This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$5.6K to 1 candidate
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $5,642
Democratic 100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
No candidate contributions were itemized by this committee in the selected cycle.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $95,358 reported receipts
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$52,43855%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$40,00042%
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$2,2332.3%
Largest donors
Jacqueline Wu16 contributions, latest Jun 28, 2026 · POLICY MANAGER · OCAPICA · EL MONTE, CA$1,600
Alexander Tom6 contributions, latest Dec 1, 2025 · DIRECTOR · CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATIO · OAKLAND, CA$150
Liba Rubenstein6 contributions, latest Dec 28, 2025 · PROGRAM DIRECTOR · ASPEN INSTITUTE · LOS ANGELES, CA$108
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 3 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 28 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.9K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $98,725 reported
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$62,08363%
Paid to
OC Action4 payments · latest Jan 28, 2025 · PAC STAFF SALARY AND BENEFITS$42,833
2102 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVESUITE 130IRVINE, CA, 92612
Audits and penalties
None published by the FEC
LobbyingWhat does its sponsor lobby on?
What Orange County Sheriff's Office lobbies on 2026 reports
Besides giving through its PAC, Orange County Sheriff's Office pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$1.1M
Quarterly reports read
55
Bills it named
14
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Budget/Appropriationsin 38 report entries · 8 bills named
In its own words
- Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations. - Issues related to the Urban Area Security Initiative. - Homeland Security Appropriations and FEMA disaster response. - Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations. - Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations.
- Transportation, Housing, and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Appropriations. - Homeland Security Appropriations and FEMA disaster response. - Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations. - Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations.
Orange County PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Super PAC (independent expenditure-only). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$5850.6%
Other receiptsWhere a super PAC files what corporations, unions and other organizations give it, since they have no line of their own. Hybrid PACs, and some super PACs, file individuals' unlimited gifts here too, along with any interest or dividends.$1020.1%
Total reported receipts $95,358
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $1,858 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $74
$74+
$297+
$669+
$1.2K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California28 contributions · 100%
$1,858
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Ocapica16 contributions · 86% of ranked
$1,600
Center For Empowered Politics Educatio6 contributions · 8.1% of ranked
$150
Aspen Institute6 contributions · 5.8% of ranked
$108
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($585) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Policy Manager16 contributions · 86% of ranked
$1,600
Director6 contributions · 8.1% of ranked
$150
Program Director6 contributions · 5.8% of ranked
$108
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($585) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Spent for or against
Derek TranSupport · 1 record · latest Feb 13, 2025$5,642
Total reported disbursements $98,725
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
What the payments were for $61,121 itemized
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $5,642 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$31,39751%
Filed as
PAC STAFF SALARY AND BENEFITS$28,507
PAC STAFF TIME$2,890
Paid to
OC Action$28,507
Chispa PAC Sponsored by Chispa, a Project of Tides Advocacy$2,890
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$18,39530%
Filed as
PAC PHONE SERVICES$9,379
PAC FOOD/BEVERAGES$4,517
WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE$4,069
PAC CAMPAIGN SUPPLIES$429
Paid to
OC Action$14,326
State Compensation Insurance Fund$4,069
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$8,75114%
Filed as
LEGAL & TREASURY FEES$7,628
LEGAL & COMPLIANCE FEES$1,123
Paid to
Beaver Legal Corp.$8,751
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$1,8753.1%
Filed as
DATABASE LICENSING$1,875
Paid to
NGP VAN$1,875
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$7041.2%
Filed as
LEGAL & TREASURY EXPENSES$595
LEGAL & COMPLIANCE EXPENSES$109
Paid to
Beaver Legal Corp.$704
Total itemized disbursements $61,121
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 39 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
OC Action4 payments · 43% of all spending
$42,833
Beaver Legal Corp.16 payments · 9.6% of all spending
$9,454
State Compensation Insurance Fund3 payments · 4.1% of all spending
$4,069
Chispa PAC Sponsored by Chispa, a Project of Tides Advocacy1 payment · 2.9% of all spending
$2,890
NGP VAN15 payments · 1.9% of all spending
$1,875
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Spending over time
$98.7K spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $61.8K, Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
$98.7K
Jan 2025Sep 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Each report’s total
Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026$788
Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026$31,343
Jan 1 – Mar 31, 2026$1,328
Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025$3,451
Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025$61,815
Support of FY 26 Interior and Environment and Related Agencies appropriations for water infrastructure funding for PFAS cleanup of groundwater, H.R. 4754 Support for Community Project submissions related to PFAS contaminated groundwater clean-up. as part of FY 27 appropriations process.
