Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › TX-17 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, TX-17
Has not served in Congress
4 priorities from caseyshepardforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
- Protect the separation of powers by making sure Congress can fully check the actions of the executive branch.
- Defend the rule of law by supporting a strong and independent judicial branch that can review executive decisions.
- Improve leadership across federal agencies through careful vetting of executive appointments and holding department heads accountable when they fail to do their jobs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · caseyshepardforcongress.com/caseys-vision
- Protect and expand food programs so every person has access to the basic right to food.
- Strengthen support for families by fully funding SNAP and school breakfast and lunch programs.
- Rebuild global food stability by restoring the USAID Food Program and ending tariffs that raise food prices.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · caseyshepardforcongress.com/caseys-vision
- Improve access to care by strengthening medical funding so every American can get help when they are sick or injured.
- Restore support for Medicaid and Medicare to ensure seniors, families, and people with disabilities receive the care they need.
- Grow and support the health‑care workforce by recognizing nurse practitioners and other providers as professionals eligible for federal student aid, and by updating immigration policy so more trained medical workers can legally serve our communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · caseyshepardforcongress.com/caseys-vision
- Encourage new housing development by offering tax incentives that make it easier to build affordable homes.
- Support low‑income families by fully funding rental assistance programs so more people can keep stable housing.
- Lower construction costs and grow the workforce by ending tariffs that raise material prices and updating immigration policy so trained foreign construction workers can legally help build more homes.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · caseyshepardforcongress.com/caseys-vision
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00934547
12¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 6 reports ($11K of $93.5K). Cash on hand went from $4.1K on Feb 11, 2026 to $78.2K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 11, 2026 | $5,707 | $1,631 | $4,076 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $307 | $3,989 | $394 |
| PRE-RUN-OFF 2026 through May 6, 2026 | $1,990 | $0 | $2,384 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $797 | $36 | $3,145 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $6,293 | $2,734 | $6,704 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $78,436 | $2,623 | $78,198 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 6 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 28 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $79.3K.
No endorsements page
Lost · 15,552 votes (32%) · 2 of 3 · Full results ↗
Advanced · 5,078 votes (60%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $93,531
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
100% of the money placed by state came from inside Texas: $79.3K of $79.3K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 28 contributions · 100% | $79,312 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 1 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 97% of ranked | $76,712 |
| Written instead of an employer · 3 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $1,100 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $1,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 22 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $300 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% of ranked | $200 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,041) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 97% of ranked | $76,712 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 3 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $1,100 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $1,000 |
| 22 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $300 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% of ranked | $200 |
Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,041) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Total itemized disbursements $7,435
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 34 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7 payments · 52% of all spending | $5,768 |
| 19 payments · 14% of all spending | $1,549 |
| 8 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $118 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.