardparty.com/pledge
Heading as listed on forwardparty.com/pledge ↗ (opens forwardparty.com/pledge at this heading)
Supporting policies such as nonpartisan and open primaries, ranked choice voting, an end to gerrymandering through solutions such as independent redistricting commissions, and term limits.
Lowering barriers for new political parties and independent candidates.
Supporting independent (not bipartisan) election enforcement.
⚠️We expect candidates to do their best to adhere to this pledge and to act in a way that demonstrates our shared values.
If you have other ways of demonstrating these values, they can be just as valid as the ones listed, and we’d love to hear about them.
Holding regular constituent engagement sessions.
Establishing and listening to citizen advisory boards.
Providing an online explanation for all votes.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · forwardparty.com/pledge
Heading as listed on forwardparty.com/pledge ↗ (opens forwardparty.com/pledge at this heading)
I pledge to work for community-oriented, consensus-driven solutions based on communication with my constituents and in concert with any other elected official of any affiliation who is willing to engage on that issue in good faith.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · forwardparty.com/pledge
Heading as listed on forwardparty.com/pledge ↗ (opens forwardparty.com/pledge at this heading)
I pledge to caucus with a cross-partisan Forward caucus (legislative candidates only) — or to help form one if it doesn’t yet exist.
This ensures that Forward lawmakers won’t simply default to partisan positions, but will focus on building coalitions and finding common ground.
It’s a pledge to put people over parties, resist pressure to toe any party line, and work across divides to deliver real solutions.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · forwardparty.com/pledge
Heading as listed on forwardparty.com/pledge ↗ (opens forwardparty.com/pledge at this heading)
I pledge to approach others with respect for the dignity that lives in each of us.
My policies and campaign will seek to elevate and empower people to seek their unique version of the American Dream.
This means running a positive, issues-based campaign with a positive vision for my community, and never engaging in personal attacks or threats, or dehumanizing individuals or groups.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · forwardparty.com/pledge
Heading as listed on forwardparty.com/pledge ↗ (opens forwardparty.com/pledge at this heading)
I believe that, as a public servant, I have a duty to act in a way that is beyond reproach.
I pledge to conduct myself in a manner consistent with the highest ethical standards.
Not trading individual stocks for industries over which you have regulatory power while in office.
Stepping down if convicted of a felony.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · forwardparty.com/pledge
Heading as listed on forwardparty.com/pledge ↗ (opens forwardparty.com/pledge at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent | 4 | $17,500 | $0 | $17,500 | 70% |
| Other or unresolved | 1 | $5,000 | $0 | $5,000 | 20% |
| Democratic | 1 | $2,500 | $0 | $2,500 | 10% |
| Shown support | 6 | $25,000 | $0 | $25,000 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 1 | $2.5K · 10% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 5 | $22.5K · 90% |
| All recipients | 6 | $25K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 3 | $12.5K |
| Iowa | 2 | $10K |
| Arizona | 1 | $2.5K |
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $64.6K from 10 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $3,246,933
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 136 contributions · 23% | $594,209 |
| 247 contributions · 15% | $399,184 |
| 35 contributions · 15% | $382,746 |
| 49 contributions · 8.9% |
Total reported disbursements $3,209,275
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$3.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.1M, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
The Forward Party (shortened Forward or FWD) is a centrist political party in the United States. The party was founded by former Democratic 2020 presidential and 2021 New York City mayoral candidate Andrew Yang and former New Jersey Governor Christine Todd Whitman. It describes its goals as the reduction of partisan polarization and the implementing of electoral reforms. The party looked to achieve ballot access in all 50 states by 2025 and looks to achieve federal recognition by 2028. Forward was officially formed as a political action committee (PAC) on October 5, 2021. The PAC intended to seek recognition from the Federal Election Commission as a political party to achieve its stated goal of providing an alternative to the two major U.S. political parties. It also stated that, for the time being, candidates affiliated with the organization will remain members of the two major American political parties and third parties, as well as independent candidates. On July 27, 2022, the Forward Party announced that it had merged with the Serve America Movement and the Renew America Movement to further its effort to form a new third party named Forward. Ideologically, Forward is populist and reformist, and a representative of centrism in the United States. It considers itself to be the center within the American political spectrum, although the party has also been described as big tent or syncretic due to its unwillingness on holding any firm stances or positions, and its rejection of the left–right political spectrum. The party's American-style populism, particularly in its early platform, focused toward independent voters and those dissatisfied with the American two-party system, and advocated a universal basic income within humanistic capitalism. It continues to support electoral and democratic reform (favoring in particular: nonpartisan primaries), independent redistricting commissions, and ranked-choice voting. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Forward Party is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 17 payments | $137.4K |
$137.4K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 4 payments | $21.6K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to AMERICAN BATTLEGROUND FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
$46.6K across 10 recipient committees, or 1.5% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 7 are shown. A further $2.6K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $228,259 |
| 57 contributions · 8.4% | $217,672 |
| 44 contributions · 8% | $206,834 |
| 49 contributions · 4.4% | $112,632 |
| 76 contributions · 4.2% | $108,425 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 196 contributions · 16% of ranked | $418,396 |
| Written instead of an employer · 37 contributions · 8.9% of ranked | $227,846 |
| 2 contributions · 7.8% of ranked | $200,000 |
| 10 contributions · 7% of ranked | $180,000 |
| 17 contributions · 6.9% of ranked | $176,460 |
| 4 contributions · 5.6% of ranked | $145,000 |
| 12 contributions · 5.6% of ranked | $143,000 |
| 3 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $132,500 |
A further $9,024 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($194,968) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 contributions · 11% of ranked | $295,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 29 contributions · 8.8% of ranked | $227,446 |
| 3 contributions · 7.9% of ranked | $202,000 |
| 15 contributions · 7.2% of ranked | $186,086 |
| 6 contributions · 7.1% of ranked | $182,750 |
| 10 contributions · 7% of ranked | $180,000 |
| 15 contributions · 6.9% of ranked | $176,900 |
| 12 contributions · 5.6% of ranked | $143,000 |
A further $8,724 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($194,968) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $216,031
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,191 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
19 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $89,960 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 19 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $91,299 |
| 4 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $21,608 |
| 9 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $20,978 |
| 382 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $10,323 |
| 5 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $8,800 |
| 10 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $8,163 |
| 2 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $8,069 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $5,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.