Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Trade associationAustin, TexasActive
Connected organization: National Association of Realtors PAC
FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00363986 · files quarterly
“The mission of the Texas REALTORS® Political Action Committee (TREPAC) is to raise and disburse funds to promote homeownership, protect real property rights, and increase political awareness.”
Texas Association of Realtors Federal PAC-FEDPAC, on its own site, trepac.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
2 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
The mission of Texas REALTORS® Political Action Committee (TREPAC) is to raise and disburse funds to promote home ownership, protect real property rights, and increase political awareness.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · trepac.com/front
Heading as listed on trepac.com/front ↗ (opens trepac.com/front at this heading)
Estimated average savings from historic property tax reforms passed in 2023
Dispute resolution cost and time saved by clarifying property owners’ rights in state law
Eliminated costly court proceedings by allowing discriminatory covenants to be removed by property owner request
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · trepac.com/smart-investment-campaign
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
Late MY report, 2001$3.2K assessed
Case 514 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Texas Association of Realtors Federal PAC-FEDPAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names National Association of Realtors PAC as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Texas Association of Realtors Federal PAC-FEDPAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS · 3 payments | $525 |
$525 from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS · 2 payments | $1.4M |
$1.4M across 1 recipient committee, or 98% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,766 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $226.3K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $1,401,967
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,765 contributions · 99.9% | $226,199 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% | $112 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 44 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $4,595 |
| 24 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $4,089 |
| 10 contributions · 2% of ranked | $3,648 |
| 35 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $3,514 |
| 11 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $3,250 |
| 20 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $3,128 |
| 30 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $2,992 |
| 41 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $2,793 |
A further $3,996 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,014,804) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,033 contributions · 54% of ranked | $119,443 |
| 497 contributions · 29% of ranked | $65,165 |
| 4 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $2,820 |
| 9 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $2,544 |
| 24 contributions · 1% of ranked | $2,237 |
| 18 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $1,884 |
| 4 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $1,360 |
| 7 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $1,160 |
A further $3,996 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,014,804) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total reported disbursements $1,475,715
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $1,456,632
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 27 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 98% of all spending | $1,444,705 |
| 2 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $5,761 |
| 20 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $3,634 |
| 2 payments · 0.1% of all spending | $1,640 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $893 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
$1.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $737.8K, Jan 1 – Jun 30, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.