FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00764290 · files monthly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$167.8K raised, $144.5K spent, $64.5K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
99% from donors giving over $200 · largest donor Michael Tierney, $10K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$142.5K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Claudia Tenney ($10K) · 42% of its support to Republicans, 34% to Democrats. See where it goes
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$62.5K to 24 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $62,500
Republican 42%
Democratic 34%
Other or unresolved 24%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Republican
11
$26,000
$0
$26,000
42%
Democratic
8
$21,500
$0
$21,500
34%
Other or unresolved
5
$15,000
$0
$15,000
24%
Shown support
24
$62,500
$0
$62,500
100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$142,500 in 53 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
9
$24K · 17%
Republican candidates
17
$39K · 27%
Other or unresolved candidates
6
$16K · 11%
Other party committees
4
$20K · 14%
Other PACs and committees
12
$43.5K · 31%
All recipients
48
$142.5K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
California
5
$12K
New York
1
$10K
New Mexico
2
$8.5K
Ohio
4
$7K
Connecticut
1
$5K
Missouri
1
$5K
Montana
1
$3.5K
Delaware
2
$3.5K
The largest 8 of 22 states.
Recipients 48
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Claudia Tenney2 receipts, latest Mar 18, 2026Claudia Tenney for Congress · H4NY22051$10K
John B. Larson3 receipts, latest Jul 22, 2026Larson for Congress · H8CT01046$5K
Jimmy Panetta1 receipt, latest Jun 19, 2026Jimmy Panetta for Congress · H6CA20152$5K
Martin Heinrich1 receipt, latest Jun 19, 2026Martin Heinrich for Senate · S2NM00088$5K
Steve Daines2 receipts, latest Sep 23, 2025Steve Daines for Montana · S2MT00096$3.5K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Committees this one funds
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
Committees this one funds
Name
Amount
Claudia Tenney for CongressHouse campaign committee · Connected to TENNEY VAN DUYNE VICTORY FUND · 2 payments
Where the money came from $167,762 reported receipts
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$166,45299%
Largest donors
Michael Tierney14 contributions, latest Mar 27, 2026 · VP, INVESTOR RELATIONS · BLOOM ENERGY · SAN JOSE, CA$9,993
Joseph Tavi46 contributions, latest Sep 25, 2026 · ENGINEER · BLOOM ENERGY · DANVILLE, CA$8,812
Christopher Mark Sedor39 contributions, latest Sep 25, 2026 · DIR., SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT · BLOOM ENERGY · SAN JOSE, CA$8,112
Michael Phillip Hearney39 contributions, latest Sep 25, 2026 · SR. DIR., PROGRAM MANAGEMENT · BLOOM ENERGY · SAN JOSE, CA$7,488
Evan Bloodgood39 contributions, latest Sep 25, 2026 · DIRECTOR, STRUCTURED FINANCE · BLOOM ENERGY · SAN JOSE, CA$7,410
Lyle J. Roth46 contributions, latest Sep 25, 2026 · GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS AND POLICY · BLOOM ENERGY · SAN JOSE, CA$6,940
Brian Vanderbloeman46 contributions, latest Sep 25, 2026 · VP, FEDERAL GOVT. AFFAIRS AND POLICY · BLOOM ENERGY · SAN JOSE, CA$6,900
Fred Mitlitsky43 contributions, latest Aug 14, 2026 · ENGINEER · BLOOM ENERGY · LIVERMORE, CA$5,450
Carlton J. CottuliOne contribution on Apr 4, 2025 · ENGINEERING · BLOOM ENERGY · FRANKLIN, MA$5,000
Ryan HallumOne contribution on Apr 2, 2025 · VICE PRESIDENT OF BUSINESS OPERATIONS · BLOOM ENERGY · REDWOOD CITY, CA$5,000
Christopher J. HeldOne contribution on Apr 14, 2025 · SR. DIRECTOR REMOTE MONITORING & CONTR · BLOOM ENERGY · SAN JOSE, CA$5,000
Aaron HooverOne contribution on Nov 21, 2025 · HEAD OF BUSINESS & CORPORATE DEV. · BLOOM ENERGY · HOUSTON, TX$5,000
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 903 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $165.3K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$1,3100.8%
Total reported receipts $167,762
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $165,341 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $6.1K
$6.1K+
$24.6K+
$55.3K+
$98.3K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California864 contributions · 93%
$153,621
Massachusetts1 contribution · 3%
$5,000
Texas1 contribution · 3%
$5,000
Illinois1 contribution · 0.6%
$1,000
Nevada36 contributions · 0.4%
$720
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $144,500 reported
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$142,50099%
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$2,0001.4%
Total reported disbursements $144,500
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $142,500 itemized
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$142,500100%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$142,500
Paid to
Claudia Tenney for Congress$10,000
Crapo Victory Committee$7,500
Graham Majority Fund$5,000
DCCC$5,000
NRCC$5,000
Congressional Black Caucus PAC$5,000
Total itemized disbursements $142,500
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 53 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
$144.5K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $44K, Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
$144.5K
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, Bloom Energy pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$1.3M
Quarterly reports read
23
Bills it named
13
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Taxation/Internal Revenue Codein 15 report entries · 2 bills named
In its own words
Issues related to implementation of H.R. 5376 (P.L. 117-169) Inflation Reduction Act.
P.L. 119-21 - An Act to Provide for Reconciliation Pursuant to Title II of H. Con. Res. 14 (One Big Beautiful Bill) - issues related with implementation of energy tax credits.
