Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00638320 · files quarterly
“The Democratic Attorneys General Association (DAGA) is the only committee solely dedicated to electing and supporting Democratic state Attorneys General. Democratic AGs currently hold 23 seats and represent the most diverse coalition of Democratic AGs in history.”
Daga PAC, on its own site, dems.ag
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
13 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Democratic AGs have proven to be one of the most effective champions at defending health care access in this country.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issues
Time and time again, Democratic AGs have stood up to defend the right to access quality, affordable health care.
In 2020, Donald Trump teamed up with Republican AGs in a reckless and dangerous attempt to destroy the Affordable Care Act with no replacement in sight.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issue/health-care
Heading as listed on dems.ag ↗ (opens dems.ag at this heading)
Workers are the driving force of this country, and Democratic AGs are committed to fighting alongside workers and unions to ensure safe conditions with fair pay that is free of harassment and discrimination.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issues
From taking on payroll fraud and stolen pay, to holding employers accountable for unsafe or unhealthy working conditions, to helping to secure PPE and other critical resources for frontline workers when COVID-19 began to spread, Democratic AGs aren’t afraid to take on powerful interests on behalf of workers.
- The Hill
Dem AGs warn federal workers about ‘misleading’ Trump buyout offers
- New York Times
- WSLS
Attorney General Mark Herring creates Virginia’s first worker protection unit
- ENR
- Bloomberg Law
- Fox47
- Eater New York
- VT Digger
State [Attorney General] trying to free up money for Koffee Kup workers
- IL Press Release
- MN Press Release
Multistate lawsuit to stop mass firings of federal probationary employees
- NJ Press Release
- NY Press Release
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issue/worker-protections
Heading as listed on dems.ag ↗ (opens dems.ag at this heading)
Who we elect to be our states’ top legal officer matters more than ever.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issues
Americans’ voting rights and the integrity of U.S. elections are under attack.
In partnership with Secretaries of State and local election officials, Democratic AGs have been on the frontlines protecting our vote and our access to the ballot, taking on voter suppression and misinformation, defending mail-in voting, and stopping extremist politicians and partisans from overturning millions of lawfully cast ballots in the 2020 presidential election.
Ford joins state AGs warning that Republicans are imperiling democracy
Washington joins lawsuit to fight US Postal Service ballot delays
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issue/voting-rights
Heading as listed on dems.ag ↗ (opens dems.ag at this heading)
Following the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade, Democratic AGs sprung into action to defend reproductive rights and abortion access in their states.
Dem AGs will never stop fighting to ensure that everyone — no matter where they live — can access safe and affordable reproductive health care.
Fortunately, they have a long, successful track record of defending and advancing reproductive justice in America.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issues
Democratic AGs sue FDA over “unnecessary” abortion pill restrictions
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issue/abortion-rights
Heading as listed on dems.ag ↗ (opens dems.ag at this heading)
Keeping our communities safe has never been more important, and Democratic AGs across the country are fighting to do just that.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issues
Taking on human trafficking and sexual predators,
- Protecting kids’ safety online,
- Going after hate groups and violent extremists,
- Getting illegal and untraceable ghost guns out of the hands of violent criminals,
- Working to pass common sense, bipartisan gun safety reforms to end school shootings,
- Holding opioid manufacturers accountable for their role in the opioid crisis and getting much-needed resources to the communities that need it most, or
- Advocating for federal resources that support local law enforcement and community organizations
Democratic AGs are working every day to ensure that everyone can feel safe, healthy, and secure at home, at school, and in their communities.
More than a dozen state attorneys general file lawsuit challenging Musk and DOGE’s authority
[Colorado] Attorney general announcing crackdown on human trafficking, money laundering
Legislators must close ‘ghost gun’ loophole in gun-safety laws
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issue/public-safety
Heading as listed on dems.ag ↗ (opens dems.ag at this heading)
As their state’s chief consumer protection enforcers, Democratic AGs use the power of their offices to protect families, children, seniors and consumers from bad actors that attempt to cause harm.
Whether it’s taking on predatory lending, price gouging, robocalls, or raising awareness about scams that target vulnerable communities, the work of Democratic AGs makes a real difference in the lives of working families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issues
Democratic AGs have taken on some of the biggest consumer fights across the country and won – returning millions of dollars to their states and constituents.
Democratic AGs sue over DOGE access to Treasury payment systems
Pa. reaches settlements with Experian, T-Mobile over data breaches
Washington AG’s office stops alleged jewelry pyramid scheme
Maine announces settlement to reduce insulin costs
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issue/consumer-protections
Heading as listed on dems.ag ↗ (opens dems.ag at this heading)
Democratic AGs are among the most effective champions at keeping our communities safe, defending our rights, and holding bad actors accountable.
