Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00718221 · files quarterly
“Ashley Hinson is a conservative mom on a mission to make Washington run more like the great state of Iowa. She is working alongside President Trump to secure our borders, cut wasteful spending, and put our country back on the path to prosperity.”
Ashley Hinson Victory Committee, on its own site, ashleyhinson.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
7 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Ashley has always believed it is YOUR money, not the government’s money.
She has been laser focused on lowering taxes for working families and empowering all Iowans with opportunities.
Help more families become homeowners by allowing first-time homebuyers to save tax-free for a down payment through the First Home Savings Opportunity Act and ensuring large institutional investors cannot buy up single-family homes in Iowa neighborhoods.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ashleyhinson.com/issues
Heading as listed on ashleyhinson.com/issues ↗ (opens ashleyhinson.com/issues at this heading)
No matter where you live in Iowa, you should be able to access quality healthcare without driving hours or worrying about the cost.
A medical decision shouldn’t be a financial decision.
Ashley has worked across the aisle to improve rural healthcare, lower prescription drug costs, and support moms, seniors, veterans, and patients across Iowa who deserve better care.
Lower prescription drug costs by increasing transparency and holding pharmacy benefit managers accountable. Ashley has also been a champion for expanding over-the-counter birth control access.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ashleyhinson.com/issues
Heading as listed on ashleyhinson.com/issues ↗ (opens ashleyhinson.com/issues at this heading)
Agriculture is the lifeblood of Iowa’s economy.
Farmers don’t need Washington telling them how to run their operations and handing down regulations, they need an advocate who understands the challenges they face.
That’s why Ashley has consistently worked across the aisle to support family farms, strengthen rural communities, and champion Iowa biofuels.
Protect family farms by pushing back against burdensome regulations, improving voluntary conservation programs, and fighting policies like California’s Proposition 12 that hurt Iowa family farmers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ashleyhinson.com/issues
Heading as listed on ashleyhinson.com/issues ↗ (opens ashleyhinson.com/issues at this heading)
Every family deserves to feel safe in their home and community.
Ashley believes public safety starts with enforcing our laws, supporting law enforcement, and securing our border.
She’ll continue fighting for commonsense policies that protect Iowa families while ensuring our immigration system is fair, lawful, and secure.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ashleyhinson.com/issues
Heading as listed on ashleyhinson.com/issues ↗ (opens ashleyhinson.com/issues at this heading)
Ashley has been fighting to restore integrity to public service and ensure the government works for the people, not the other way around.
Ban Members of Congress from trading individual stocks and betting on prediction markets.
Clean up Washington by enacting commonsense lobbying bans, moving government agencies out of DC and closer to the people they serve, and rooting out waste, fraud, and abuse of tax dollars.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ashleyhinson.com/issues
Heading as listed on ashleyhinson.com/issues ↗ (opens ashleyhinson.com/issues at this heading)
The men and women who wore our nation’s uniform kept their promise to America.
Ashley believes America must keep its promise to them.
She has worked across party lines to improve veterans’ healthcare and mental health services, and she’ll continue making sure veterans receive the care, respect, and benefits they’ve earned.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ashleyhinson.com/issues
Heading as listed on ashleyhinson.com/issues ↗ (opens ashleyhinson.com/issues at this heading)
Iowa values are built on faith, family, freedom, and personal responsibility.
Ashley believes those values are worth protecting here at home and against growing threats abroad.
She’ll continue standing up for parents, defending our constitutional freedoms, and ensuring America remains the world’s largest super power.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ashleyhinson.com/issues
Heading as listed on ashleyhinson.com/issues ↗ (opens ashleyhinson.com/issues at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to CITIZENS UNITED · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to COUNCIL OF INSURANCE AGENTS & BROKERS · 1 payment | $7.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to EXPRESS SERVICES, INC. · 1 payment | $4K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to HALLADOR ENERGY COMPANY · 1 payment | $3.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to GLOBE LIFE INC. · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to DIAZ-BALART · 1 payment |
$46K from 14 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ASHLEY HINSON VICTORY COMMITTEE · 39 payments | $3M |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ARENHOLZ · 21 payments | $422.7K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 8 payments | $279.3K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to ASHLEY HINSON VICTORY COMMITTEE · 5 payments | $150K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $5.8K |
$3.9M across 5 recipient committees, or 63% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 73,730 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $4.5M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $6,554,385
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,611 contributions · 29% | $1,328,231 |
| 9,974 contributions · 11% |
Total reported disbursements $6,118,800
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$6.1M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $2.1M, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Ashley Hinson Victory Committee is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (nonqualified). It is a joint fundraiser. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Ashley Hinson Victory Committee is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $2.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $2K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN MOTORCYCLIST ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $1.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to SCALISE LEADERSHIP FUND 2024 · 1 payment | $1K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $1K |
| $493,028 |
| 8,568 contributions · 8.6% | $390,475 |
| 6,079 contributions · 8% | $361,369 |
| 760 contributions · 5.4% | $242,795 |
| 1,855 contributions · 4.4% | $198,415 |
| 942 contributions · 3% | $135,064 |
| 3,372 contributions · 2.9% | $129,589 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 65,638 contributions · 45% of ranked | $1,719,929 |
| Written instead of an employer · 2,255 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $246,934 |
| 1 contribution · 1.7% of ranked | $65,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 295 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $55,685 |
| 4 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $54,333 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $52,800 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $52,800 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $42,000 |
A further $334,751 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,626,424) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 65,611 contributions · 42% of ranked | $1,736,449 |
| 232 contributions · 7.4% of ranked | $308,203 |
| 76 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $162,088 |
| 69 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $136,622 |
| 124 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $78,626 |
| 20 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $70,042 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 312 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $63,217 |
| 322 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $57,353 |
A further $329,622 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,626,424) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $6,118,800
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 440 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 39 payments · 49% of all spending | $3,011,365 |
| 19 payments · 27% of all spending | $1,660,778 |
| 21 payments · 6.9% of all spending | $422,689 |
| 8 payments · 4.6% of all spending | $279,250 |
| 100 payments · 3% of all spending | $183,526 |
| 5 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $150,000 |
| 17 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $142,033 |
| 31 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $101,209 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.