Aurora Stuski (R) for Congress, Pennsylvania's 4th, 2026

American families deserve food that is safe, nutritious, honestly labeled, and produced here at home. Recent federal food-safety initiatives are working to remove harmful artificial dyes, strengthen inspections, improve infant-formula safety, promote healthier foods, and provide clearer “Product of the USA” labeling. At the same time, we must support American farmers, ranchers, and small food producers by eliminating unnecessary regulations that raise costs without improving safety. I believe we can protect our food supply, give consumers greater transparency, and strengthen American agriculture—without expanding needless government bureaucracy.
Making America's food supply safer: The Administration is taking a renewed approach to food safety by increasing scrutiny of food additives and contaminants, strengthening inspections, improving infant-formula safety, and working to reduce children's exposure to harmful substances in food.
Getting harmful artificial dyes out of our food: The FDA has taken action to remove outdated petroleum-based color additives and is working toward replacing unnecessary artificial dyes with safer alternatives.
Putting real food back on the table: New federal nutrition policies are emphasizing whole, nutrient-dense foods and giving families better information about what they are putting on their tables.
Supporting American farmers and ranchers: Recent actions are helping small farmers and meat processors compete, reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens, and expanding opportunities for producers to process and sell their own products across state lines—while maintaining strong food-safety standards.
Giving consumers more information: New "Product of the USA" labeling gives Americans greater confidence about where their meat, poultry, and eggs come from.
I believe we can have both strong food-safety standards and less unnecessary government bureaucracy. Farmers and small food producers should be able to compete, innovate, and sell directly to consumers without being buried in regulations that do nothing to make the food safer. At the same time, Americans deserve confidence that the food on their tables is safe, properly inspected, and honestly labeled.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aurora4pa.com/safer-food-stronger-farms-healthier-families

Heading as listed on aurora4pa.com ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com at this heading)

I grew up in Philadelphia, and both my uncle and my cousin served as Philadelphia police officers. I’m going to show my age a little here, but I grew up in a time when information wasn’t instantly available at our fingertips. If there was a report on the evening news about an officer being shot or an officer down, families would rush to the phone to make calls and make sure their loved ones were safe.
That’s what law enforcement is to me: family.
As a small business owner, I have worked directly with law enforcement officers in multiple jurisdictions whenever they reached out for assistance or expertise. As a jewelry appraiser, gemologist, and precious metals buyer, I occasionally encountered situations involving stolen property or suspected criminal activity. Whenever possible, I worked with victims and law enforcement to help recover property and support investigations—even when doing so created challenges or backlash for my business.
I have also spoken publicly in support of local law enforcement when they were being unfairly criticized for carrying out their duties or assisting federal agencies in executing lawful warrants.
My respect for law enforcement will never waver. I will continue to speak out in support of the men and women who put on the badge every day, especially when they are unable to speak for themselves.
I am a strong supporter of both law enforcement and the Second Amendment. I support both without reservation.
I believe police officers should be able to do their jobs without constantly worrying about becoming targets of anti-police rhetoric from politicians, activists, or media organizations. Every day, they put their lives on the line to protect our communities. That level of service and sacrifice deserves respect and gratitude—not demonization.
As your representative in Congress, I will support legislation that strengthens and protects law enforcement officers and first responders. They deserve leaders who will stand with them consistently, not only when it is politically convenient.
Congresswoman Madeleine Dean often highlights legislation she has supported that enjoyed broad bipartisan backing. However, I believe true support for law enforcement is demonstrated when difficult votes arise—not just when supporting legislation is politically safe.
For example, Congresswoman Dean has prominently promoted her support for the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act. Among other provisions, the legislation proposed changes to federal standards for prosecuting police misconduct, limitations on qualified immunity in certain civil actions, expanded Department of Justice investigatory authority, and restrictions on no-knock warrants. While supporters viewed these reforms as accountability measures, many law enforcement organizations expressed concerns about their impact on policing.
More recently, Congresswoman Dean voted against the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Reform Act (H.R. 354), legislation strongly supported by the Fraternal Order of Police. The bill would have expanded concealed-carry protections for qualified active and retired law enforcement officers under the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA).
She also voted against legislation that included additional funding for the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
These votes reflect a different approach to law enforcement than my own.
I believe our police officers, sheriff’s deputies, federal agents, corrections officers, and first responders deserve strong and consistent support. They should have access to every reasonable protection, resource, and tool necessary to keep themselves and our communities safe.
If elected to Congress, it would be my honor to serve those who have dedicated their lives to serving us.
God bless our law enforcement officers and first responders, and God bless America.
What Is LEOSA?
LEOSA, the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act, is a federal law enacted in 2004 that allows qualified active and retired law enforcement officers to carry concealed firearms across state lines, subject to certain limitations and exceptions.
The LEOSA Reform Act (H.R. 354) was proposed legislation designed to clarify and expand certain protections under LEOSA, addressing concerns raised by active and retired officers regarding where they may legally carry.
Congresswoman Madeleine Dean voted against H.R. 354. The bill passed the House and would have expanded concealed-carry protections for qualified active and retired law enforcement officers in certain locations, including additional public areas and facilities. Her vote was recorded as "No" on the House roll-call vote for the legislation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aurora4pa.com/supporting-those-who-serve-why-i-stand-with-law-enforcement