From public safety and workers' rights, to climate action and election defense, Democratic AGs are front and center on the issues that drive us all.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issues
Heading as listed on dems.ag/issues ↗ (opens dems.ag/issues at this heading)
Democratic AGs are at the forefront of the fight against climate change and are some of the most effective advocates for climate protection.
Every day, they work to protect our communities and public lands, and hold polluters accountable.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issues
In the fight against climate change, Democratic AGs play a pivotal role in protecting our planet, people, and economy, while Republican AGs have continued to put ideology and partisan games over our health and economy.
States take on PFAS ‘forever chemicals’ with bans and lawsuits
Illinois Attorney General sues 3M, other makers of ‘forever chemicals’
Walmart agrees to $7.5M settlement over illegal dumping
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issue/climate-action
Heading as listed on dems.ag/issues ↗ (opens dems.ag/issues at this heading)
The Office of State Attorney General can either be a champion for progress or a defender of regressive status quo policies — and that is why it is crucial that we fight for every state AG seat in every election.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issues
Despite the progress that has been made, systems of discrimination and racism continue to create barriers that result in disparate outcomes for communities of color — from health care and housing, to climate policy and education, to workplaces, policing, and the criminal justice system.
Racial justice IS criminal justice, economic justice, reproductive justice, and climate justice.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issue/justice-reform
Heading as listed on dems.ag/issues ↗ (opens dems.ag/issues at this heading)
Everyone deserves a safe place to call home.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issues
Democratic AGs are working tirelessly to protect tenants from abusive and predatory management companies, advance affordable housing options in their communities, fight discrimination, ensure safe drinking water, and more.
California sues former owner of troubled affordable-housing development in Chinatown
California attorney general charges L.A.-area real estate agent with price gouging in wake of wildfires
Attorney General Brown Files Amicus Brief Urging Supreme Court of Maryland to Take Up HOME Act Appeal and Protect Fair Housing Rights
California attorney general announces housing strike force
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issue/housing
Heading as listed on dems.ag/issues ↗ (opens dems.ag/issues at this heading)
Democratic AGs are determined to protect, uphold, and advance the rights of all people — no matter who you love or how you identify.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issues
With as much progress as we’ve made in recent years, the rights of LGBTQIA+ communities in the United States continue to be at risk, as far right legislatures and Republican Attorneys General use their positions to attack and demean transgender people, block anti-discrimination efforts, rollback protections for LGBTQIA+ veterans and servicemembers, and more.
Every person deserves to live their life as their true and authentic self, which is why ensuring that we have State Attorneys General willing to defend the rights of LGBTQIA individuals is so important.
AG Phil Weiser backs Coloradan fighting for gender-neutral passport
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dems.ag/issue/lgbtqia-equality
Heading as listed on dems.ag/issues ↗ (opens dems.ag/issues at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $5K · 100% |
| All recipients | 1 | $5K |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $25K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $2K |
The 14 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $4.9M from 6 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
The 5 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports. Here they come to $33.5K, more than the $17K this committee's own reports show on the line.
Total reported receipts $6,037,251
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 85 contributions · 45% | $255,425 |
| 470 contributions · 11% | $61,293 |
| 116 contributions · 7% |
Total reported disbursements $5,987,275
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $4.2M, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Daga PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Its FEC record names Daga Individual PAC as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Daga PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $1K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES INC. · 1 payment | $500 |
$43.5K from 6 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
$5K across 1 recipient committee, or <0.1% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $39,510 |
| 28 contributions · 5.7% | $32,295 |
| 105 contributions · 3.7% | $20,612 |
| 189 contributions · 3.3% | $18,475 |
| 120 contributions · 3.1% | $17,175 |
| 100 contributions · 2.6% | $14,431 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 contributions · 45% of ranked | $250,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,506 contributions · 32% of ranked | $178,724 |
| Written instead of an employer · 268 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $30,698 |
| 5 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% of ranked | $3,442 |
A further $877 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($460,334) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 contributions · 45% of ranked | $255,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,349 contributions · 30% of ranked | $166,337 |
| 150 contributions · 9% of ranked | $50,497 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 149 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $8,565 |
| 9 contributions · 1% of ranked | $5,850 |
| 5 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $877 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($460,334) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $584,374
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 192 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
19 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $6,126 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 37 payments · 8.1% of all spending | $487,228 |
| 14 payments · 0.6% of all spending | $36,981 |
| 96 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $29,934 |
| 4 payments · 0.1% of all spending | $6,945 |
| 18 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $5,943 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 18 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $4,950 |
| 2 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $3,676 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.