FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00331173 · files monthly
SummaryAt a glance
Why it exists
No statement of purpose found on its site.
Money
$54K raised, $46.2K spent, $17.8K cash on hand (through Oct 14, 2026). Where it comes from
Who funds it
74% from donors giving over $200 · 19% from PACs and other committees · largest donor Debra Phillips, $10K. See who funds it
Where it goes
$46K given to candidates and committees, the largest to Robert E. Latta ($3.5K) · 58% of its support to Republicans, 21% to candidates of other or unresolved parties. See where it goes
Lobbying
National Electrical Manufacturers Association lobbied on 8 issues. See lobbying
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
No published list of positions
This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$38K to 24 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $38,000
Republican 58%
Other or unresolved 21%
Democratic 21%
Support by the party of the candidate
Party of the candidate
Candidates
Direct
Independent
Amount
Share
Republican
13
$22,000
$0
$22,000
58%
Other or unresolved
4
$8,000
$0
$8,000
21%
Democratic
7
$8,000
$0
$8,000
21%
Shown support
24
$38,000
$0
$38,000
100%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$46,000 in 39 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
7
$8K · 17%
Republican candidates
13
$22K · 46%
Other or unresolved candidates
4
$8K · 17%
Other PACs and committees
6
$9.5K · 20%
All recipients
30
$47.5K
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
Ohio
2
$6.5K
New Mexico
1
$3.5K
North Carolina
2
$3.5K
Kentucky
1
$2.5K
Georgia
1
$2.5K
Virginia
1
$2K
Florida
1
$2K
Texas
2
$2K
The largest 8 of 20 states.
Recipients 30
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Martin Heinrich2 receipts, latest Apr 15, 2026Martin Heinrich for Senate · S2NM00088$3.5K
Robert Edward Latta4 receipts, latest Aug 11, 2026Latta for Congress · H8OH05036$3.5K
William Troy Balderson1 receipt, latest Aug 6, 2025Balderson for Congress · H8OH12180$3K
S. Brett Brett Guthrie1 receipt, latest Jan 21, 2025Guthrie for Congress · H8KY02031$2.5K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
Where the money came from $53,984 reported receipts
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$40,08874%
Largest donors
Debra Phillips2 contributions, latest Mar 11, 2026 · PRESIDENT & CEO · NEMA · BURKE, VA$10,000
Spencer Pederson32 contributions, latest Jun 15, 2026 · VP, PUBLIC AFFAIRS · NEMA · CHEVY CHASE, MD$6,144
Donald Leavens2 contributions, latest Mar 4, 2026 · VP · NEMA · MCLEAN, VA$5,000
Michael Pfeiffer36 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · CFO · NEMA · GAITHERSBURG, MD$2,700
Brian Papp2 contributions, latest Mar 23, 2026 · MANAGING DIRECTOR · NEMA · WASHINGTON, DC$2,500
Peter Ferrell28 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT RELATIONS · NEMA · ALEXANDRIA, VA$1,480
Hae Choe2 contributions, latest Mar 9, 2026 · MANAGING DIRECTOR · NEMA · VIENNA, VA$1,250
Patrick Hughes30 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · SR. VP · NEMA · GREAT FALLS, VA$1,200
Todd Sims30 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · DIRECTOR, GOVERNMENT RELATIONS · NEMA · WASHINGTON, DC$1,200
Sean Sullivan30 contributions, latest Aug 31, 2026 · CHIEF HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICER · NEMA · BROADLANDS, VA$1,200
Alexa Burr2 contributions, latest Mar 15, 2026 · VP STRATEGIC GROWTH · NEMA · WASHINGTON, DC$1,000
Jeannie SaloOne contribution on Mar 18, 2025 · CHIEF PUBLIC POLICY OFFICER · SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC · ALEXANDRIA, VA$1,000
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 271 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $40.1K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$10,00019%
The 2 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$3,8597.1%
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$37<0.1%
Total reported receipts $53,984
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $40,087 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $953
$953+
$3.8K+
$8.6K+
$15.2K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
Virginia145 contributions · 59%
$23,822
Maryland68 contributions · 22%
$8,844
District of Columbia55 contributions · 14%
$5,671
North Carolina1 contribution · 2.5%
$1,000
Illinois1 contribution · 1.2%
$500
Minnesota1 contribution · 0.6%
$250
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $46,174 reported
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$46,00099.6%
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$1740.4%
Total reported disbursements $46,174
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $46,000 itemized
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$46,000100%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$46,000
Paid to
Latta for Congress$3,500
Martin Heinrich for Senate$3,500
Balderson for Congress$3,000
Sock IT to 'EM PAC$2,500
Guthrie for Congress$2,500
Rick W. Allen for Congress$2,500
Total itemized disbursements $46,000
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 39 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
$48.5K spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $5.5K, July 2025.
