Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACTrade associationSacramento, CaliforniaActive
Connected organization: California Association of Realtors
Political fund of California Association of Realtors
professional organization (Linked public record: Wikidata organization record)
FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00083279 · files quarterly
“The CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® is a statewide trade association dedicated to the advancement of professionalism in real estate. The Association develops and promotes programs and services that will enhance the members' freedom and ability to conduct their individual businesses successfully with integrity and competency and, through collective action, promotes the preservation of real property rights.
In an effort to alleviate perceptions of misconduct in the real estate industry, a group of approximately 70 real estate agents founded the California State Realty Federation in Los Angeles on May 27, 1905. In October 1920, the name was changed to California Real Estate Association and, in January 1975, it was changed to the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®.”
California Association of Realtors, the organization this committee is the political fund of, car.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
4 priorities from the site of California Association of Realtors, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
SB 42 (Umberg), Political Reform Act of 1974: Public Campaign Financing: California Fair Elections Act of 2026
This measure would permit, but not require, public funding of political campaigns in California.
Currently state law prohibits it.
If this measure passes, candidates who chose to take public money would have to accept spending limits, and the money could not be used for legal fees, fines, or paying back personal loans to a campaign.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · car.org/advocacy/legislation/stategovernmentaffairs/Ballot-Measures
Creates Loan Program for Middle-Income Buyers of Qualified New Homes.
This ballot proposition would create a $25 billion loan program to help middle-income Californians buy a newly built home.
Qualified buyers could borrow up to 17 percent of the purchase price at a fixed rate.
Buyers must live in the home, have lived in California for at least a year, earn under 200 percent of area median income, and put down at least 3 percent.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · car.org/advocacy/legislation/stategovernmentaffairs/Ballot-Measures
Imposes One-Time Tax on Certain Individuals and Trusts.
The so-called “billionaire tax” would impose a one-time tax of up to 5 percent on Californians and trusts holding more than $1 billion in assets such as businesses, stocks, art, and intellectual property.
Most of the revenue would go to health care.
The Legislative Analyst projects an ongoing loss of hundreds of millions of dollars a year in state income tax revenue.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · car.org/advocacy/legislation/stategovernmentaffairs/Ballot-Measures
Modifies Environmental Review for Certain Projects.
This measure would implement reform to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by speeding up environmental review under CEQA for most housing, transportation, water, health, and clean energy projects.
It puts agencies on deadlines, trims the requirement to study endless project alternatives, and limits how long opponents have to sue and what a court can order.
C.A.R.’s BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING MEASURES AT ITS OCTOBER BUSINESS MEETINGS:
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · car.org/advocacy/legislation/stategovernmentaffairs/Ballot-Measures
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Other PACs and committees | 2 | $15K · 100% |
| All recipients | 2 | $15K |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $10K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS · 39 payments | $26.7K |
$26.7K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS · 1 payment | $1.3M |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,266 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $689.1K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 3 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $226.3K from 3 sources in all.
Total reported receipts $2,310,156
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,258 contributions · 99.8% | $687,385 |
| 2 contributions · <0.1% | $590 |
| 1 contribution · <0.1% | $402 |
| 2 contributions · <0.1% | $367 |
| 3 contributions · <0.1% | $315 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
Total reported disbursements $5,292,011
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
$5.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $2.5M, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
professional organization Linked public record: Wikidata organization record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
California Real Estate PAC/federal - California Association of Realtors is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment |
| $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
$1.3M across 3 recipient committees, or 24% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $31,699 |
| 73 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $23,125 |
| 42 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $15,401 |
| 11 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $10,118 |
| 36 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $9,444 |
| 52 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $9,359 |
| 5 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $8,222 |
| 14 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $7,950 |
A further $1,994 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,346,907) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,147 contributions · 94% of ranked | $646,826 |
| 43 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $16,953 |
| 35 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $7,511 |
| 7 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $3,852 |
| 8 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $2,913 |
| 5 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $1,557 |
| 2 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $1,440 |
| 1 contribution · 0.2% of ranked | $1,370 |
A further $1,994 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,346,907) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,809,246
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 78 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 24% of all spending | $1,256,463 |
| 25 payments · 7.9% of all spending | $417,171 |
| 2 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $70,721 |
| 2 payments · 0.6% of all spending | $32,313 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $7,938 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 5 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $2,620 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.