Heading as listed on aurora4pa.com/author/aurora/page/2 ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/author/aurora/page/2 at this heading)

I testified against the proposed PAWC–Essential Utilities water merger because Pennsylvanians deserve transparency, competition, and protection of our natural resources.
Tuesday evening, May 5th, I attended the public hearing on the proposed merger between Pennsylvania American Water (PAWC) and Essential Utilities. As a PAWC customer, I testified on the record against the merger.
One moment stood out to me in particular. The judge asked whether any elected officials were present to testify on behalf of the public.
None were there.
A HUGE failure on their part to stand up for us!
That was deeply disappointing.
For this merger to move forward, it must be proven to be both “necessary and beneficial” to the public. I do not believe it meets that standard.
This merger appears less about improving service for consumers and more about consolidating market power. When fewer companies control critical infrastructure, consumers lose leverage, competition weakens, and accountability suffers.
Supporters claim rates will not increase, yet PAWC already filed for a 15% rate increase in Pennsylvania in December 2025.
At the hearing, I asked whether these companies could independently meet projected future water demands without merging.
That question matters because the real driver behind this proposal appears tied to Pennsylvania’s rapidly expanding data center industry.
Pennsylvania is quickly becoming a major target for AI and cloud computing infrastructure because of our access to water and power resources. Governor Shapiro recently announced a $20 billion agreement with Amazon tied to data center development and AI innovation campuses across the Commonwealth.
As of early 2026, Pennsylvania has approximately 129 data centers, including both operational and planned facilities.
This rapid expansion raises serious concerns about:
water consumption
energy demand
environmental impact
and the long-term effect on local communities
Large data centers can consume enormous amounts of water for cooling—in some cases, millions of gallons per day. Communities also face concerns about noise, light pollution, strain on electrical infrastructure, and environmental emissions.
I support technological advancement and economic growth. But government has a responsibility to ensure communities, consumers, and natural resources are protected before massive infrastructure expansion takes place, not after.
Unfortunately, Pennsylvania’s leadership appears to be moving faster to incentivize development than to establish meaningful safeguards for residents and local municipalities.
Even more concerning are efforts to weaken local control by limiting counties' and municipalities' ability to regulate data center development within their own communities.
This should not be a partisan issue.
Protecting consumers, preserving competition, safeguarding our water resources, and ensuring local communities retain a voice in development decisions should matter to everyone, regardless of political party.
Pennsylvanians deserve transparency, accountability, and leadership willing to stand up for the public interest before irreversible decisions are made.
Who is protecting Pennsylvania’s water?
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aurora4pa.com/pennsylvania-pay-attention-to-water-merger

Heading as listed on aurora4pa.com/author/aurora/page/2 ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/author/aurora/page/2 at this heading)