$48.5K
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
What National Electrical Manufacturers Association lobbies on 2026 reports
Besides giving through its PAC, National Electrical Manufacturers Association pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$1.9M
Quarterly reports read
18
Bills it named
22
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Energy/Nuclearin 12 report entries · 7 bills named
In its own words
Energy policy and infrastructure issues affecting the electrical manufacturing industry, including Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) reform; critical minerals programs; domestic and international energy-related supply chains; transformer production and supply chain resilience;
DOE energy efficiency programs, including building efficiency initiatives and the LIT Act; permitting reform; improvements to federal contracting related to energy efficiency programs; and broader national energy strategy.
Advocacy also included legislation related to grid modernization, transmission capacity, consumer appliance standards, and energy infrastructure, including the SECURE Grid Act (H.R. 7257), High-Capacity Grid Act (H.R. 6633), including Section 2 relating to best-available transmission conductor standards, the Don't Mess with My Home Appliances Act (H.R. 4626), the SPEED Act (H.R. 4774), and the REWIRE Act (S. 3947), including Section 2 (Definitions).
Legislative and regulatory advocacy on energy policy issues, including H.R. 4626 (Dont Mess with My Appliances Act), H.R. 4774 (SPEED Act), H.R. 7257 / S. 4166 (Securing Community Upgrades for a Resilient Grid Act), S. 3947 (REWIRE Act), grid‑related executive actions, and permitting reform.
Advocacy also addressed a range of energy issues, including reform of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), Department of Energy (DOE) energy efficiency programs (including building efficiency programs and the LIT Act), transformers production and supply‑chain constraints, critical minerals programs, domestic and international energy supply chains, contracting reform related to energy efficiency legislation, and national energy strategy.
DHS implementation of the UFLPA; permitting reform legislation;
Energy Policy and Conservation Act reform; critical minerals programs and domestic and international energy supply chains; transformer production and supply chain issues;
Department of Energy energy efficiency programs, including building efficiency; opposition to the LIT Act; tariffs;
NEMAs Make It American initiative; energy-efficiency contracting improvements; and national energy strategy.
Electrification policy; energy efficiency; grid and cyber security; transmissions; permitting reform; HR. 6633 High Capacity Grid Act alongside REWIRE Act
S. 5653, Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026, Issues related to grid and energy infrastructure, permitting reform
Electrification policy; energy efficiency; grid and cyber security; transmissions; permitting reform; S. 3947 REWIRE Act
Taxation/Internal Revenue Codein 12 report entries · 4 bills named
In its own words
Tax policy issues affecting the electrical manufacturing industry, including implementation of the Prohibited Foreign Entity (PFE) provisions under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA); expansion of the Section 45X Advanced Manufacturing Production Tax Credit to additional electrical products, including transformers, switchgear, and copper-related components; tax incentives to support domestic critical mineral and magnet production; tax policies promoting energy efficiency through the deployment of NEMA member products; the CIRCUIT Act (S. 448/H.R. 4128); the COPPER Act (H.R. 8277); and tax provisions considered as part of budget reconciliation legislation.
