Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Founded in 2009 by Adam Green, a former MoveOn online organizer and Democratic party communications worker, and Stephanie Taylor, former MoveOn and SEIU organizer, the PCCC has been at the forefront fighting for progressive change ever since. (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00458000 · files quarterly
“The Progressive Change Campaign Committee is a million-member grassroots organization building power at the local, state, and federal levels. We advocate for economic populist priorities like expanding Social Security, debt-free college, Wall Street reform, and the public option. We’re the Elizabeth Warren wing of American politics!”
Progressive Change Campaign Committee, on its own site, boldprogressives.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
1 priority from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Summer Lee is a Pennsylvania state legislator and dedicated organizer, activist, and advocate for social justice.
Since taking office, Summer has been a voice for people across the district – championing initiatives that support sustainable jobs, environmental responsibility, police accountability, and gender and racial equity.
She is a tireless advocate for workers’ rights, union protections, and the fight for a liveable wage.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · boldprogressives.org/candidates
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 1 | $4 · 100% |
| All recipients | 1 | $4 |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | 1 | $4 |
Bars drawn to $4, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $12K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AFS PAC · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO · 1 payment |
The 4 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $2.4M from 4 sources in all.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,696 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $431.8K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 4 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports. Here they come to $32K, more than the $26.1K this committee's own reports show on the line.
Total reported receipts $4,211,558
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 702 contributions · 30% | $129,618 |
| 229 contributions · 15% | $64,293 |
| 171 contributions · 9.2% | $39,508 |
Total reported disbursements $4,273,430
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $3,450 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$4.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.4M, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Founded in 2009 by Adam Green, a former MoveOn online organizer and Democratic party communications worker, and Stephanie Taylor, former MoveOn and SEIU organizer, the PCCC has been at the forefront fighting for progressive change ever since. Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Progressive Change Campaign Committee is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
$32K from 4 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $4 |
$4 across 1 recipient committee, or <0.1% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 100 contributions · 5.9% | $25,652 |
| 24 contributions · 5% | $21,650 |
| 153 contributions · 4.6% | $19,713 |
| 30 contributions · 2.9% | $12,407 |
| 43 contributions · 2.9% | $12,350 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,560 contributions · 48% of ranked | $205,466 |
| Written instead of an employer · 352 contributions · 16% of ranked | $68,596 |
| 2 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 21 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $7,250 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.2% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $1,771 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,195,251) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,550 contributions · 45% of ranked | $194,576 |
| 25 contributions · 5% of ranked | $21,450 |
| 29 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $13,693 |
| 45 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $11,616 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 10 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $10,890 |
| 2 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $1,771 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,195,251) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $3,666,411
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,311 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
12 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $17,458 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 86 payments · 19% of all spending | $829,353 |
| 38 payments · 5.4% of all spending | $229,527 |
| 37 payments · 4.9% of all spending | $208,160 |
| 41 payments · 4.7% of all spending | $198,963 |
| 41 payments · 4.2% of all spending | $180,875 |
| 37 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $143,851 |
| 35 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $135,631 |
| 38 payments · 3% of all spending | $128,881 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.