Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
Super PAC (independent expenditure-only)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Democratic Action
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00503789 · files monthly
This committee's own pages do not say what it is for. Its largest funder, Democratic Governors Association, gave 84% of its money this cycle ($13.9M), and describes its purpose:
“As the only organization dedicated to electing Democratic governors and candidates, the DGA participates at all levels of campaigns, from providing resources to fund operations to helping articulate and deliver their messages.
The DGA also helps governors lead their states. We serve as a clearinghouse of best practices to help governors and their staff share their policy successes and learn from each other.”
Democratic Governors Association, on its own site, democraticgovernors.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words. A funder’s share is of this committee’s total receipts, from its itemized FEC filings.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,510 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $223.1K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $30,246,634
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 254 contributions · 16% | $35,863 |
| 124 contributions · 7.9% | $17,690 |
| 87 contributions · 6.4% |
Total reported disbursements $28,645,774
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$28.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $10.4M, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
DGA Action is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Super PAC (independent expenditure-only). Its FEC record names Democratic Action as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
No approved organization identity yet
| $14,299 |
| 86 contributions · 5.9% | $13,220 |
| 67 contributions · 5.7% | $12,735 |
| 24 contributions · 5.2% | $11,708 |
| 57 contributions · 5% | $11,207 |
| 71 contributions · 4.9% | $11,028 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 69 contributions · 26% of ranked | $18,693 |
| 2 contributions · 14% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 6.9% of ranked | $5,010 |
| 1 contribution · 6.9% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 6 contributions · 3% of ranked | $2,200 |
| 1 contribution · 2.7% of ranked | $2,000 |
| 10 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $1,000 |
A further $150,130 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,544,024) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,233 contributions · 66% of ranked | $141,965 |
| 2 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 12 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $8,900 |
| 18 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $8,416 |
| 1 contribution · 2.3% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 15 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $3,910 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 1% of ranked | $2,100 |
A further $8,165 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,544,024) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $3,986,075
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 224 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 11 payments · 4.4% of all spending | $1,268,132 |
| 5 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $790,184 |
| 11 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $522,158 |
| 16 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $384,891 |
| 12 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $324,293 |
| 14 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $151,956 |
| 117 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $109,385 |
| 8 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $102,468 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.