Advocacy focused on strengthening domestic manufacturing, supply chain resilience, energy security, and investment in U.S. production and infrastructure.
S. 448/H.R. 4128, CIRCUIT Act, regarding expansion of the Section 45X Advanced Manufacturing Production Tax Credit to transformers, switchgear, copper, and other electrical products; implementation of Prohibited Foreign Entity (PFE) rules under the OBBBA; tax incentives for domestic critical mineral and magnet production; and tax policies supporting energy efficiency through deployment of NEMA member products.
Legislative advocacy regarding S. 448 / H.R. 4128 (CIRCUIT Act) and related tax policy issues affecting NEMA members, including implementation of the Prohibited Foreign Entity (PFE) provisions under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) and proposed expansions of the Section 45X advanced manufacturing production tax credit.
Trade (domestic/foreign)in 11 report entries
In its own words
Trade, tariff, and North American manufacturing policy issues affecting the electrical manufacturing industry, including Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs, implementation and enforcement of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), and measures affecting key manufacturing inputs and supply chains.
Advocacy also focused on NEMA proposals to use tariff and trade policy to strengthen domestic manufacturing, support energy infrastructure development, enhance supply chain resilience, and advance U.S. energy and industrial policy objectives.
Advocacy regarding Section 232 tariffs, including measures affecting steel, aluminum, semiconductors, and critical minerals, as well as actions related to reciprocal tariffs.
Activities also included advancing NEMAs tariff‑based incentive proposal to support domestic manufacturing and energy priorities.
Section 232 tariffs, including measures affecting steel, aluminum, semiconductors, and critical minerals, as well as actions related to reciprocal tariffs; advanced NEMA's tariff incentive proposal to accelerate energy and domestic manufacturing priorities.
General issues related to radiopharmaceutical tariffs.
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Budget/Appropriationsin 9 report entries · 2 bills named
In its own words
Appropriations and policy matters affecting the electrical manufacturing industry, including support for the ENERGY STAR program at the Department of Energy (DOE) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); investment in critical grid infrastructure and electrical equipment through DOE programs; and congressional and agency recognition of NEMAs "Make It American" initiative.
Activities included advocacy regarding funding levels for DOE and EPA programs relevant to NEMA members, related report language, and legislation including the CIRCUIT Act (S. 448/H.R. 4128).
S. 448/H.R. 4128, the CIRCUIT Act, regarding tax incentives for critical grid equipment;
FY appropriations affecting Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Agency programs relevant to NEMA members, including ENERGY STAR; federal investment in critical grid equipment through the Department of Energy; and congressional and agency recognition of NEMAs Make It American program.
Advocacy included funding requests and appropriations report language supporting NEMA priorities.
FY 2027 appropriations advocacy, including General Departmental Office (GDO) funding requests and related appropriations matters at the Department of Energy (DOE) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), with a particular focus on the ENERGY STAR program.
Health Issuesin 6 report entries
In its own words
Medicare reimbursement and healthcare payment policy issues affecting medical imaging and radiopharmaceutical technologies, including Average Sales Price (ASP) reporting requirements for radiopharmaceuticals under Medicare Part B.
Medicare Average Sales Price (ASP) for radiopharmaceuticals; Part 212 regulations applicable to radiopharmaceutical manufacturers; and Section 232 pharmaceutical tariffs as applied to radiopharmaceuticals.
CMS-1850-P, CY 2027 Hospital Outpatient and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems Proposed Rule, regarding Medicare reimbursement and separate payment for diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals.
General issues related to radiopharmaceuticals.
Offices it contacted
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
SENATE
Food & Drug Administration (FDA)
Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplacein 5 report entries · 1 bill named
In its own words
Energy workforce development and veterans employment policy, including the Veterans Energy Transition Act (H.R. 4105).
