Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Party committee (qualified) › 2025–2026
Party committee (qualified)Nashville, TennesseeActive
Connected organization: Trump Victory
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00040220 · files monthly
3 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
All Bill of Rights freedoms are absolute and inviolate.
We must protect and guarantee our right to keep and bear arms, freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of expression, and the freedom of assembly.
We must maintain a strong military defense for the protection of our citizens, our borders, our national interests, and our principles.
We must honor those who have served in our armed forces and deserve the full care and benefits they were promised.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tngop.org/tngop-guiding-principles
Tennessee is highly ranked in the nation for election integrity.
Voting by all legal U.S. citizens should be protected and every effort made to assure one person-one vote.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tngop.org/tngop-guiding-principles
Our nation's economic policies should promote the production of goods and services made in America by American citizens, including self-sufficiency in food, medicine, energy, communication and defense with emphasis on free-market principles and solutions, without government price controls.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tngop.org/tngop-guiding-principles
We support Tennessee's commitment to a balanced budget, the constitutional prohibition of a state income tax, minimal taxation and strong fiscal reserves.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tngop.org/tngop-guiding-principles
We assert the sanctity of human life from conception to natural death, and we affirm that the unborn child has a fundamental right to life, which cannot be infringed.
Individuals have the freedom to choose or deny medical treatments or procedures.
We believe in the traditional family, based on the foundation of marriage between one man and one woman.
God's created order is two biological sexes, male and female.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tngop.org/tngop-guiding-principles
We believe that education is the bedrock of freedom and gateway to opportunity, we encourage K-12 schools to prepare students to be productive citizens, ready for tomorrow's workplace and for any college or technical training they choose.
American exceptionalism, the gift of our founding fathers through the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, should be woven through the curricula and instruction in our public schools.
English is our official language and complete mastery must be the goal of our public schools.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tngop.org/tngop-guiding-principles
Laws are created by our state and federal legislators.
Bureaucrats should implement laws, not interpret or create them.
The rule of law should be applied and enforced equally to neither target nor exempt individuals or groups.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tngop.org/tngop-guiding-principles
We believe that with freedom comes responsibility; we believe that individuals are responsible for their own actions and decisions and must strive to act consistently ethical in all areas of life.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tngop.org/tngop-guiding-principles
statewide political parties nominate candidates exclusively through state-run primary
elections for all partisan offices, removing the right of parties to use conventions or other
methods preferred by local members;
WHEREAS, The Tennessee Republican Party has a longstanding tradition of allowing
county parties in all 95 counties to determine their own nomination processes, respecting
local control, grassroots decision-making, and regional diversity;
WHEREAS, SB 799/HB 855 includes an arbitrary and discriminatory grandfather
legislation represents a betrayal of that trust;
members of the Tennessee General Assembly.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tngop.org/resolutions
Heading as listed on tngop.org/resolutions ↗ (opens tngop.org/resolutions at this heading)
WHEREAS, Recent inappropriate and possibly unlawful
partisan judicial activism by certain federal district judges
appears intended to again sabotage the Trump and
President Trump’s plan to deport illegal aliens from the
United States, including various drug cartel terrorists;
WHEREAS, Such judicial activists appear to be using a
‘run-out-the clock’ strategy against the Trump
Administration so as to waste precious time in removing
those dangerous narco-terrorist elements from the United
WHEREAS, Partisan judicial activism now appears to be
an ongoing Democrat-political strategy to damage the
Trump Administration by sabotaging the nation’s
economy by creating civil unrest, including criminal acts
such as those recently seen in Democrat so-called “Tesla
Protests” against Tesla owners, dealers and factory
WHEREAS, Judicial activism is now routinely used
and/or facilitated by Democrats, and includes judicial
activism to arbitrarily, and without regarding to merit or
necessity, preserve the jobs, power and seats of authority
amongst an overwhelming number of federal bureaucrats;
numbers that are by one DOGE estimate, around ninety-
two percent of the federal workforce in D.C.;
WHEREAS, This enormous bureaucratic behemoth
is currently protected by union and civil service rules
that make its members believe themselves to be a
permanent ruling class that cannot be disciplined or
dismissed from federal employment no matter how
incompetent or how merit-less or egregious their
WHEREAS, This self-serving, so-called permanent
bureaucratic ruling class considers itself
unanswerable to the U.S. Congress and the
Executive Branch, and continues to expand its ranks
in a malignant fashion that is contrary to the best
interests of the United States of America and is
counter to the desires of the overwhelming majority
of American Voters who re-elected President Donald
WHEREAS, Recent DOGE investigations have
revealed an incredible level of bureaucratic fraud,
waste, abuse and outright theft of taxpayer funds at
such a level that it threatens to ultimately collapse
our federal government and all its social programs,
including Medicare and Social Security;
WHEREAS, Judicial activism by certain District
Judges appears intended to retain and protect a
criminal element of narco-terrorists within America’s
