Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (nonqualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Pro-Obama/Hillary Clinton Super PAC (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00495861 · files quarterly
“Priorities USA exists to build progressive power and activate every voter to participate in our democracy. We’re 100% focused on engaging voters online.”
Priorities USA Action, on its own site, priorities.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
2 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Priorities USA Action creates compelling digital campaigns that persuade voters in battleground states to elect Democrats up and down the ballot.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · priorities.org/winning-elections
We use our expertise in political digital advertising, creative development, and research and data to reach voters online.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · priorities.org/winning-elections
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $6.5M from 16 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $6,762,658
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 91 contributions · 40% | $4,160 |
| 42 contributions · 36% | $3,750 |
| 3 contributions · 9.1% | $950 |
| 15 contributions · 7.2% | $750 |
| 1 contribution · 2.4% | $250 |
| 6 contributions · 1.4% | $150 |
| 6 contributions · 1.4% | $150 |
| 3 contributions · 1.4% |
Total reported disbursements $4,767,575
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $510
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 15 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 15 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $510 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
$4.8M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.9M, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Pro-Obama/Hillary Clinton Super PAC Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Priorities USA Action is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $150 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 93 contributions · 47% of ranked | $4,910 |
| 18 contributions · 17% of ranked | $1,800 |
| 18 contributions · 17% of ranked | $1,800 |
| 15 contributions · 7.2% of ranked | $750 |
| 2 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $450 |
| 6 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $150 |
| 3 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $150 |
| 6 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $150 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($310) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 66 contributions · 37% of ranked | $3,810 |
| 18 contributions · 17% of ranked | $1,800 |
| 18 contributions · 17% of ranked | $1,800 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 27 contributions · 11% of ranked | $1,100 |
| 15 contributions · 7.2% of ranked | $750 |
| 2 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $450 |
| 6 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $150 |
| 6 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $150 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($310) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.