Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › MS-04 race › 2025–2026
I Independent nominee for U.S. House, MS-04
Has not served in Congress
2 priorities from carl4congress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
I will never be a "useful idiot" for leadership. My vote is governed by the Constitution and the needs of my constituents, period.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · carl4congress.com/two-party-corruption
The only way to break the "incumbency racket" is to ensure that public service is a temporary duty, not a permanent career.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · carl4congress.com/two-party-corruption
We need a system that stops backroom meddling and returns the power of choice to voters, not party elites.
The two-party system is two sides of the same corrupt coin. It's time we stopped flipping the coin and started changing the currency.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · carl4congress.com/two-party-corruption
The US debt is skyrocketing, and both parties are doing nothing to rein it in. As of today, we have brought in 4.4 trillion dollars in tax revenue. As of today, the government has spent 6.1 trillion dollars. That means, so far this year, we have spent 1.7 trillion dollars more than we brought in tax revenue. This has a direct bearing on inflation and on the dollar's devaluation.
This doesn't account for the fact that we have almost 200 trillion dollars in unfunded liabilities. We had an opportunity to draw down some of our debt in the vote to increase the debt ceiling. Unfortunately, our Congressman Mike Ezell voted with the Democrats to increase the debt ceiling. We were at 32.4 trillion dollars, and within a couple of weeks, we went to 33 trillion dollars. Now, just a few months later, we are at 33.65 trillion dollars in debt and hurtling towards 34 trillion dollars. And with this debt ceiling increase, they have decided not to hold another vote on an increase until January 2025. After the 2024 election, they don't have to fight during the election. Which, of course, means that our deficit could hit 36/38 trillion dollars by then.
The more money the government prints, the less value our dollar has, which increases inflation. We have already seen our dollar devalue against the peso and many other currencies worldwide. Countries like China and India are trying to replace the dollar with other currencies. We can make the dollar the go-to currency again if we just enact sane fiscal policies. I will fight every day to put our fiscal house in order. We can't let the swamp win. We can balance our budget and get out of this fiscal train wreck of spending more than we bring in with common-sense solutions.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · carl4congress.com/the-us-is-rocketing-to-bankruptcy
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00937136
83¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 4 reports ($100.8K of $120.8K). Cash on hand went from $4.7K on Mar 31, 2026 to $20.1K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $5,076 | $422 | $4,654 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $38,450 | $1,260 | $41,845 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $52,300 | $69,023 | $25,121 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $25,000 | $30,051 | $20,070 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
1 endorser listed on Boyanton Lester Carl’s own campaign site.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Lost · 9,280 votes (4.3%) · 3 of 3 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 9 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 16 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $19.8K.
Total reported receipts $120,826
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
55% of the money placed by state came from inside Mississippi: $11K of $19.8K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 11 contributions · 55% | $10,984 |
| 2 contributions · 18% | $3,583 |
| 1 contribution · 18% | $3,500 |
| 1 contribution · 7.9% | $1,562 |
| 1 contribution · 1% | $208 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 5 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 4 contributions · 55% of ranked | $8,083 |
| 1 contribution · 20% of ranked | $3,000 |
| 1 contribution · 11% of ranked | $1,562 |
| 1 contribution · 6.8% of ranked | $1,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 5 contributions · 6.2% of ranked | $908 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $208 |
A further $5,076 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($986) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Total itemized disbursements $98,668
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 27 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 72% of all spending | $72,500 |
| 3 payments · 16% of all spending | $16,500 |
| 3 payments · 5.8% of all spending | $5,874 |
| 1 payment · 1.3% of all spending | $1,305 |
| 1 payment · 0.9% of all spending | $940 |
| 2 payments · 0.6% of all spending | $644 |
| 1 payment · 0.3% of all spending | $300 |
| 3 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $174 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| 2 contributions · 30% of ranked | $4,500 |
| 2 contributions · 24% of ranked | $3,583 |
| 1 contribution · 20% of ranked | $3,000 |
| 1 contribution · 11% of ranked | $1,562 |
| 1 contribution · 6.8% of ranked | $1,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 5 contributions · 6.2% of ranked | $908 |
| 1 contribution · 1.4% of ranked | $208 |
A further $5,076 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($986) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.