Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00681825 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“Finding and supporting strong candidates and current elected officials who will fight tirelessly for…
Legislation and policy that promotes the safety of our nation’s officers and their families.”
Law Enforcement for a Safer America PAC, on its own site, nationalemergencyresponderscoalition.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
5 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
First responders place themselves directly in harm’s way and face disasters every day while protecting and serving our communities.
We owe it to these brave men and women to assure that the right elected leaders are in place to press for legislation that will protect them while they risk their lives for us.
Your donations will provide resources for our PAC to identify and support those candidates who will push hard for:
- Legislation and policy that promotes the safety of our First Responders.
- Legislation that helps them go home safe and secure every night and at the end of their career.
- Prompting legislators to protect the benefits of the families of First Responders who are killed while protecting us.
- Making available the tools and resources needed by these men and women to do their jobs safely and effectively.
Thank you for your support!
Not printed at government expense.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalemergencyresponderscoalition.org
Finding and supporting strong candidates and current elected officials who will fight tirelessly for…
Legislation and policy that promotes the safety of our nation’s officers and their families.
Increased punishment for crimes against law enforcement officers and increased officer protections.
Tougher penalties on attackers of Law Enforcement Officers.
Tougher penalties for repeat offenders of violent crimes.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalemergencyresponderscoalition.org
“We owe it to our Emergency Responders to push for leaders who fight for laws that will protect them while they are serving our communities. ”
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalemergencyresponderscoalition.org
“The PAC is on the front line in pushing for reforms in Federal Law that enhances these protections and provides the tools and training to meet these critical goals.”
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalemergencyresponderscoalition.org
The PAC endorses legislators that support the enactment of laws that best enable Law Enforcement Professionals to most effectively protect and serve our communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalemergencyresponderscoalition.org
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,132 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $142.1K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $4,006,635
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 141 contributions · 13% | $17,805 |
| 89 contributions · 10% | $14,487 |
| 67 contributions · 8.1% | $11,450 |
Total reported disbursements $4,033,653
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $272,880 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.2M, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Law Enforcement for a Safer America PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Super PAC (independent expenditure-only). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Law Enforcement for a Safer America PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| 68 contributions · 6.6% |
| $9,360 |
| 43 contributions · 4.6% | $6,485 |
| 25 contributions · 4.4% | $6,255 |
| 62 contributions · 4.3% | $6,125 |
| 62 contributions · 3.8% | $5,389 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 617 contributions · 70% of ranked | $52,904 |
| 16 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $3,490 |
| 2 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $2,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 5 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $1,250 |
| 6 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $1,205 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $1,095 |
| 2 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $655 |
| 2 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $605 |
A further $66,290 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,813,641) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 617 contributions · 72% of ranked | $53,849 |
| 12 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $3,220 |
| 7 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $1,780 |
| 6 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $1,105 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked | $1,095 |
| 3 contributions · 1% of ranked | $715 |
| 5 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $610 |
| 2 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $600 |
A further $67,365 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,813,641) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $3,619,970
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 592 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 22 payments · 42% of all spending | $1,680,798 |
| 22 payments · 19% of all spending | $785,694 |
| 22 payments · 8.6% of all spending | $345,018 |
| 97 payments · 4.8% of all spending | $195,305 |
| 22 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $134,274 |
| 22 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $128,700 |
| 22 payments · 3% of all spending | $121,611 |
| 22 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $69,429 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.