Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00074450 · files monthly
“LET'S MAKE SURE WE ELECT REPRESENTATIVES FIGHTING FOR WISCONSIN AT EVERY LEVEL”
Republican Party of Wisconsin, on its own site, wisgop.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
1 priority from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
The Republican Party of Wisconsin stands with a firm allegiance with the principles that make America exceptional.
The Republican Party must reaffirm the timeless truths that have made this country exceptional in the past and will do so in the future.
We expect our elected officials to uphold these truths through acknowledgment and action.
We stand for a strong national defense.
We believe that God endows every person with the right to life, to liberty, and to the pursuit of happiness and that He requires us all to respect the rights of all of our fellow citizens, from the moment that they are conceived to their deaths.
We hold this nation in trust.
We honor the sanctity of the individual, not the state.
We support the Electoral College that balances the rights of densely populated regions with those less populated.
We stand for liberty, not the tyranny of the mob or the orders of the administrative state.
We believe that it is not too late to return to a republic where the law is written by Congress which itself is limited by Constitutional law, where judges are limited by the written language of the law, where the president is limited to enforcing the law as written, and where the power of our federal government is limited to areas clearly defined by the Constitution.
We stand for property rights and economic freedom.
We stand for a level playing field, free from the cronyism of subsidies, mandates, and monopolies.
We stand for medical freedom and defend an individual’s right to make their decisions without coercion.
We stand for decentralization and free-market solutions to the serious problems in areas such as health care and education that have become so distorted by political manipulation.
Neither liberty nor justice is possible without public order.
We believe that justice must be blind to race, gender, status, political affiliation, and sexual orientation, and that law enforcement must treat everyone equally.
We stand for the same due process and the same presumption of innocence for all.
We call for the federal government to balance its budget and insist that each state continues to do likewise.
We oppose “bailouts” that enable State irresponsibility.
We stand for equal treatment through the law and for equal opportunity that equal treatment brings.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · wisgop.org/platform
Heading as listed on wisgop.org/platform ↗ (opens wisgop.org/platform at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 6 payments | $370.5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 12 payments | $367.6K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 9 payments | $246.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 6 payments | $147.8K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $48.7K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 5 payments | $48.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 4 payments | $18K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to CORNYN VICTORY COMMITTEE · 3 payments | $15K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment |
$1.3M from 21 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 6 payments | $146.3K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 1 payment | $48.7K |
$195K across 2 recipient committees, or 3.6% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,771 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $793.2K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 6 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $6,960,448
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,481 contributions · 89% | $707,030 |
| 25 contributions · 2.2% | $17,651 |
| 39 contributions · 1.9% | $14,948 |
| 36 contributions · 1.7% | $13,197 |
Total reported disbursements $5,430,850
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$5.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $926K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
1976 cycleReport released Mar 31, 1980
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Republican Party of Wisconsin is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Its FEC record names Grow the Majority as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Republican Party of Wisconsin is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to SCALISE LEADERSHIP FUND · 1 payment | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| 55 contributions · 1% |
| $8,215 |
| 12 contributions · 0.6% | $4,375 |
| 8 contributions · 0.4% | $3,272 |
| 14 contributions · 0.4% | $3,250 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,221 contributions · 51% of ranked | $402,382 |
| Written instead of an employer · 131 contributions · 12% of ranked | $98,156 |
| 4 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $4,055 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($788,987) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,225 contributions · 51% of ranked | $403,287 |
| 11 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $40,075 |
| 41 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $33,116 |
| 17 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $33,020 |
| 23 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $25,955 |
| 15 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $21,901 |
| 2 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 27 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $19,112 |
A further $4,055 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($788,987) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,443,717
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 440 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
2 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $34,572 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 36 payments · 6.5% of all spending | $352,155 |
| 11 payments · 5% of all spending | $269,088 |
| 6 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $146,321 |
| 11 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $140,992 |
| 19 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $100,641 |
| 5 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $92,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.9% of all spending | $48,715 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $35,876 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.