My guiding principle: The U.S. government's first responsibility is to protect the American people. ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)
Our foreign policy should defend our national security, protect American service members, strengthen our economy, preserve our independence, and maintain relationships that genuinely serve U.S. interests.
America should be a strong and reliable ally. But being a reliable ally does not mean writing blank checks, accepting unlimited financial obligations, or sending our sons and daughters into foreign wars without a clear and compelling national defense purpose.
I believe in peace through strength, responsible international engagement, and a military capable of defending our country. I also believe our allies must accept their fair share of the financial and security burdens of protecting their own nations.
My priority as a member of Congress will be to put American families, workers, veterans, taxpayers, and communities first.
1. No open-ended foreign wars ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)
American military personnel should not be placed in harm's way without a clearly defined national security purpose.
Before supporting an expanded military operation, I will demand answers to five questions:
What direct threat to American national security are we addressing?
What specific objective are our military personnel expected to accomplish?
What legal authority and congressional oversight govern the operation?
What are the expected financial costs and risks to American service members?
What is the exit strategy, and what conditions will allow our troops to come home?
I support a strong military capable of deterring aggression and defending the United States. I do not support treating military intervention as the default response to every international crisis.
When military action is necessary to defend our country, protect American personnel, or address a genuine and compelling national security threat, the mission must be clearly defined, lawfully authorized, adequately supported, and subject to continuing oversight.
2. Responsible support for Israel and other allies ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)
Israel is an American ally, and I recognize the importance of maintaining relationships that advance American security and stability.
Israel has a legitimate right to protect its people from terrorism. The October 7, 2023, attacks demonstrated the devastating consequences of terrorism against civilians. Hamas and other terrorist organizations must not be permitted to threaten American interests, attack our citizens, or use regional instability to advance their objectives.
However, supporting Israel's security does not require endorsing every action taken by its government.
I do not condone much of what has happened in Gaza, and I believe the United States must carefully evaluate how its financial assistance, weapons transfers, and diplomatic support are being used.
My approach would be to:
Preserve security cooperation that demonstrably advances American national interests.
Distinguish defensive systems and intelligence cooperation from offensive weapons transfers.
Demand transparency and accountability for American military assistance.
Apply existing U.S. legal requirements consistently, including those governing arms transfers and human rights.
Oppose attacks on civilians, hostage-taking, terrorism, and the unlawful use of force, regardless of who commits them.
Support humanitarian assistance for innocent civilians and diplomatic efforts that reduce the likelihood of renewed war.
Reassess assistance when its purposes, conditions, or results cannot be adequately justified.
American support should be based on clearly defined objectives and mutual responsibility, not an assumption that any ally is entitled to unlimited assistance.
3. Allies must carry their fair share ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)
The United States cannot be expected to finance and enforce the security of the entire world indefinitely.
Our allies have their own governments, economies, armed forces, and responsibilities. They should make meaningful contributions to their own defense and to international security arrangements from which they benefit.
This principle applies to Israel, NATO members, and other security partners.
I will support stronger burden-sharing agreements, clearer commitments from our allies, and greater transparency about the costs and results of international security cooperation.
When an ally faces a legitimate threat, the United States should evaluate how best to help without automatically assuming the entire military or financial burden.
