Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00620021 · files quarterly
“Common Defense organizes veterans and engages the military community to transform our society by advocating for progressive policies that work for all of us.”
Common Defense Action Fund, on its own site, commondefense.us
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
2 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Whatever the issue, wherever we're needed, Common Defense members are fighting for the values we swore to uphold—ensuring that liberty and justice truly are for all.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · commondefense.us
We fought hard to finally stop America’s longest war with our End the Forever War Campaign in 2020 and we refuse to let Trump or any president drag us into new Forever Wars.
Restore congressional authority over war powers.
Ensure Congress votes against any supplemental funding for Trump's illegal war in Iran.
Pass the Block the Bombs Act to stop the transfer of weapons to Israel.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · commondefense.us
Heading as listed on commondefense.us ↗ (opens commondefense.us at this heading)
Trump is deploying masked federal agents and troops into our neighborhoods.
As veterans, we know this isn’t what we swore an oath to defend.
Exposing the use of military troops against American civilians
Speaking out against treating our communities like occupied zones
Defending our oath to protect Americans, not intimidate them
Resisting the authoritarian use of service members as political pawns
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · commondefense.us
Heading as listed on commondefense.us ↗ (opens commondefense.us at this heading)
Trump is trying to gut veteran healthcare for billionaire tax breaks.
We’re fighting back to protect the care veterans were promised and deserve.
Forced the regime to back down on 37% of proposed VA cuts
Mobilizing veterans nationwide against healthcare privatization
Exposing the betrayal of America's veterans for billionaire tax breaks
Keeping pressure on to prevent any permanent cuts from passing
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · commondefense.us
Heading as listed on commondefense.us ↗ (opens commondefense.us at this heading)
Heading as listed on commondefense.us ↗ (opens commondefense.us at this heading)
We envision a world free of structural violence where everyday people are civically engaged in the decisions that impact their lives.
We see a grassroots movement of veteran leaders united at the forefront of struggles to foster an inclusive democracy where liberty and justice truly exist for all.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · commondefense.us/about-us
Heading as listed on commondefense.us/about-us ↗ (opens commondefense.us/about-us at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 6 | $7,500 | $508,665 | $516,165 | 59% |
| Other or unresolved | 2 | $0 | $359,494 | $359,494 | 41% |
| Shown support | 8 | $7,500 | $868,158 | $875,658 | 100% |
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 6 | $7.5K · 100% |
| All recipients | 6 | $7.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| New York | 1 | $2.5K |
| Maine | 1 | $1K |
| Michigan | 1 | $1K |
| New Jersey | 1 | $1K |
| North Carolina | 1 | $1K |
| Minnesota | 1 | $1K |
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
The 14 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $1.2M from 4 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $1,823,490
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 103 contributions · 17% | $13,238 |
| 14 contributions · 17% | $12,850 |
| 11 contributions · 7.9% | $5,987 |
| 53 contributions · 6.9% | $5,271 |
Total reported disbursements $1,846,219
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $931,490 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
Total itemized disbursements $17,602
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
$1.8M spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $941.3K, Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Sep 30, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Common Defense Action Fund is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Common Defense Action Fund is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $2.5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $1K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ABDUL FOR MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $1K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $1K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $1K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FIGHT BACK MIDWEST · 1 payment | $1K |
$7.5K across 6 recipient committees, or 0.4% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $3,862 |
| 28 contributions · 4.7% | $3,577 |
| 7 contributions · 3.6% | $2,750 |
| 9 contributions · 3.4% | $2,550 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 26 contributions · 24% of ranked | $4,130 |
| 14 contributions · 6.3% of ranked | $1,100 |
| Written instead of an employer · 2 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $750 |
| 3 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $650 |
| 2 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $600 |
| 1 contribution · 2.9% of ranked | $500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.9% of ranked | $500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.9% of ranked | $500 |
A further $58,648 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($29,753) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 325 contributions · 77% of ranked | $57,778 |
| 4 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $1,150 |
| 14 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $1,100 |
| 3 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1% of ranked | $750 |
| 10 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $700 |
| 2 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $600 |
| 6 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $550 |
A further $1,250 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($29,753) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
All 35 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 0.5% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.1% of all spending | $2,500 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $1,000 |
| 28 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $102 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.