Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00422519 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 138 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $87.6K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $127,186
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 135 contributions · 100% | $82,042 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 25 contributions · 37% of ranked | $26,487 |
| Written instead of an employer · 11 contributions · 21% of ranked | $15,560 |
| Written instead of an employer · 25 contributions · 13% of ranked | $9,355 |
| 4 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $2,750 |
Total reported disbursements $118,972
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
No itemized payments
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026
$119K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $35.2K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Late 12G report, 2014$660 assessed
Case 2920 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
New Trier Democratic Organization is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
| 4 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $2,550 |
| 4 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $1,650 |
| 2 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $1,500 |
| 3 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $1,500 |
A further $15,177 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($19,148) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 26 contributions · 36% of ranked | $27,187 |
| 1 contribution · 13% of ranked | $10,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 26 contributions · 13% of ranked | $9,955 |
| 17 contributions · 13% of ranked | $9,610 |
| 4 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $2,750 |
| 4 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $2,550 |
| 4 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $1,750 |
| 5 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $1,550 |
A further $12,077 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($19,148) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.