borders because the Far-Left contingent of the
Democrat Party favors and engages with such
elements for the purpose of promoting
political terrorism and civil unrest so as to force
Americans to accept their unworthy and meritless
social and cultural objectives and to advance a
contingent of the Democrat Party and to further its
political objectives at all costs;
WHEREAS, Respected historical and constitutional
authorities that include former House Speaker Newt
White House Legal Counsel, Stephen Miller;
advocate historically and constitutionally valid
remedies such as de-funding rogue, partisan judicial
activists while also considering other constitutionally
valid methods of limiting the authority of such rogue
WHEREAS, we agree that such partisan political activism
by certain District Federal Judges indeed now threatens
our entire Judicial System as well America’s safety and
economic well-being, and that it obstructs America’s right
to a federal government that is both economically
efficient and effective, as well as a federal government
that is transparent and honest with its citizens; and that
such partisan political judicial activists should be
constitutionally limited in terms of authority and scope;
WHEREAS, the legal scope of a Federal District
Judge is intended to be limited to the district in which
that Judge serves, and that such a judge’s rulings
should not impact and/or subject to judicial tyranny,
during their Executive Committee meeting on Saturday,
April 12, 2025, in Mt. Juliet, Tennessee now call on the
Committee in asking the U.S. Congress to consider all
constitutionally valid remedies, including those cited
here-in, to limit the authority and/or scope of rogue,
politically partisan District Federal Judges whose actual
intent is not to uphold the law, but is instead intended to
sabotage the Executive Branch and the Trump
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tngop.org/resolutions
Heading as listed on tngop.org/resolutions ↗ (opens tngop.org/resolutions at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2006 cycleReport released Feb 22, 2011
2002 cycleReport released Nov 9, 2004
No lobbying disclosures matched
Tennessee Republican Party Federal Election Account is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a party committee (qualified). Its FEC record names Trump Victory as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Tennessee Republican Party Federal Election Account is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 10 payments | $428K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 6 payments | $155.7K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to TEAM HAGERTY VICTORY · 2 payments | $145.3K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $140K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $45K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $21.8K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to FRIENDS OF BURCHETT · 3 payments | $13K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM VAN EPPS · 2 payments | $7.5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DIANA VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $3K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.8K |
$982.1K from 16 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 7 payments | $154K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 1 payment | $21.8K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $6.6K |
| Senate campaign committee · 2 payments | $5K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to TEAM ESTES · 1 payment | $2K |
| 5 payments | $1.8K |
$191.2K across 6 recipient committees, or 7.4% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 975 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $927.4K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 8 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $2,850,408
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 938 contributions · 94% | $869,433 |
| 9 contributions · 2.7% | $25,100 |
| 5 contributions · 0.7% | $6,300 |
| 2 contributions · 0.6% | $5,600 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% | $5,000 |
| 7 contributions · 0.4% | $3,900 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% | $2,500 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 402 contributions · 26% of ranked | $223,329 |
| Written instead of an employer · 81 contributions · 14% of ranked | $125,050 |
| 14 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $31,375 |
| Written instead of an employer · 30 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $28,965 |
| 3 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $20,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $12,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $10,500 |
A further $39,215 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($344,175) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total reported disbursements $2,577,836
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $2,127,372
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 528 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
42 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $71,909 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10 payments · 21% of all spending | $535,791 |
| 42 payments · 7.9% of all spending | $202,426 |
| 3 payments · 6.7% of all spending | $172,418 |
| 3 payments · 6.4% of all spending | $164,911 |
| 32 payments · 6.1% of all spending | $158,443 |
| 7 payments · 6% of all spending | $154,000 |
| 22 payments · 3.8% of all spending | $97,095 |
| 45 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $82,423 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
$2.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $507.3K, November 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
2002 cycleReport released Nov 9, 2004
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 406 contributions · 25% of ranked | $222,839 |
| 15 contributions · 6.3% of ranked | $56,950 |
| 13 contributions · 6.1% of ranked | $55,650 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 34 contributions · 5.4% of ranked | $49,365 |
| 21 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $35,800 |
| 7 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $30,800 |
| 47 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $28,925 |
| 15 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $22,420 |
A further $19,215 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($344,175) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.