Partnership must mean shared responsibility.
4. Protect American service members and avoid unnecessary entanglement ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)
American troops are not a substitute for other countries' armed forces.
I oppose an open-ended American ground combat mission in Gaza or another foreign conflict when there is no compelling U.S. national defense justification.
Any proposed deployment should have a clear mission, a lawful basis, appropriate congressional authorization, defined limits, and a credible plan to transfer responsibilities or bring our personnel home.
I will also demand regular reporting on the number of American personnel involved in overseas missions, their responsibilities, the risks they face, and the costs to American taxpayers, consistent with legitimate operational security.
Our service members deserve more than expressions of gratitude. They deserve a government that takes their lives, their missions, and their return home seriously.
5. Foreign aid must be accountable to American taxpayers ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)
Every dollar of foreign assistance represents resources that American taxpayers worked to earn.
Foreign assistance should not be automatic, unlimited, or exempt from scrutiny simply because it benefits an ally.
I will support rigorous examination of foreign aid, including:
The direct benefit to American national security.
The recipient country's financial contribution.
The intended use of the funds or equipment.
Compliance with applicable American laws and conditions.
Evidence that the assistance is achieving its stated purpose.
Opportunities to reduce waste, improve oversight, or end programs that no longer serve their intended objectives.
I will also distinguish military assistance from humanitarian relief. Helping innocent people obtain food, medicine, clean water, and emergency shelter is a different policy decision from financing military operations, and each deserves its own evaluation.
6. Strong international relationships without sacrificing American interests ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)
Foreign policy affects American jobs, energy prices, trade, supply chains, technology, and national security.
I recognize that the United States cannot ignore the rest of the world. Maintaining constructive relationships with allies and trading partners is important to our prosperity and security.
But diplomacy should advance American interests, not create obligations without a clear purpose.
I support pursuing peaceful solutions where possible, protecting American workers in international trade, securing critical supply chains, strengthening cooperation against terrorism, and building partnerships that produce measurable benefits for the American people.
We should be strong enough to defend ourselves, responsible enough to avoid unnecessary wars, and practical enough to work with other nations when doing so benefits our country.
7. Bring the focus back home ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)
My highest priority is addressing the challenges American families face every day.
Families in Berks and Montgomery Counties are concerned about housing costs, taxes, energy expenses, healthcare, public safety, retirement security, and the opportunities available to their children.
Those concerns deserve the attention, resources, and serious policymaking of their elected representatives.
Every major foreign-policy commitment should be considered alongside our responsibilities at home. That does not mean abandoning the world. It means recognizing that America's strength ultimately depends on the prosperity, security, and confidence of its own people.
We should not neglect American communities while making international commitments that lack clear objectives, adequate accountability, or a credible end point.
My commitment
I believe America should be strong, respected, prepared to defend itself, and reliable in its international relationships.
I also believe our country should never confuse loyalty to an ally with an obligation to endorse every policy that ally pursues.
My standard will be consistent: protect American lives, defend our national interests, spend taxpayer money responsibly, hold our partners accountable, and pursue peace wherever it can be achieved without compromising our security.
America can stand with its allies without surrendering its judgment. We can defend ourselves without entering every war. And we can engage with the world while putting the American people first.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances

