Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)CorporationMedina, OhioActive
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00402081 · files quarterly
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 3 | $15,000 | $0 | $15,000 | 75% |
| Other or unresolved | 1 | $5,000 | $0 | $5,000 | 25% |
| Shown support | 4 | $20,000 | $0 | $20,000 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Republican candidates | 3 | $15K · 60% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 1 | $5K · 20% |
| Other PACs and committees | 1 | $5K · 20% |
| All recipients | 5 | $25K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Alaska | 1 | $5K |
| Montana | 1 | $5K |
| Texas | 1 | $5K |
| Wyoming | 1 | $5K |
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to SULLIVAN VICTORY · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to DAINES SENATE MAJORITY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to 2025 SENATORS CLASSIC COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to HAGEMAN VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
$25K across 5 recipient committees, or 24% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 22 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $45.8K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $93,500
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7 contributions · 44% | $20,250 |
| 2 contributions · 12% | $5,500 |
| 1 contribution · 11% | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 6.6% | $3,000 |
| 3 contributions · 5.5% | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 5.5% | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 5.5% | $2,500 |
Total reported disbursements $104,000
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $25,000
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 5 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 4.8% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 4.8% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 4.8% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 4.8% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · 4.8% of all spending | $5,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
$104K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $27.5K, Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
RPM International Inc. Manufacturing in America PAC, DBA RPM Manufacturing in America PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
No pages quoted
No approved organization identity yet
| $2,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 contributions · 32% of ranked | $13,000 |
| 4 contributions · 23% of ranked | $9,250 |
| 1 contribution · 12% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 5 contributions · 11% of ranked | $4,500 |
| 1 contribution · 6.1% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 6.1% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked | $1,000 |
A further $5,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 contributions · 28% of ranked | $13,000 |
| 3 contributions · 19% of ranked | $8,500 |
| 1 contribution · 11% of ranked | $5,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 11% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 5.5% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 5.5% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 3.3% of ranked | $1,500 |
| 1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked | $1,000 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.