Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00530766 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“Since 2014, Women Speak Out PAC has built the largest pro-life on-the-ground political campaign in the country. Using our proven micro-targeting strategy, we meet persuadable voters right at their front doors to educate them on the extremism of pro-abortion lawmakers and to urge these voters to choose candidates who are committed to defending life.”
Women Speak Out PAC, on its own site, wsopac.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
2 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Rob Sand and Josh Turek wear a moderate’s mask.
Underneath that mask are radical liberals who oppose all limits on abortion.
Forcing taxpayers like YOU to pay for abortions with public funds, while eliminating parental consent laws for minors seeking an abortion.
Radicals on abortion, no limits at all.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · wsopac.com/iowa
Heading as listed on wsopac.com/iowa ↗ (opens wsopac.com/iowa at this heading)
Michael Whatley and Laurie Buckhout are pro-life leaders for North Carolina families and unborn children.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · wsopac.com/nc
Alan Wilson and Darline Graham will Protect Life here in South Carolina.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · wsopac.com/sc
Candidate for Governor · Wisconsin
Tom Tiffany will Protect Life and provide real choices for Wisconsin families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · wsopac.com/wisconsin
Heading as listed on wsopac.com/nc ↗ (opens wsopac.com/nc at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 7 | $0 | $243,436 | $243,436 | 70% |
| Other or unresolved | 3 | $0 | $103,958 | $103,958 | 30% |
| Shown support | 10 | $0 | $347,394 | $347,394 | 100% |
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Other PACs and committees | 1 | $100K · 100% |
| All recipients | 1 | $100K |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $100K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 7 payments | $5.9M |
$5.9M from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to TRUMP-GRAHAM MAJORITY FUND · 1 payment | $100K |
$100K across 1 recipient committee, or 3.2% of everything this committee reports spending.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
The 10 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 2 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 51 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $15.8K. These gifts, as the FEC's contributor file lists them, come to more than the $18.9K the committee's own summary reports for this line; the two filings disagree. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $8,780,193
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 14 contributions · 40% | $6,300 |
| 1 contribution · 32% | $5,000 |
| 14 contributions · 13% | $2,100 |
| 1 contribution · 6.3% | $1,000 |
| 12 contributions · 3.5% | $555 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% | $400 |
| 7 contributions · 1.6% | $245 |
| 1 contribution · 1% |
Total reported disbursements $3,122,056
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $167,492 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$3.1M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.5M, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Women Speak Out PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Super PAC (independent expenditure-only). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Women Speak Out PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $150 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10 contributions · 34% of ranked | $1,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 15 contributions · 30% of ranked | $1,305 |
| 1 contribution · 23% of ranked | $1,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 8 contributions · 9.1% of ranked | $400 |
| 6 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $210 |
A further $11,335 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($5,740) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10 contributions · 34% of ranked | $1,500 |
| 12 contributions · 27% of ranked | $1,200 |
| 1 contribution · 23% of ranked | $1,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 8 contributions · 9.1% of ranked | $400 |
| 6 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $210 |
| 3 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $105 |
A further $11,335 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($5,740) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,044,684
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 87 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 15% of all spending | $481,316 |
| 2 payments · 8% of all spending | $250,000 |
| 1 payment · 3.2% of all spending | $101,389 |
| 1 payment · 3.2% of all spending | $100,000 |
| 17 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $57,440 |
| 7 payments · 1% of all spending | $30,260 |
| 21 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $5,250 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $5,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.