Heading as listed on aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)

Purpose ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)
Create a national framework ensuring that an adult with lifelong intellectual or developmental disabilities and significant mental-health or behavioral needs does not lose housing, care, benefits, or community placement simply because an aging parent can no longer provide care.
Families should not have to wait for a parent to become seriously ill or pass away before figuring out where their loved one will live, who will provide care, and how their needs will be met.
The goal is to replace crisis-driven decisions with lifelong planning, stable support, and real choices for individuals and their families.
Lifetime Support Plans ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)
Every eligible adult would have the right to develop a voluntary Lifetime Support Plan.
The plan would identify:
preferred living arrangement;
medical providers;
psychiatric and behavioral-health providers;
medications;
communication needs;
daily support needs;
transportation;
employment and day activities;
benefits;
financial arrangements;
decision-making arrangements;
emergency contacts;
backup caregivers;
housing preferences;
crisis procedures;
long-term arrangements if the primary caregiver dies or becomes unable to provide care.
The plan would belong to the individual, not to a particular agency or provider.
Planning for Aging Caregivers ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)
Federal funding would help states identify families in which an adult with significant intellectual or developmental disabilities lives with an aging caregiver who provides substantial daily assistance.
Families would receive transition planning before a crisis occurs.
The program would specifically address situations in which an elderly parent remains the primary caregiver for a middle-aged or older disabled adult.
Families should have time to plan, make choices, visit potential housing, establish support relationships, and prepare for a future transition.
Integrated Disability and Mental-Health Support ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)
States would establish specialized community teams for people with co-occurring intellectual or developmental disabilities and significant psychiatric or behavioral needs.
Teams could include:
developmental-disability specialists;
psychiatrists;
psychologists;
nurses;
behavioral specialists;
social workers;
housing specialists;
primary-care providers.
The goal would be to prevent people from being passed back and forth between the developmental-disability and mental-health systems.
Individuals with complex needs should receive coordinated care from a system that understands the whole person.
Community Crisis Stabilization ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)
States receiving federal funds would establish community crisis-response capacity specifically designed for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
When clinically appropriate, the first response to a behavioral crisis should be stabilization and treatment rather than automatic emergency-room use or institutional placement.
When hospitalization does occur, hospitals would receive support for specialized discharge planning to ensure that individuals return to an appropriate community setting whenever possible.
A Continuum of Housing Choices ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)
Federal housing and Medicaid programs would be coordinated to expand a range of community-based living options, including:
supported independent apartments;
small supported residences;
shared-living arrangements;
accessible apartments with visiting support;
support provided in the family home;
higher-support community residences.
No individual or family should have to choose between an aging parent continuing to provide unsustainable levels of care and institutional placement.
The objective would be to create meaningful choices that reflect each person's abilities, preferences, and support needs.
Strengthening the Direct-Support Workforce ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)
Medicaid home- and community-based services reimbursement would be strengthened to improve compensation, training, recruitment, and retention of direct-support professionals.
Federal funding would support:
higher reimbursement;
paid training;
career advancement opportunities;
certification;
respite coverage;
additional staffing capacity;
incentives for underserved and rural communities.
States would be required to demonstrate that increased federal funding is translating into improved workforce capacity and more reliable access to services.
A community-based system cannot function without the people who provide daily support.
Respite for Family Caregivers ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)
Eligible family caregivers would receive a defined annual respite benefit.
Respite could include:
in-home support;
short-term residential care;
weekend programs;
emergency backup care.
The purpose would be to give caregivers time to rest, address their own health and responsibilities, and continue providing care without reaching the point of exhaustion or crisis.
Respite should be viewed as prevention, not simply as an additional benefit.
Emergency Backup Care ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)
Every participant in a Lifetime Support Plan would have an identified emergency arrangement.
If the primary caregiver:
becomes hospitalized;
dies;
experiences an incapacitating event; or
otherwise becomes unable to provide care,
the individual would have a predetermined emergency pathway.
Families should never have to discover the available options for the first time in the middle of a medical emergency or after the death of a parent.
Benefits and Financial Protection ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)
Federal agencies would establish coordinated assistance for:
SSI and SSDI;
Medicaid;
Medicare, where applicable;
housing assistance;
special-needs trusts;
ABLE accounts;
guardianship and supported-decision-making arrangements.
Families would receive a coordinated benefits review rather than having to independently navigate multiple agencies and programs.
The objective would be to help families understand the resources available to them and protect the individual's eligibility for essential benefits.
National Accountability and Data ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)
States would report standardized information concerning:
waiting lists;
caregiver age;
residential placements;
emergency placements;
psychiatric hospitalization;
institutionalization;
workforce vacancies;
workforce turnover;
service denials;
unmet housing needs.
The federal government would publish an annual report identifying where the largest service gaps exist.
What gets measured should help determine where resources and reforms are needed most.
A Predictable Transition for Families ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)
The central principle of this plan is simple:
A person's lifetime disability support should not collapse because the person who has been holding the system together—the parent—gets old.
Parents should not have to spend their later years wondering what will happen to their son or daughter when they can no longer provide care.
Adults with lifelong disabilities should have a plan that follows them throughout their lives, regardless of which caregiver, agency, or provider is involved.
Building a System Before the Crisis ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)
This plan would shift the focus from emergency intervention to advance planning.
Instead of waiting for:
a caregiver's hospitalization;
a parent's death;
a behavioral-health crisis;
an emergency-room visit;
a housing loss; or
an institutional placement,
families and states would have a system for planning ahead.
The goal is straightforward:
Replace predictable crises with predictable systems of support.
Every adult with significant lifelong disabilities deserves stability, dignity, community, and a future that does not depend entirely on how long an aging parent is able to keep going.
Aurora Stuski for Congress
Fighting for Berks and Montgomery Counties
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families