H.R. 4105, VET Act of 2025, assisting with veteran transition to private sector employment
Surface transportation and infrastructure policy affecting the electrical manufacturing industry, including the reauthorization of federal surface transportation programs; support for continued funding of the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Program; recognition of private-sector Buy America, Build America (BABA) compliance and certification resources, including NEMA's "Make It American" program; and legislation supporting domestic manufacturing and infrastructure investment, including the BUILD America 250 Act (H.R. 8807).
Advocacy focused on policies to strengthen domestic manufacturing, supply chain resilience, transportation infrastructure investment, and deployment of electrical and transportation technologies.
Surface transportation reauthorization; support for private-sector BABA certification tools; and continued NEVI program funding.
Issues related to Buy America; Surface Transportation Reauthorization
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
National Electrical Manufacturers AssociationIts own staff · 3 reports$1.9M
Ridgeline Advocacy Group LLCLobbying firm · 3 reports$270K
Boundary Stone PartnersLobbying firm · 3 reports$170K
Ferox StrategiesLobbying firm · 3 reports$150K
S-3 GroupLobbying firm · 3 reports$150K
LOT Sixteen LLCLobbying firm · 3 reports$90K
Contributions on the LD-203 report
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $9K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Rick Larsen$4K
Cindy Hyde-Smith$1K
Jake Levine$1K
Mike Rounds$1K
Alex Padilla$500
David Rouzer$500
DCCC$500
Hector De La Torre$500
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION”, found by searching “NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 26, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE ('NEMA PAC')
Filings covered
Through Oct 14, 2026
Data source
FEC bulk filing data
National Electrical Manufacturers Association PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names National Electrical Manufacturers Association as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Pages quoted 0 pages
No pages quoted
Nothing from this committee’s or its sponsor’s site is quoted yet.
Linked public records
No approved organization identity yet
The official FEC committee record remains available under Filings.
BGBrett GuthrieRepublican · U.S. House · KY-02 · via Guthrie For Congress1 payment, latest Jan 21, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, Jan 21, 2025$2.5K
RARick W. AllenRepublican · U.S. House · GA-12 · via Rick W. Allen For Congress1 payment, latest May 7, 2025 · CONTRIBUTION · FEC filing, May 7, 2025$2.5K
$47.5K across 32 recipient committees, or 103% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
These edges sum past the total disbursements this committee reports for the cycle, which means some rows are amended filings restating earlier activity. Treat the ranking as sound and the total as unreconciled.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Nema268 contributions · 94% of ranked
$37,587
Reinhausen Manufacturing INC1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked
$1,000
Schneider Electric1 contribution · 2.5% of ranked
$1,000
S&C Electric Company1 contribution · 1.2% of ranked
$500
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,859) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
President & CEO2 contributions · 25% of ranked
$10,000
VP Public Affairs32 contributions · 15% of ranked
$6,144
VP2 contributions · 12% of ranked
$5,000
Managing Director23 contributions · 11% of ranked
$4,510
Director Government Relations63 contributions · 7.2% of ranked
$2,880
CFO38 contributions · 7.1% of ranked
$2,850
Chief Human Resources Officer32 contributions · 3.2% of ranked
$1,280
SR VP32 contributions · 3.2% of ranked
$1,280
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,859) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Issues related to energy and manufacturing tax policy including 45X, 48C, 179D, 30C, 25C, 25D, 45L; S.448, H.R. 4128, CIRCUIT Act
S. 448/H.R. 4128 (CIRCUIT Act), and future opportunities (Recon 3.0), focusing on expansion of the 45X tax credit
S. 448/H.R. 4128 (CIRCUIT Act), and H.R. 1 (One Big Beautiful Bill), focusing on expansion of the 45X tax credit
Advocacy also addressed investment in critical grid equipment at DOE and congressional and agency recognition of NEMAs "Make It American" program, including supporting report language advancing NEMA member interests.