Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › UT-04 race › 2025–2026
I Independent nominee for U.S. House, UT-04
Has not served in Congress
No campaign site or public profiles are attached to this record yet.
Steven Burt’s words are not shown
FEC filings, Oct 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00922898
96¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 5 reports ($38K of $39.7K). Cash on hand went from $6.9K on Dec 31, 2025 to $1.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $19,549 | $12,619 | $6,931 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $7,355 | $11,767 | $2,519 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $7,170 | $7,613 | $2,075 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $4,920 | $4,630 | $2,365 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $750 | $1,333 | $1,782 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 39 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $31.3K.
Total reported receipts $39,744
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
88% of the money placed by state came from inside Utah: $27.5K of $31.3K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 32 contributions · 88% | $27,489 |
| 1 contribution · 3.2% | $1,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.2% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.2% | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1% | $324 |
| 1 contribution · 0.8% |
No outside spending filed
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6 payments · 36% of all spending | $13,821 |
| 2 payments · 15% of all spending | $5,639 |
| 9 payments · 7.7% of all spending | $2,923 |
| 18 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $1,358 |
| 2 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $914 |
| 36 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $913 |
| 37 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $908 |
| 2 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $600 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Not read yet
Lost · 5,626 votes (2.1%) · 4 of 4 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · Lighthouse Research, Sep 17, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
| $250 |
| 1 contribution · 0.8% | $250 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 7 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 6 contributions · 21% of ranked | $6,450 |
| 2 contributions · 18% of ranked | $5,639 |
| 1 contribution · 11% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 2 contributions · 11% of ranked | $3,500 |
| 5 contributions · 7.5% of ranked | $2,350 |
| 2 contributions · 4% of ranked | $1,250 |
| 1 contribution · 3.2% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.2% of ranked | $1,000 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,361) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9 contributions · 24% of ranked | $7,400 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 6 contributions · 21% of ranked | $6,450 |
| 2 contributions · 18% of ranked | $5,639 |
| 1 contribution · 9.6% of ranked | $3,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4% of ranked | $1,250 |
| 1 contribution · 3.2% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.2% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.2% of ranked | $1,000 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,361) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $29,980
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 131 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
2 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $5,639 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.