Heading as listed on aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)

Report	Raised in the period	Spent in the period	Cash on hand at its close
OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026	$8,800	$7,312	$4,195
PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026	$950	$2,791	$2,354

Employer as filed		Amount
Conicelli Autoplex1 contribution · 32% of ranked		$500
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 1 contribution · 32% of ranked		$500
Smdi3 contributions · 19% of ranked		$300
Northstar1 contribution · 16% of ranked		$250

Occupation as filed		Amount
Automotive Dealer1 contribution · 32% of ranked		$500
Accountant3 contributions · 19% of ranked		$300
Electrician1 contribution · 16% of ranked		$250
HomemakerWritten instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 16% of ranked		$250
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 1 contribution · 16% of ranked		$250

Name		Amount
Signrocket4 payments · 33% of all spending		$3,380
BCRC3 payments · 26% of all spending		$2,630
Vistaprint4 payments · 18% of all spending		$1,840
North Penn VFW1 payment · 9.4% of all spending		$950
MCRC1 payment · 8.5% of all spending		$855
Anedot1 payment · <0.1% of all spending		$8

Aurora Stuski

SummaryAt a glance

Their wordsWhat does Stuski say they will do?

1Priority 1: Safer Food, Stronger Farms, Healthier Families 3 statements

2Priority 2: A Platform for Strong Families, Safe Communities, and Responsible Growth 1 statement

3Priority 3: Lower Costs, Stronger Economy 1 statement

4Priority 4: Safe Communities 2 statements

5Priority 5: Secure Border, Secure Pennsylvania 1 statement

6Priority 6: Transparent Government 1 statement

7Priority 7: A Platform for Strong Families, Safe Communities, and Responsible Growth 10 parts

7.1Priority 7.1: Strong Families 3 statements

7.2Priority 7.2: Responsible Growth 5 statements

Guiding Principle ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/a-platform-for-strong-families-safe-communities-and-responsible-growth at this heading)

7.3Priority 7.3: 1. Protect Seniors and Veterans 2 statements

7.4Priority 7.4: 2. Preserve Affordable Manufactured Housing 2 statements

7.5Priority 7.5: 3. Increase Housing Supply Responsibly 2 statements

7.6Priority 7.6: 4. Youth Support and Opportunity Network (YSON) 3 statements

7.7Priority 7.7: 5. Fiscal Responsibility Through Prevention 3 statements

7.8Priority 7.8: 6. Public Safety Through Prevention and Partnership 3 statements

7.9Priority 7.9: 7. Accountable Government 2 statements

7.10Priority 7.10: 8. Responsible Technology and Community Protection 6 statements

The Common Thread ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/a-platform-for-strong-families-safe-communities-and-responsible-growth at this heading)

Core Philosophy ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/a-platform-for-strong-families-safe-communities-and-responsible-growth at this heading)

8Priority 8: Shapiro Lies and Scare Tactics to Take Away Our Freedom 10 parts

8.1Priority 8.1: We Must Protect PA from Government Overreach in Proposed Health Regulation 10-242 8 statements

8.2Priority 8.2: #1: Entering buildings without warrants? It broadens executive power without adequate legislative accountability. 3 statements

8.3Priority 8.3: #2: It fails to provide sufficiently clear due-process protections over forced isolation and treatment. 2 statements

8.4Priority 8.4: #3: It threatens parental rights in schools. 4 statements

8.5Priority 8.5: #4: It violates your medical privacy, expanding access to private medical information. 4 statements

8.6Priority 8.6: #5: It creates expansive new government health databases without sufficient guardrails. 2 statements

8.7Priority 8.7: #6: It imposes new recordkeeping and compliance burdens on small businesses, schools, providers, and families. 2 statements

8.8Priority 8.8: #7: It gives new authority to restrict the movement of animals and animal-derived products. 1 statement

8.9Priority 8.9: #8: It deletes the religious-treatment accommodation that currently exists. 2 statements

8.10Priority 8.10: My Standard for Responsible Public Health Policy 1 statement

9Priority 9: Supporting Those Who Serve: Why I Stand With Law Enforcement 20 statements

10Priority 10: Pennsylvania Families Should Be Paying Attention to This Water Merger 22 statements

11Priority 11: America First: Peace Through Strength, Accountability, and Responsible Alliances 62 statements

My guiding principle: The U.S. government's first responsibility is to protect the American people. ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)

1. No open-ended foreign wars ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)

2. Responsible support for Israel and other allies ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)

3. Allies must carry their fair share ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)

4. Protect American service members and avoid unnecessary entanglement ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)

5. Foreign aid must be accountable to American taxpayers ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)

6. Strong international relationships without sacrificing American interests ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)

7. Bring the focus back home ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/peace-through-strength-accountability-and-responsible-alliances at this heading)

12Priority 12: My Plan to Support Aging Adults With Disabilities and Their Families 50 statements

Purpose ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)

Lifetime Support Plans ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)

Planning for Aging Caregivers ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)

Integrated Disability and Mental-Health Support ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)

Community Crisis Stabilization ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)

A Continuum of Housing Choices ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)

Strengthening the Direct-Support Workforce ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)

Respite for Family Caregivers ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)

Emergency Backup Care ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)

Benefits and Financial Protection ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)

National Accountability and Data ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)

A Predictable Transition for Families ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)

Building a System Before the Crisis ↗ (opens aurora4pa.com/support-aging-adults-with-disabilities-and-their-families at this heading)

MoneyWho pays for the campaign, and where does it go?

Raised, spent and cash over time by FEC report

Where the money came from $9,750 reported receipts

Largest donors

EndorsementsWho does Stuski’s campaign say backs them?

BallotWhen is Stuski on the ballot?

AboutWhere does this page come from?

Earlier cycles

Federal records

Campaign pages read 10 pages

Where the donors live $6,310 placed by state

Home state and away

Top states

Donors’ employers as filed

Donors’ occupations as filed

Outside spending $299 across this race

What the payments were for $9,663 itemized

Filed as

Paid to

Filed as

Paid to