FY 2027 Community Project Funding/Congressional Directed Spending;
H.R. 7386, First Responder Network Authority Reauthorization;
H.R. 2358, CARE Act
Public Law 119-21, One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Implementation Medicaid related issues H.R.9260, Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027, Medicaid program related issues
Monitor and support FY 27 Interior and Environment and Related Agencies Appropriations, H.R. 9171 related to USEPA State Revolving Loan Fund, WIFIA and PFAS research funding.
Support obligation of congressionally directed project funding.
Public Law 119-21, One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Implementation Medicaid related issues; and Interim final rule on Community engagement requirement H.R.9260, Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027, Medicaid program related issues Local medicaid hospital related issue Medicaid Waivers Health insurance marketplace (Covered California) State provider taxes Oversight, Fraud, Waste and Abuse related issues Medicaid state directed payment issues
Public Law 119-21, One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Implementation Medicaid related issues; and Interim final rule on Community engagement requirement H.R.9260, Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027, Medicaid program related issues Medicaid Waivers Health insurance marketplace (Covered California) State provider taxes Oversight, Fraud, Waste and Abuse related issues Medicaid state directed payment issues
Public Law 119-21, One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Implementation Medicaid related issues
Funding related to medical facilities, equipment and programs; Medicaid reform
Funding related to medical facilities, equipment and programs
Clean Air and Water (quality)in 8 report entries · 4 bills named
In its own words
Monitor development of draft guidance on PFAS and biosolids land application.
Support of passive receivers liability exemption legislation, inlcding H.R. 1267 and amendment to NDAA, S. 2296.
Support obligation of financial assistance related to PFAS treatment technology demonstration.
Monitor development of biosolids/PFAS risk assessment model development.
Support of passive receivers liability exemption legislation, H.R. 1267.
Support of obligation of Community Project assistance for water quality improvements.
Support of validated drinking water standards related to PFAS drinking water standards. Support of sediment removal from flood protection facility language in Water Resources Development Act of 2026 (S. 9497/S. 4949)
Support of validated drinking water standards related to PFAS drinking water standards. Support of sediment removal from flood protection facility language in Water Resources Development Act of 2026.
Monitor publication of biosolids land application guidance. Support of passive receivers liability exemption legislation, H.R. 1267 and amendment to NDAA, S. 2296.
- General issues related to water quality and supply. - Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 2026.
Aviation Fuel Tax issues. Alternative fuel tax credits in FY 26 and Fy 27 Appropriations legislation and tax extenders legislation and budget legislation to include Budget Reconciliation packages.
Aviation Fuel Tax issues. Alternative fuel tax credits in FY 26 and Fy 27 Appropriations legislation and tax extenders legislation and budget legislation.
Health Care related issues and initiatives
State provider taxes
No lobbying activity
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
SENATE
Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
Educationin 7 report entries
In its own words
Preserving and strengthening student financial aid programs and timely aid disbursement); opposing cuts and supporting increased funding in the Labor-HHS-Education appropriations bill for Minority-Serving Institutions and workforce programs such as WIOA; advancing federal policies and resources that address students basic needs; and advocating for policies and resources that support undocumented students access and success in higher education.
Community Project funding, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act funding, Title I funding, federal grant procurement.
Community Project funding, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act funding, Title I funding, federal grant procurement
Medicare/Medicaidin 5 report entries · 1 bill named
In its own words
Public Law 119-21, One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Implementation Medicaid related issues; and Interim final rule on Community engagement requirement H.R.9260, Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027, Medicaid program related issues Local medicaid hospital related issue Medicaid Waivers State provider taxes Oversight, Fraud, Waste and Abuse related issues Medicaid state directed payment issues
Public Law 119-21, One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Implementation Medicaid related issues; and Interim final rule on Community engagement requirement H.R.9260, Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2027, Medicaid program related issues Medicaid Waivers State provider taxes Oversight, Fraud, Waste and Abuse related issues Medicaid state directed payment issues
Public Law 119-21, One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Implementation Medicaid related issues Oversight, Fraud, Waste and Abuse related issues Medicaid state directed payment issues
Holland & Knight LLPLobbying firm · 3 reportsNot reported
Nossaman LLPLobbying firm · 3 reportsNot reported
Contributions on the LD-203 report
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $59.3K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Laurel Lee$8K
Greg Steube$3K
Debbie Wasserman Schultz$2.5K
Randy Fine$2.5K
Salud Carbajal$2.5K
Shevrin Jones$2.5K
Ashley Moody$2K
Darren Soto$2K
Jimmy Patronis$2K
Mike Haridopolos$2K
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE”, found by searching “ORANGE COUNTY”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 26, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.