P.L. 119-21: An Act to Provide for Reconciliation Pursuant to Title II of H. Con. Res. 14 (One Big Beautiful Bill); provisions related to implementation of tax credits
Issues related to implementation of USC 48(c)(1)(E) - Qualified fuel cell property.
Energy tax issues related to investment tax credit.
Issues related to the implementation of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Public Law No: 117-58).
P.L. 119-21 - An Act to Provide for Reconciliation Pursuant to Title II of H. Con. Res. 14 (One Big Beautiful Bill) - issues related with implementation of energy tax credits.
Issues related to addressing energy delivery challenges associated with demand for data centers and AI Infrastructure.
S. 3839 - The Ratepayer Affordability and Transparency in Energy Act of 2026 (RATE Act).
H.R. 9340: Ratepayer Protection Act; provisions related to grid interconnection and flexible generation agreements S. 3839: Ratepayer Affordability and Transparency in Energy (RATE) Act of 2026; provisions related to addressing energy delivery challenges associated with demands for data centers and AI infrastructure S. 5028: Ratepayer Protection Act; provisions related to grid interconnection and flexible generation agreements
H.R. 9340: Ratepayer Protection Act; provisions related to grid interconnection and flexible generation agreements S. 3839: Ratepayer Affordability and Transparency in Energy (RATE) Act of 2026; provisions related to addressing energy delivery challenges associated with demands for data centers and AI infrastructure
Issues related to the deployment of fuel cells, electrolyzers, hydrogen, and carbon capture; Issues related to onsite power generation and grid stability; Issues related to permitting reform.
Defensein 7 report entries · 7 bills named
In its own words
H.R. 3838: Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026; provisions related to military base readiness H.R. 4016: Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026; provisions related to Department of Defense funding associated with military base energy resiliency H.R. 8800: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027; provisions related to funding associated with military base energy resiliency S. 2296: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026; provisions related to military base readiness S. 2572: Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026; provisions related to Department of Defense funding associated with military base energy resiliency S. 4784: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027; provisions related to funding associated with military base energy resiliency P.L. 119-75 (H.R. 7148): Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026; provisions related to Department of Defense funding associated with military base energy resiliency
H.R. 3838: Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026; provisions related to military base readiness H.R. 4016: Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026; provisions related to Department of Defense funding associated with military base energy resiliency S. 2296: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026; provisions related to military base readiness S. 2572: Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026; provisions related to Department of Defense funding associated with military base energy resiliency P.L. 119-75 (H.R. 7148): Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026; provisions related to Department of Defense funding associated with military base energy resiliency (Senate) FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act related to Department of Defense funding associated with military base energy resiliency
Budget/Appropriationsin 4 report entries · 1 bill named
In its own words
NEW: Department of Defense Appropriations S. 2572 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026? Provisions related to Bloom Energy appropriations requests.
No Senate bill number? Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2027? Provisions related to Bloom Energy Appropriations requests.
Department of Defense Appropriations S. 2572 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 - Provisions related to Bloom Energy appropriations requests.
No Bill number - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2027 - Provisions related to Bloom Energy Appropriations requests.
Department of Defense Appropriations S. 2572 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 -Pro
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $82.5K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
National Republican Senatorial Committee$7.5K
DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$5K
DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE$5K
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE$5K
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE$5K
REP. CLAUDIA TENNEY$5K
REP. JAMES PANETTA$5K
SEN. DAN SULLIVAN, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE$5K
SEN. DAVE MCCORMICK, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE, REPUBLICAN FEDERAL COMMITTEE OF PENNSYLVANIA$5K
SEN. MARTIN HEINRICH$5K
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “BLOOM ENERGY”, found by searching “BLOOM ENERGY”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 26, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Bloom Energy Corp. PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
CTClaudia TenneyRepublican · U.S. House · NY-24 · via Claudia Tenney For Congress2 payments, latest Mar 18, 2026 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Mar 18, 2026$10K
$142.5K across 46 recipient committees, or 99% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Bloom Energy902 contributions · 100% of ranked
$163,341
A further $2,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,310) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Engineer90 contributions · 10% of ranked
$16,262
VP Investor Relations14 contributions · 6.1% of ranked
$9,993
DIR Supply Chain Management41 contributions · 5.7% of ranked
$9,362
SR DIR Program Management39 contributions · 4.6% of ranked
$7,488
Director Structured Finance39 contributions · 4.5% of ranked
$7,410
Government Affairs And Policy46 contributions · 4.2% of ranked
$6,940
VP Federal Govt Affairs And Policy46 contributions · 4.2% of ranked
$6,900
CEO1 contribution · 3.1% of ranked
$5,000
A further $2,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,310) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Tax issues related to the treatment of fuel cells, electrolyzers, hydrogen, and carbon capture. P.L. 119-21 (H.R. 1): One Big Beautiful Bill implementation
Issues related to the deployment of fuel cells, electrolyzers, hydrogen, and carbon capture; Issues related to onsite power generation and grid stability.
NEW: Department of Defense Appropriations S. 2572 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026? Provisions related to Bloom Energy appropriations requests.
No Senate bill number? Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2027? Provisions related to Bloom Energy Appropriations requests.
Department of Defense Appropriations S. 2572 - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 - Provisions related to Bloom Energy appropriations requests.
No Bill number - Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2027 - Provisions related to Bloom Energy Appropriations requests.
Lobbying on measures associated with military base readiness in the National Defense Authorization Act, 2026 (S. 2296/H.R. 3838).
H.R. 4016/S. 2572 (P.L. 119-75) - FY26 Department of Defense funding associated with military base energy resiliency.